What is the primary objective of **HITRUST CSF**?

**The primary objective of HITRUST CSF is to provide a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework that harmonizes requirements from over 60 authoritative sources into a single assurance program enabling "assess once, report many."** It consolidates controls across 19 assessment domains and a hierarchical taxonomy of 14 categories, 49 objectives, and approximately 156 specifications, using risk-based tailoring via organizational, system, and regulatory factors. The maturity model (Policy, Procedure, Implemented, Measured, Managed) ensures operational effectiveness, supported by MyCSF for scoping, evidence management, and validated certification.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **HITRUST CSF**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with HITRUST CSF, as it is a voluntary, industry-agnostic framework, though it is often contractually mandated by healthcare payers, providers, and business associates handling PHI/ePHI.** Primary users include covered entities, business associates, health IT vendors, payers, and life sciences firms, with expanding adoption in financial services and cloud providers facing third-party risk demands. Certification demonstrates assurance to regulators, customers, and insurers without statutory mandates.

Does **HITRUST CSF** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**HITRUST CSF requires external audits by Authorized External Assessors for validated assessments leading to certification, distinguishing it from self-assessments.** Validated pathways (e1: 44 controls, i1: 182 requirements, r2: risk-tailored) involve evidence-based testing (documentation, interviews, technical scans), MyCSF workflows, and HITRUST centralized QA review. Certification issuance follows assessor submission, with e1/i1 valid for 1 year and r2 for 2 years with interim review.

How often should an assessment for **HITRUST CSF** be performed?

**HITRUST CSF validated assessments must be performed based on certification validity: e1 and i1 annually, r2 every 2 years with a required interim assessment at the 1-year mark.** Readiness self-assessments can occur anytime via MyCSF for gap analysis. Ongoing maintenance includes continuous monitoring, CAP tracking, and CSF version updates to sustain maturity scores above thresholds like legacy "3+" (72-79 range).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **HITRUST CSF**?

**Non-compliance with HITRUST CSF results in no direct legal penalties, as it is voluntary, but leads to failed certification, loss of customer contracts, exclusion from procurement, higher cyber insurance premiums, and increased third-party risk exposure.** In healthcare ecosystems, payers often mandate it; failure denies market access, escalates vendor audits, and undermines reliance on standardized reports via RDS.

Can **HITRUST CSF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, HITRUST CSF includes built-in mappings to over 60 frameworks including HIPAA, NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001/27002, PCI DSS, GDPR, SOC 2, and FedRAMP, enabling requirement-level rollups via MyCSF Insights Reports.** Cross-references allow a single assessment to generate scorecards for multiple standards, supporting "assess once, report many" without separate audits.

What is the first step to begin implementing **HITRUST CSF**?

**The first step to implement HITRUST CSF is to access MyCSF, complete the scoping questionnaire defining organizational, system, and regulatory risk factors to generate a tailored control set.** This identifies applicable requirements (e.g., e1/i1/r2 baselines), enables inheritance from cloud providers, and produces a readiness gap analysis for remediation planning.

What is the primary objective of **SAMA CSF**?

**The primary objective of SAMA CSF is to create a common approach for addressing cybersecurity across SAMA-regulated financial institutions, achieve appropriate maturity levels of cybersecurity controls, and ensure cybersecurity risks are properly managed.** Version 1.0 (May 2017) establishes a principle-based framework with four domains—Cyber Security Leadership and Governance, Risk Management and Compliance, Operations and Technology, and Third Party Cyber Security—targeting at least Maturity Level 3 (Structured and Formalized) via a six-level model.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SAMA CSF**?

**SAMA CSF is mandatory for all SAMA-regulated entities in Saudi Arabia, including banks, insurance and reinsurance companies, financing companies, credit bureaus, and financial market infrastructure providers.** All domains apply fully to banks; non-banks have tailored exceptions (e.g., excluding payment systems unless handling cardholder data or SWIFT). Boards, senior management, CISOs, and compliance officers bear accountability, with third-party providers strongly recommended to align for ecosystem compliance.

Does **SAMA CSF** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**SAMA CSF does not require external third-party certification but mandates periodic self-assessments using SAMA-provided questionnaires and independent internal audits.** SAMA conducts supervisory reviews and audits of self-assessments to verify Maturity Level 3+ compliance. Internal audit performs cyber security audits per accepted standards; external auditors may assist, but compliance is demonstrated through evidence portfolios like policies, KRIs, and control artifacts.

How often should an assessment for **SAMA CSF** be performed?

**SAMA CSF requires periodic self-assessments using SAMA questionnaires, with annual reviews of critical information assets and more frequent assessments triggered by projects, changes, outsourcing, or new products.** Maturity levels are evaluated ongoing via KPIs (Level 3) and KRIs (Level 4+), supporting SAMA's supervisory benchmarking. Penetration testing is mandated annually for customer-facing services.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SAMA CSF**?

**Non-compliance with SAMA CSF triggers regulatory enforcement including supervisory actions, remediation demands, elevated scrutiny, audit findings, and potential operational restrictions.** As a mandated framework, violations fall under SAMA's broader banking powers, risking fines, mandated audits, business interruptions, reputational damage, and systemic interventions for critical infrastructure failures.

Can **SAMA CSF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SAMA CSF conceptually aligns with international frameworks like NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, and BASEL, enabling control mappings for integrated compliance.** Its domains mirror NIST functions (Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover) and ISO 27001's ISMS, with explicit references to PCI-DSS and SWIFT CSCF for sector-specific controls, though official SAMA mappings are absent.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SAMA CSF**?

**The first step to implement SAMA CSF is to secure Board and senior management sponsorship, establish governance (e.g., Cyber Security Committee and CISO), and conduct a control-level gap analysis against the framework's maturity model.** Phase 1 (Initiation & Gap Analysis) inventories assets, baselines maturity (targeting Level 3+), and produces a gap register using SAMA control considerations.

HITRUST CSF vs SAMA CSF

Standards Comparison

HITRUST CSF

Voluntary

2022

Certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ security standards

SAMA CSF

Mandatory

2017

Saudi regulatory framework for financial cybersecurity compliance

Quick Verdict

HITRUST CSF offers voluntary, certifiable assurance harmonizing 60+ standards for global healthcare and beyond, while SAMA CSF mandates maturity-based controls for Saudi financial institutions. Organizations adopt HITRUST for market trust and efficiency; SAMA for regulatory compliance.

Information Security

HITRUST CSF

HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Harmonizes 60+ frameworks for assess-once-report-many
Risk-based tailoring via structured organizational factors
Five-level maturity model from policy to managed
Centralized certification by Authorized External Assessors
MyCSF platform enables inheritance and remediation tracking

Cybersecurity

SAMA CSF

SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Six-level maturity model targeting Level 3 minimum
Four domains with 114+ principle-based controls
Mandatory governance by board and CISO
Third-party risk management requirements
Alignment with NIST, ISO 27001 standards

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

HITRUST CSF Details

What It Is

HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF) is a certifiable, risk-based control framework harmonizing requirements from 60+ authoritative sources like HIPAA, NIST, ISO 27001, and PCI DSS. It provides threat-adaptive security and privacy controls tailored to organizational risk.

Key Components

19 assessment domains covering governance, technical safeguards, and resilience.
14 categories, 49 objectives, ~156 specifications with tiered implementation levels.
Five-level maturity model (Policy, Procedure, Implemented, Measured, Managed).
Tiered certifications: e1 (44 controls), i1 (182 requirements), r2 (risk-tailored).

Why Organizations Use It

Demonstrates multi-regulatory compliance via "assess once, report many."
Builds stakeholder trust in healthcare/finance with independent validation.
Reduces third-party risk, audit fatigue, and breach risk (99.4% breach-free).
Enables market differentiation and insurance benefits.

Implementation Overview

Multi-phase: scoping in MyCSF, gap analysis, remediation, validated assessment by Authorized Assessors. Suited for regulated industries; requires evidence automation, inheritance from cloud providers. Timelines 6-18 months; ongoing monitoring essential.

SAMA CSF Details

What It Is

SAMA Cyber Security Framework (CSF) Version 1.0 is a mandatory regulatory framework issued by the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority in May 2017. It prescribes cybersecurity governance, controls, and maturity for SAMA-regulated financial institutions like banks and insurers. Principle-based and risk-oriented, it focuses on detecting, resisting, responding to, and recovering from cyber threats across information assets.

Key Components

Four domains: Leadership & Governance, Risk Management & Compliance, Operations & Technology, Third-Party Security.
Subdomains with principles, objectives, and control considerations (114+ subcontrols).
Six-level maturity model (Level 3 minimum: structured policies/standards/procedures, KPIs).
Aligned with NIST, ISO 27001; self-assessment and SAMA audits for compliance.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for Saudi financial entities to avoid penalties, audits, fines.
Enhances resilience, reduces incidents, supports Vision 2030 digital growth.
Builds trust, enables partnerships, optimizes risk management via KRIs.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, risk assessment, control roadmap, deployment, monitoring.
Targets banks/insurers in Saudi Arabia; all sizes via maturity progression.
Self-assessments, internal audits; no external certification but SAMA review.

Key Differences

Aspect	HITRUST CSF	SAMA CSF
Scope	19 domains, 14 categories, maturity-scored controls	4 domains, principle-based controls with maturity levels
Industry	Healthcare primary, industry-agnostic globally	Saudi financial sector only (banks, insurance)
Nature	Voluntary certifiable framework with assurance program	Mandatory regulatory framework for compliance
Testing	External assessors, MyCSF platform, certification valid 1-2 years	Periodic self-assessments, SAMA audits and reviews
Penalties	Loss of certification, no legal penalties	Regulatory fines, enforcement actions by SAMA

Scope

HITRUST CSF

19 domains, 14 categories, maturity-scored controls

SAMA CSF

4 domains, principle-based controls with maturity levels

Industry

HITRUST CSF

Healthcare primary, industry-agnostic globally

SAMA CSF

Saudi financial sector only (banks, insurance)

Nature

HITRUST CSF

Voluntary certifiable framework with assurance program

SAMA CSF

Mandatory regulatory framework for compliance

Testing

HITRUST CSF

External assessors, MyCSF platform, certification valid 1-2 years

SAMA CSF

Periodic self-assessments, SAMA audits and reviews

Penalties

HITRUST CSF

Loss of certification, no legal penalties

SAMA CSF

Regulatory fines, enforcement actions by SAMA

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about HITRUST CSF and SAMA CSF

HITRUST CSF FAQ

SAMA CSF FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage

Discover 5 ways modern compliance software turns evolving regulations into strategic advantage. Automate monitoring, cut 3x non-compliance costs, stay audit-rea

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2

Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp

From SOC to AI-Native CDC: Redefining Triage and Response in 2026

Explore the shift from SOCs to AI-Native CDCs. Autonomous agents handle Tier 1 triage in 2026, empowering analysts for complex threats. Discover the future of c

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

POPIA vs ISO 19600

Compare POPIA vs ISO 19600: SA's privacy law meets global compliance guidelines. Discover key differences, synergies, and strategies for integrated risk management and enforcement readiness.

HITRUST CSF vs ISO 50001

Explore HITRUST CSF vs ISO 50001: Certifiable cyber framework harmonizing 60+ standards like HIPAA/NIST vs energy mgmt system driving efficiency gains. Key diffs, ROI, pick yours.

K-PIPA vs CMMI

Compare K-PIPA vs CMMI: Korea's strict privacy law meets process maturity excellence. Unlock compliance strategies, breach risks, and integration tips for global success.

HITRUST CSF

SAMA CSF

Quick Verdict

HITRUST CSF

Key Features

SAMA CSF

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

HITRUST CSF Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

SAMA CSF Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

HITRUST CSF FAQ

What is the primary objective of HITRUST CSF?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with HITRUST CSF?

Does HITRUST CSF require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for HITRUST CSF be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with HITRUST CSF?

Can HITRUST CSF be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing HITRUST CSF?

SAMA CSF FAQ

What is the primary objective of SAMA CSF?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SAMA CSF?

Does SAMA CSF require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SAMA CSF be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SAMA CSF?

Can SAMA CSF be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SAMA CSF?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2

From SOC to AI-Native CDC: Redefining Triage and Response in 2026

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

POPIA vs ISO 19600

HITRUST CSF vs ISO 50001

K-PIPA vs CMMI