IFS Food
GFSI-benchmarked standard for food safety and quality manufacturing
ISO 14064
International standard for GHG quantification, reporting, and verification
Quick Verdict
IFS Food ensures food safety and quality via GFSI audits for manufacturers; ISO 14064 quantifies GHG emissions for all organizations. Food firms adopt IFS for retailer access; others use ISO 14064 for credible climate reporting and compliance.
IFS Food
IFS Food Version 8
Key Features
- Product and Process Approach with traceability tests
- Minimum 50% audit time on-site in production
- Risk-based HACCP and operational prerequisite programs
- Annual audits with unannounced every third for Star status
- Auditable senior management governance and KO requirements
ISO 14064
ISO 14064: Greenhouse gases
Key Features
- Three-part structure: inventories, projects, verification
- Five principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
- Scopes 1-3 organizational boundary classification
- Risk-based validation and verification processes
- Baseline scenarios and additionality for projects
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
IFS Food Details
What It Is
IFS Food Version 8 is a GFSI-benchmarked certification standard for auditing product and process compliance in food manufacturing. It focuses on food safety, quality, legality, authenticity, and customer requirements using a risk-based Product and Process Approach (PPA) with on-site verification.
Key Components
- Organized into governance, HACCP/PRPs, operational controls (e.g., allergens, fraud, defense), and performance monitoring.
- Over 200 checklist requirements with 10 Knock-Out (KO) criteria.
- Built on HACCP principles, integrated pest management, and annual management reviews.
- Annual site-specific certification via accredited bodies under ISO/IEC 17065.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enables European retailer access and reduces duplicate audits.
- Manages risks like recalls, fraud, and contamination.
- Builds trust through transparent scoring (Higher/Foundation levels) and Star status.
- Drives operational efficiency and continuous improvement.
Implementation Overview
- Phased gap analysis, FSMS development, training, internal audits.
- 6-12 months typical; suits food processors globally.
- Requires PPA audits with 50% on-site time and traceability tests.
ISO 14064 Details
What It Is
ISO 14064 is an international standard family (ISO 14064-1:2018, -2:2019, -3:2019) for greenhouse gas (GHG) quantification, reporting, and assurance. It provides specifications and guidance for organizational inventories (Part 1), project-level reductions/removals (Part 2), and validation/verification (Part 3). The principles-based approach emphasizes relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, and accuracy.
Key Components
- Three interdependent parts covering measurement, projects, and assurance.
- Five core principles mirroring GHG Protocol.
- Scopes 1-3 for organizational boundaries; baseline/additionality for projects.
- Third-party verification model under Part 3, with reasonable/limited assurance levels.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enables regulatory compliance (e.g., CSRD, SB-253) and carbon market access.
- Builds stakeholder trust via credible, auditable GHG statements.
- Drives operational improvements, risk management, and green finance eligibility.
- Enhances reputation and competitive edge in sustainability reporting.
Implementation Overview
- **Phased approachgovernance, boundary-setting, data collection, verification.
- Applies to all sizes/industries; integrates with ISO 14001.
- Requires training, software, and optional certification via accredited verifiers.
Key Differences
| Aspect | IFS Food | ISO 14064 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Food safety, quality, process compliance in manufacturing | GHG emissions quantification, reporting, verification organization-wide |
| Industry | Food manufacturing, packers, global retailers | All sectors with GHG footprints, global applicability |
| Nature | GFSI-benchmarked voluntary certification standard | Voluntary international standard for GHG accounting |
| Testing | Annual on-site product/process audits, traceability tests | Independent validation/verification of GHG inventories |
| Penalties | Certification withdrawal, market access loss | No direct penalties, credibility/reputational risk |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about IFS Food and ISO 14064
IFS Food FAQ
ISO 14064 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
The Service-Oriented SOC: Leveraging Maturity Assessments to Guarantee SLOs and Operational Predictability
Transform your SOC into a service provider using maturity assessments to standardize workflows, guarantee SLOs, and ensure predictability amid turnover and risi
HITRUST CSF MyCSF Platform Deep Dive: Automating Evidence Collection for Continuous R2 Renewal in Multi-Regulated Environments 2025
Unpack MyCSF's AI features for HITRUST CSF: automate evidence tagging, maturity scoring & monitoring for R2 renewals amid 2025 regs. CISOs in healthcare/fintech
CMMC Level 2 Implementation Guide for Small DIB Contractors: First 5 Steps to C3PAO Certification with Infographic
Actionable CMMC Level 2 guide for small DIB contractors: 5-step roadmap to C3PAO certification with infographic on timelines, costs & POA&Ms. Achieve DoD compli
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
WCAG vs ISO 31000
WCAG vs ISO 31000: Compare web accessibility standards (POUR principles, AA criteria) with risk mgmt frameworks for governance, compliance & value creation. Optimize strategy now!
J-SOX vs CMMI
Compare J-SOX vs CMMI: Japan's flexible ICFR rules meet CMMI's maturity model. Key diffs in compliance, IT controls & strategy. Boost global ops—read now!
GRI vs ISO 22301
Compare GRI vs ISO 22301: Impact-focused sustainability reporting meets resilient BCMS. Unlock differences, HES compliance benefits, and pick the best framework now.