SOC 2
AICPA framework for Trust Services Criteria compliance
BREEAM
Global certification framework for sustainable built environment
Quick Verdict
SOC 2 provides data security assurance for tech service organizations via CPA audits, while BREEAM certifies sustainable building performance through assessor evaluations. Companies adopt SOC 2 to win enterprise deals and BREEAM to boost asset value and ESG credentials.
SOC 2
System and Organization Controls 2
Key Features
- Trust Services Criteria with mandatory Security controls
- Type 2 audits operating effectiveness over 3-12 months
- Tailored scoping for service organizations handling data
- Independent CPA firm attestation reports
- Overlaps 80% with ISO 27001 and HIPAA controls
BREEAM
Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method
Key Features
- Credit-based weighted scoring across 10 categories
- Third-party certification by licensed assessors
- Multiple schemes for lifecycle and asset types
- Evidence-driven compliance with KBCNs
- Alignment to net-zero, biodiversity, resilience
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
SOC 2 Details
What It Is
SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary attestation framework developed by the AICPA to evaluate service organizations' controls over customer data. It focuses on Trust Services Criteria (TSC)—principles-based assessment of systems handling sensitive information via risk-based controls.
Key Components
- Five TSCSecurity** (mandatory, CC1-CC9), Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, Privacy (optional).
- 50-100 controls mapped to Common Criteria (CC series), built on COSO principles.
- Type 1 (design at point-in-time); Type 2 (design + operating effectiveness over 3-12 months).
- Independent CPA audit model with unqualified opinions ideal.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives enterprise sales by streamlining due diligence, reducing CAC 20-50%. Mitigates breach risks ($1M+ liabilities), builds trust moats for SaaS/cloud providers. Voluntary but market-mandated for VRM; overlaps frameworks like ISO 27001 (80%), HIPAA.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis (2-4 weeks), control deployment (4-8 weeks), monitoring (3-6 months), audit (1-2 months). Targets SaaS/fintech (10-500+ employees); automation (Vanta) cuts effort 70%. Annual recertification with bridge letters.
BREEAM Details
What It Is
BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) is a science-led sustainability certification framework for the built environment. It assesses performance across buildings, infrastructure, and communities throughout their lifecycle, using a credit-based, weighted scoring methodology to deliver comparable ratings.
Key Components
- **Ten core categoriesManagement, Health & Wellbeing, Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Waste, Land Use & Ecology, Pollution, Innovation.
- Hundreds of credits across issues, with scheme-specific manuals and Knowledge Base Compliance Notes (KBCNs).
- **Rating levelsPass (≥30%), Good (≥45%), Very Good (≥55%), Excellent (≥70%), Outstanding (≥85%).
- Third-party certification via licensed assessors and BRE audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Drives ESG compliance, net-zero alignment, and operational savings (e.g., 22-33% energy reduction).
- Enhances asset value (up to 30% premiums), tenant appeal, and regulatory readiness (e.g., EU Taxonomy).
- Mitigates risks in climate resilience, biodiversity, and greenwashing via auditable evidence.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: pre-assessment, design integration, construction evidence, certification, In-Use monitoring.
- Applies globally to all sizes/types; requires early assessor/AP involvement, evidence management, BRE training.
Key Differences
| Aspect | SOC 2 | BREEAM |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Data security, availability, confidentiality, privacy | Building sustainability, energy, health, ecology |
| Industry | SaaS, cloud, tech service organizations globally | Construction, real estate, infrastructure worldwide |
| Nature | Voluntary AICPA audit framework | Voluntary BRE certification standard |
| Testing | Type 2 audits over 3-12 months by CPAs | Assessor-led credit assessments with BRE QA |
| Penalties | Lost business, no legal fines | No penalties, market/reputational risks |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about SOC 2 and BREEAM
SOC 2 FAQ
BREEAM FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIST CSF in Your Organization
Master NIST CSF implementation in your organization with this detailed guide. Learn core functions, key steps, best practices, and tips for cybersecurity succes

Real-World ISO 27701 Success: Synthesized Case Studies, Metrics, and Lessons for Privacy Resilience
Real-world ISO 27701 success from Tribeca, Kocho: DSAR efficiency gains, risk score reductions, certification ROI. Synthesized metrics prove privacy resilience

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PDPA vs SQF
Discover PDPA vs SQF: Compare Asia's data privacy laws (Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan) with SQF food safety certification. Key differences, compliance strategies & tips for global business. Dive in!
ISO 31000 vs J-SOX
Compare ISO 31000 vs J-SOX: Broad risk guidelines meet Japan's strict ICFR rules. Discover key differences in scope, principles, governance, and implementation for resilient compliance. Optimize now!
WEEE vs AS9120B
Discover WEEE vs AS9120B: Compare EU e-waste rules with aerospace distributor quality standards. Master compliance risks, targets & strategies for electronics chains. Unlock insights now!