Standards Comparison

    HITRUST CSF

    Voluntary
    2022

    Certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ security standards

    VS

    ISO 22000

    Voluntary
    2018

    International standard for food safety management systems

    Quick Verdict

    HITRUST CSF delivers certifiable cybersecurity assurance for healthcare and regulated industries, while ISO 22000 ensures food safety management across the global food chain. Companies adopt HITRUST for third-party trust and compliance mapping; ISO 22000 for hazard control and market access.

    Information Security

    HITRUST CSF

    HITRUST Common Security Framework

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Harmonizes 60+ standards for assess once, report many
    • Risk-based tailoring via organizational/system/regulatory factors
    • Five-level maturity model from policy to managed
    • MyCSF platform orchestrates scoping, evidence, certification
    • Centralized validated certification by authorized assessors
    Food Safety

    ISO 22000

    ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • High-Level Structure (HLS) for integrated management systems
    • Dual PDCA cycles for organizational and operational control
    • Hazard analysis with CCPs and OPRPs categorization
    • Prerequisite programs (PRPs) for hygienic baseline
    • Interactive communication across food chain

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    HITRUST CSF Details

    What It Is

    HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF) is a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework harmonizing requirements from 60+ standards like ISO 27001, NIST 800-53, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and GDPR. It employs a risk-based approach with structured tailoring via organizational, system, and regulatory factors, organized across 19 assessment domains and a hierarchical control taxonomy (14 categories, ~49 objectives, ~156 specifications).

    Key Components

    • 19 domains covering governance, technical controls, and resilience (e.g., Access Control, Risk Management, Incident Management).
    • **Five-level maturity modelPolicy (15%), Procedure (20%), Implemented (40%), Measured (10%), Managed (15%).
    • Tiered assessments: e1 (44 controls), i1 (182 requirements), r2 (tailored, highest level).
    • MyCSF platform for scoping, evidence management; centralized certification via authorized assessors.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Provides unified compliance, reliable third-party assurance, and operational maturity for healthcare/finance. Reduces audit fatigue, enables "assess once, report many," boosts market trust (99.4% breach-free claim), lowers insurance costs.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: scoping/gap analysis (MyCSF), remediation (policies, controls, evidence), validated assessment. Suits regulated industries; 6-18 months typical; requires assessor for certification, ongoing monitoring for recertification.

    ISO 22000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 22000:2018 is the international standard for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). It provides a certifiable framework for organizations in the food chain to ensure safe products through systematic hazard control. Its risk-based approach integrates HACCP principles with management system discipline using the High-Level Structure (HLS) and dual PDCA cycles.

    Key Components

    • **Clauses 4-10Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
    • Core elements: PRPs, hazard analysis, CCPs/OPRPs, traceability, communication, verification.
    • Built on Codex HACCP and HLS for integration.
    • Voluntary certification via accredited bodies.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Meets regulatory/customer requirements; reduces recalls/risks.
    • Enhances supply chain trust, market access (e.g., GFSI).
    • Drives efficiency, continual improvement, stakeholder confidence.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, PRPs, hazard control plan, training, audits.
    • Applicable to all food chain organizations; scalable by size.
    • Requires internal audits, management reviews; certification every 3 years.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    HITRUST CSF
    Information security and privacy controls
    ISO 22000
    Food safety management and hazard controls

    Industry

    HITRUST CSF
    Healthcare, finance, regulated sectors globally
    ISO 22000
    Food chain organizations worldwide, any size

    Nature

    HITRUST CSF
    Certifiable security framework, voluntary
    ISO 22000
    Certifiable FSMS standard, voluntary

    Testing

    HITRUST CSF
    Maturity-scored validated assessments by assessors
    ISO 22000
    Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits

    Penalties

    HITRUST CSF
    Loss of certification, market access issues
    ISO 22000
    Loss of certification, regulatory non-compliance risks

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about HITRUST CSF and ISO 22000

    HITRUST CSF FAQ

    ISO 22000 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages