ISO 13485
International standard for medical device quality management systems
ISO 30301
International standard for records management systems.
Quick Verdict
ISO 13485 provides rigorous QMS for medical devices ensuring regulatory compliance and patient safety, while ISO 30301 establishes records management systems for any organization to govern evidence creation, retention, and accountability. Companies adopt them for certification, risk mitigation, and operational excellence.
ISO 13485
ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices Quality management systems
Key Features
- Risk-based controls for device safety and compliance
- Full lifecycle coverage from design to post-market
- Mandatory medical device files for traceability
- Explicit regulatory requirements integration
- Process validation where outputs unverifiable
ISO 30301
ISO 30301:2019 Management systems for records requirements
Key Features
- High-Level Structure for MSS integration
- Normative operational controls in Annex A
- Flexible conformity pathways including certification
- Explicit records requirements analysis (Clause 4.1.2)
- Risk-based planning and measurable objectives
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 13485 Details
What It Is
ISO 13485:2016 is an international certification standard specifying quality management system (QMS) requirements for medical devices. Designed for regulatory purposes, it ensures organizations consistently meet customer and regulatory demands across the device lifecycle, using a risk-based process approach.
Key Components
- Clauses 4–8 cover QMS, management responsibility, resources, product realization, and measurement/improvement.
- Emphasizes documented procedures, medical device files, validation, traceability, and post-market surveillance.
- Built on process interactions, risk management (ISO 14971), and continual improvement.
- Third-party certification via accredited bodies with stage audits and surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enables market access (EU MDR, FDA QMSR alignment by 2026).
- Reduces risks like recalls through supplier controls and CAPA.
- Builds stakeholder trust and competitive edge in supply chains.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, documentation, training, validation, audits.
- Applies to manufacturers, suppliers, distributors globally.
- 9–18 months typical; requires eQMS, internal audits, management reviews.
ISO 30301 Details
What It Is
ISO 30301:2019 is an international certification standard titled Information and documentation — Management systems for records — Requirements. It specifies auditable requirements for establishing, implementing, and improving a Management System for Records (MSR). Applicable to any organization, it uses a risk-based, PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach aligned with the ISO High-Level Structure (HLS) for integration with other management systems.
Key Components
- Core clauses 4–10 covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, and improvement.
- Records-specific controls in Clause 8 and Annex A (normative) for lifecycle processes.
- Built on principles of authenticity, reliability, integrity, and usability from ISO 15489.
- Flexible conformity: self-declaration, external confirmation, or third-party certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Ensures compliance with legal/regulatory records obligations.
- Mitigates risks like evidence loss, litigation, and operational disruption.
- Boosts efficiency, transparency, and stakeholder trust.
- Enables integration with ISO 9001, 27001 for competitive advantage.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: gap analysis, policy design, operational controls, audits.
- Suited for all sizes/industries; 9–18 months typical.
- Requires leadership commitment, training, and internal audits.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 13485 | ISO 30301 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Medical device QMS lifecycle controls | Records management system governance |
| Industry | Medical devices and suppliers globally | Any organization worldwide |
| Nature | Voluntary certification standard | Voluntary certification standard |
| Testing | Certification audits, process validation | Internal audits, management reviews |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, regulatory issues | Loss of certification only |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 13485 and ISO 30301
ISO 13485 FAQ
ISO 30301 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
TISAX Tabletop Exercises for ADAS Suppliers: Simulating Prototype IP Leaks and Ransomware in Hybrid Supply Chains (2025 Edition with Hero Scenario Visual)
Master TISAX 'Very High' tabletop exercises for ADAS suppliers with 2024 breach simulations like CAD leaks and ransomware. Get scripts, AAR templates, hybrid ti
Top 10 Reasons CMMC Level 3 Certification Unlocks Competitive Edge for Primes Handling Critical DoD Programs
Discover top 10 reasons CMMC Level 3 certification unlocks competitive edge for DoD primes. Reduced APT risks, procurement prefs, NIST 800-172 compliance via v2
Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles
Transform NIST CSF 2.0 into quantifiable success: Define board-ready KPIs for Functions, build Profile dashboards, track Tier progression. Prove ROI amid cyber
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
APPI vs BREEAM
Compare APPI vs BREEAM: Japan's privacy law meets global sustainability cert. Decode compliance, risks & ROI for data & building pros. Master both now!
RoHS vs APRA CPS 234
Compare RoHS vs APRA CPS 234: EU electronics hazard limits meet Aussie finance cyber rules. Master compliance strategies, risks & global implementation now.
COBIT vs ISO 22301
COBIT vs ISO 22301: IT governance powerhouse (40 objectives, design factors) meets BCMS resilience (PDCA, BIA). Tailor for enterprise IT or disruptions? Optimize now!