Standards Comparison

    SOC 2

    Voluntary
    2010

    AICPA framework for Trust Services Criteria compliance

    VS

    BREEAM

    Voluntary
    1990

    Global certification framework for sustainable built environment

    Quick Verdict

    SOC 2 provides data security assurance for tech service organizations via CPA audits, while BREEAM certifies sustainable building performance through assessor evaluations. Companies adopt SOC 2 to win enterprise deals and BREEAM to boost asset value and ESG credentials.

    Cybersecurity / Trust

    SOC 2

    System and Organization Controls 2

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Trust Services Criteria with mandatory Security controls
    • Type 2 audits operating effectiveness over 3-12 months
    • Tailored scoping for service organizations handling data
    • Independent CPA firm attestation reports
    • Overlaps 80% with ISO 27001 and HIPAA controls
    Building Sustainability

    BREEAM

    Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Credit-based weighted scoring across 10 categories
    • Third-party certification by licensed assessors
    • Multiple schemes for lifecycle and asset types
    • Evidence-driven compliance with KBCNs
    • Alignment to net-zero, biodiversity, resilience

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    SOC 2 Details

    What It Is

    SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary attestation framework developed by the AICPA to evaluate service organizations' controls over customer data. It focuses on Trust Services Criteria (TSC)—principles-based assessment of systems handling sensitive information via risk-based controls.

    Key Components

    • Five TSCSecurity** (mandatory, CC1-CC9), Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, Privacy (optional).
    • 50-100 controls mapped to Common Criteria (CC series), built on COSO principles.
    • Type 1 (design at point-in-time); Type 2 (design + operating effectiveness over 3-12 months).
    • Independent CPA audit model with unqualified opinions ideal.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives enterprise sales by streamlining due diligence, reducing CAC 20-50%. Mitigates breach risks ($1M+ liabilities), builds trust moats for SaaS/cloud providers. Voluntary but market-mandated for VRM; overlaps frameworks like ISO 27001 (80%), HIPAA.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis (2-4 weeks), control deployment (4-8 weeks), monitoring (3-6 months), audit (1-2 months). Targets SaaS/fintech (10-500+ employees); automation (Vanta) cuts effort 70%. Annual recertification with bridge letters.

    BREEAM Details

    What It Is

    BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) is a science-led sustainability certification framework for the built environment. It assesses performance across buildings, infrastructure, and communities throughout their lifecycle, using a credit-based, weighted scoring methodology to deliver comparable ratings.

    Key Components

    • **Ten core categoriesManagement, Health & Wellbeing, Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Waste, Land Use & Ecology, Pollution, Innovation.
    • Hundreds of credits across issues, with scheme-specific manuals and Knowledge Base Compliance Notes (KBCNs).
    • **Rating levelsPass (≥30%), Good (≥45%), Very Good (≥55%), Excellent (≥70%), Outstanding (≥85%).
    • Third-party certification via licensed assessors and BRE audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Drives ESG compliance, net-zero alignment, and operational savings (e.g., 22-33% energy reduction).
    • Enhances asset value (up to 30% premiums), tenant appeal, and regulatory readiness (e.g., EU Taxonomy).
    • Mitigates risks in climate resilience, biodiversity, and greenwashing via auditable evidence.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased approach: pre-assessment, design integration, construction evidence, certification, In-Use monitoring.
    • Applies globally to all sizes/types; requires early assessor/AP involvement, evidence management, BRE training.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    SOC 2
    Data security, availability, confidentiality, privacy
    BREEAM
    Building sustainability, energy, health, ecology

    Industry

    SOC 2
    SaaS, cloud, tech service organizations globally
    BREEAM
    Construction, real estate, infrastructure worldwide

    Nature

    SOC 2
    Voluntary AICPA audit framework
    BREEAM
    Voluntary BRE certification standard

    Testing

    SOC 2
    Type 2 audits over 3-12 months by CPAs
    BREEAM
    Assessor-led credit assessments with BRE QA

    Penalties

    SOC 2
    Lost business, no legal fines
    BREEAM
    No penalties, market/reputational risks

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about SOC 2 and BREEAM

    SOC 2 FAQ

    BREEAM FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages