Standards Comparison

    IATF 16949

    Mandatory
    2016

    Global standard for automotive quality management systems

    VS

    APRA CPS 234

    Mandatory
    2019

    Australian prudential standard for information security resilience

    Quick Verdict

    IATF 16949 drives automotive quality via core tools and certification; APRA CPS 234 mandates financial cyber resilience with board accountability. Automotive suppliers pursue IATF for OEM access; Australian banks/insurers adopt CPS 234 to avoid regulatory penalties.

    Quality Management

    IATF 16949

    IATF 16949:2016 Automotive Quality Management Systems

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates core tools: APQP, FMEA, PPAP, MSA, SPC
    • Top management must manage, not delegate, quality
    • Risk-based planning with operational data analysis
    • Robust supplier monitoring and second-party audits
    • Product safety processes and warranty management
    Information Security

    APRA CPS 234

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Board ultimate responsibility for information security
    • 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents
    • Systematic independent testing of controls
    • Third-party capability and control assessments
    • Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    IATF 16949 Details

    What It Is

    IATF 16949:2016 is an international certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in automotive production and service parts. Built on ISO 9001:2015, it adds sector-specific requirements for defect prevention, variation reduction, and supply chain consistency using a risk-based, process-oriented approach aligned with PDCA.

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4–10 mirroring ISO 9001, plus automotive supplements.
    • Mandatory **core toolsAPQP, FMEA, Control Plans, MSA, SPC, PPAP.
    • Focus on product safety, supplier management, CSRs, and leadership accountability.
    • Certification via IATF-approved bodies with staged audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Meets OEM contractual demands for supply chain access.
    • Reduces warranty costs, recalls, and COPQ through prevention.
    • Enhances competitiveness, stakeholder trust, and operational efficiency.
    • Drives continual improvement and risk mitigation.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, core tool deployment, training, audits.
    • Applies to automotive sites, remote supports, suppliers.
    • Timelines 6–36 months; requires leadership commitment, digital tools.

    APRA CPS 234 Details

    What It Is

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a mandatory prudential regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority for regulated financial entities. Effective 1 July 2019, it requires maintaining information security capabilities commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities to minimize impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of information assets, including those managed by third parties. It employs a risk-based, assurance-driven model emphasizing governance, testing, and rapid notification.

    Key Components

    Core elements include board ultimate responsibility (para 13), defined roles (para 14), asset classification by criticality/sensitivity (para 20), commensurate controls across asset lifecycles (para 21), incident response plans with annual testing (paras 23-26), systematic independent testing (paras 27-31), internal audit assurance (paras 32-34), and APRA notifications (72 hours for material incidents, 10 business days for weaknesses). No fixed control count; proportional to risk, aligned with CIA principles.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Driven by legal obligations under banking/insurance acts to avoid penalties and supervision. Enhances cyber resilience, operational continuity, third-party risk management, and prudential outcomes. Builds customer trust, reduces incident impacts, and supports competitive positioning in financial services.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: gap analysis, governance/policy setup, asset inventory/classification, control deployment, testing/assurance programs, ongoing monitoring. Applies to APRA-regulated entities (banks, insurers, super funds) regardless of size; requires demonstrable evidence via internal audits, no external certification but subject to APRA supervision.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    IATF 16949
    Automotive QMS with core tools, supplier management
    APRA CPS 234
    Information security governance, cyber resilience

    Industry

    IATF 16949
    Global automotive supply chain
    APRA CPS 234
    Australian financial services sector

    Nature

    IATF 16949
    Voluntary certification standard
    APRA CPS 234
    Mandatory prudential regulation

    Testing

    IATF 16949
    Internal audits, core tool validation
    APRA CPS 234
    Systematic independent control testing

    Penalties

    IATF 16949
    Loss of certification, OEM exclusion
    APRA CPS 234
    Regulatory sanctions, fines, enforcement

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about IATF 16949 and APRA CPS 234

    IATF 16949 FAQ

    APRA CPS 234 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages