Standards Comparison

    HITRUST CSF

    Voluntary
    2022

    Certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ security standards

    VS

    ISO 14064

    Voluntary
    2018

    International standard for GHG quantification, reporting, verification.

    Quick Verdict

    HITRUST CSF delivers certifiable cybersecurity assurance for healthcare and regulated industries, while ISO 14064 provides GHG emissions accounting standards for all sectors. Companies adopt HITRUST for compliance efficiency and trust; ISO 14064 for credible climate reporting and decarbonization.

    Information Security

    HITRUST CSF

    HITRUST Common Security Framework

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Harmonizes 60+ frameworks into certifiable control library
    • Risk-based tailoring via structured scoping factors
    • Five-level maturity model scoring policy to managed
    • Centralized QA with authorized assessor ecosystem
    • MyCSF platform enables assess once report many
    Greenhouse Gas Accounting

    ISO 14064

    ISO 14064 Greenhouse Gases Standards

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Three-part framework for inventories, projects, verification
    • Five principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
    • Defines Scope 1-3 emission boundaries and baselines
    • Risk-based validation and verification processes
    • Aligns with GHG Protocol for global compatibility

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    HITRUST CSF Details

    What It Is

    HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF) is a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework harmonizing over 60 authoritative sources like ISO 27001, NIST 800-53, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and GDPR. It provides risk-based, prescriptive requirements for security and privacy in regulated sectors, using a hierarchical structure of categories, objectives, specifications, and maturity-scored statements.

    Key Components

    • 19 assessment domains covering governance, technical controls, and resilience (e.g., Access Control, Incident Management, Risk Management).
    • 14 categories, 49 objectives, ~156 specifications with tiered implementation levels.
    • Five-level maturity model (Policy, Procedure, Implemented, Measured, Managed).
    • e1/i1/r2 certification paths via MyCSF platform and authorized assessors.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Adopted for unified compliance, third-party assurance, and market differentiation in healthcare/finance. Reduces audit fatigue via "assess once, report many"; builds stakeholder trust with 99.4% breach-free certified environments; lowers insurance premiums and sales friction.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: scoping via MyCSF/inheritance, readiness/gap analysis, remediation (policies, evidence), validated assessment, continuous monitoring. Suited for mid-to-large regulated organizations; requires 12-18 months, assessor fees, MyCSF tooling.

    ISO 14064 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 14064 is an international standard family (ISO 14064-1:2018, -2:2019, -3:2019) providing specifications with guidance for GHG quantification, reporting, and assurance. It covers organizational inventories, project-level reductions/removals, and validation/verification, using a principle-based approach emphasizing relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, and accuracy.

    Key Components

    • **Three partsPart 1 (organizational inventories), Part 2 (projects), Part 3 (assurance).
    • Five core principles mirroring GHG Protocol.
    • Scopes 1-3 for emissions classification.
    • Voluntary verification model under Part 3, often paired with ISO 14065.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Meets regulatory demands (e.g., CSRD, SB-253) and investor needs.
    • Enhances credibility, reduces greenwashing risk.
    • Drives operational efficiencies and decarbonization strategies.
    • Builds stakeholder trust via assured reporting.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: governance, boundary-setting, data collection, verification.
    • Applies to all sizes/industries; mid-large firms typical.
    • Involves training, software, cross-functional teams; external verification recommended. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    HITRUST CSF
    Information security and privacy controls
    ISO 14064
    GHG emissions quantification and reporting

    Industry

    HITRUST CSF
    Healthcare, regulated sectors, global
    ISO 14064
    All sectors with GHG footprints, global

    Nature

    HITRUST CSF
    Voluntary certifiable framework
    ISO 14064
    Voluntary quantification standard

    Testing

    HITRUST CSF
    Maturity-based validated assessments
    ISO 14064
    Independent verification/validation

    Penalties

    HITRUST CSF
    Loss of certification, market access
    ISO 14064
    No penalties, loss of credibility

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about HITRUST CSF and ISO 14064

    HITRUST CSF FAQ

    ISO 14064 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages