ISA 95
International standard for enterprise-control system integration
NIST 800-171
U.S. standard protecting CUI in nonfederal systems.
Quick Verdict
ISA 95 provides integration models for manufacturing-ERP boundaries, enabling semantic consistency. NIST 800-171 mandates CUI security controls for contractors. Manufacturers adopt ISA 95 for operational efficiency; defense firms implement 800-171 for contract compliance.
ISA 95
ANSI/ISA-95 Enterprise-Control System Integration
Key Features
- Purdue-based Levels 0-4 hierarchy defining system boundaries
- Canonical object models for equipment, materials, personnel
- Activity models for manufacturing operations management functions
- Standardized transactions and messaging for Level 3-4 exchanges
- Alias services mapping equivalent identifiers across systems
NIST 800-171
NIST SP 800-171 Protecting CUI in Nonfederal Systems
Key Features
- Protects CUI confidentiality in nonfederal contractor systems
- 17 control families with SSP and POA&M requirements
- Scoped CUI enclave isolation for boundary control
- DFARS-mandated incident reporting within 72 hours
- FedRAMP Moderate equivalence for cloud services
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISA 95 Details
What It Is
ISA-95 (ANSI/ISA-95, IEC 62264) is an international framework for integrating enterprise business systems with manufacturing operations. It uses a Purdue model-based hierarchy (Levels 0-4) to define boundaries, activities, and information exchanges, focusing on the Level 3-4 interface between MES and ERP.
Key Components
- Eight parts covering models, terminology, objects, activities, transactions, messaging, aliases, profiles.
- Equipment, material, personnel, production object models (Parts 2,4).
- Activity models for production, quality, maintenance (Part 3).
- No formal product certification; compliance via architectural alignment and training programs.
Why Organizations Use It
Reduces integration risks, costs, errors; enables semantic consistency, OEE improvements, traceability. Supports IT/OT collaboration, Industry 4.0, regulatory audits in manufacturing. Builds trusted data for analytics, agility, multi-site scalability.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: assessment, canonical modeling, pilots, rollouts. Applies to manufacturing firms globally; requires governance, semantic alignment, security segmentation. Focuses on data stewardship, alias mapping, testing.
NIST 800-171 Details
What It Is
NIST SP 800-171 (Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations) is a U.S. government framework providing security requirements for safeguarding CUI confidentiality in nonfederal systems. It uses a control-based approach tailored from NIST SP 800-53 Moderate baseline, focusing on contractors and supply chains via contractual mandates.
Key Components
- 17 families in Rev 3 (e.g., Access Control, Audit, Supply Chain Risk Management), with ~97-110 requirements.
- Built on FIPS 200 and SP 800-53; includes SSP and POA&M for documentation.
- Compliance via self-assessment or third-party audits using SP 800-171A procedures.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for federal contractors (e.g., DFARS 252.204-7012) handling CUI.
- Reduces breach risks, ensures contract eligibility, builds DoD/CMMC readiness.
- Enhances reputation, supply chain trust, and operational resilience.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: scoping, gap analysis, controls, evidence collection, monitoring.
- Applies to contractors globally; suits SMBs to enterprises via enclaves.
- No central certification; contractual audits, SPRS scoring required. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISA 95 | NIST 800-171 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Enterprise-manufacturing system integration models | CUI confidentiality protection in nonfederal systems |
| Industry | Manufacturing, discrete/continuous/process industries | Defense contractors, federal supply chain organizations |
| Nature | Voluntary reference architecture and models | Contractually mandated security requirements |
| Testing | No formal certification; self-alignment to models | SSP/POA&M assessments, CMMC third-party audits |
| Penalties | No penalties; integration risks/costs | Contract ineligibility, fines, debarment |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISA 95 and NIST 800-171
ISA 95 FAQ
NIST 800-171 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Step-by-Step Implementation Guide to ISO 27701: Building a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) on Your ISO 27001 Foundation
Implement ISO 27701 on your ISO 27001 foundation with this actionable guide. Tackle PII controls, audit evidence, GDPR integration. Templates, checklists for 20
CMMC Cost Calculator: Realistic Budgets for Levels 1-3, C3PAO Fees, and ROI for Small DIB Suppliers
Calculate realistic CMMC costs for Levels 1-3: self-assessments, C3PAO fees, tooling, remediation & ROI. Interactive tool for small DIB suppliers. Get benchmark
Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 14001 vs ISO 17025
Discover ISO 14001 vs ISO 17025: EMS mastery for eco-performance vs lab competence gold standard. Key diffs, benefits & tips to boost compliance. Compare & certify smarter now!
Australian Privacy Act vs AS9110C
Discover Australian Privacy Act vs AS9110C: Compare APPs, NDB scheme & aerospace QMS for MRO compliance. Safeguard data, ensure airworthiness—optimize risks today!
SOC 2 vs PIPEDA
Compare SOC 2 vs PIPEDA: U.S. audit gold standard for security meets Canada's privacy principles. Uncover differences, implementation, and compliance wins for global trust. Dive in now!