ISO 13485
International standard for medical device QMS
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
International standard for AI management systems.
Quick Verdict
ISO 13485 governs medical device quality for regulatory compliance and patient safety, while ISO/IEC 42001:2023 manages AI risks ethically across lifecycles. Companies adopt them for certification, market access, and trustworthy operations in regulated sectors.
ISO 13485
ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices Quality management systems
Key Features
- Risk-based QMS for medical device lifecycle
- Regulatory compliance integration with customer requirements
- Mandatory medical device files for traceability
- Process and software validation requirements
- Post-market surveillance and CAPA processes
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial intelligence management systems
Key Features
- Mandates AI Impact Assessments for high-risk systems
- Annex A: 38 AI-specific controls in 10 themes
- Governs full AI lifecycle to decommissioning
- PDCA and HLS for ISO standards integration
- Third-party risk management and ethical controls
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 13485 Details
What It Is
ISO 13485:2016 is an international certification standard specifying requirements for a quality management system (QMS) tailored to medical devices. Its primary purpose is enabling organizations to consistently meet customer and regulatory requirements across the device lifecycle, using a risk-based approach integrated with ISO 14971.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-8 cover QMS, management responsibility, resources, product realization, and measurement/improvement.
- Emphasizes documented procedures, medical device files, process validation, traceability, and post-market surveillance.
- Built on process approach; allows justified exclusions.
- Third-party certification via accredited bodies with stage audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Ensures regulatory compliance (e.g., EU MDR, FDA QMSR alignment by 2026).
- Reduces risks, recalls, and costs; enables market access.
- Builds stakeholder trust; differentiates in supply chains.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, documentation, training, validation, audits.
- Applies to manufacturers, suppliers, distributors globally.
- 9-18 months typical; requires eQMS, CAPA, supplier controls.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is the world's first international standard for Artificial Intelligence Management Systems (AIMS). This certifiable framework specifies requirements to establish, implement, maintain, and improve responsible AI governance using the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle and High-Level Structure (HLS). It addresses AI lifecycle risks like bias, transparency, and societal impact for all organizations—developers, providers, or users—regardless of size or sector.
Key Components
The standard features Clauses 4-10 on context, leadership, planning, support, operations, evaluation, and improvement. Annex A provides 38 AI-specific controls across themes like data governance, transparency, and resiliency. Built on PDCA and HLS, it integrates with ISO 9001 and 27001. Certification involves accredited third-party audits, valid for 3 years with surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
Adopters mitigate AI risks, ensure ethical practices, and align with regulations like the EU AI Act. Benefits include enhanced trust, procurement advantages, insurance discounts, and competitive differentiation via demonstrated responsibility and innovation balance.
Implementation Overview
Phased rollout includes gap analysis, AI Impact Assessments (AIIAs), training, and KPI monitoring. Typical timeline: 6-12 months, accelerated by existing ISO systems. Applicable globally across industries; requires documented processes and audits.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 13485 | ISO/IEC 42001:2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Medical device QMS lifecycle | AI management system lifecycle |
| Industry | Medical devices globally | All AI organizations globally |
| Nature | Voluntary certification standard | Voluntary certification standard |
| Testing | Stage 1/2 audits, surveillance | Stage 1/2 audits, surveillance |
| Penalties | Loss of certification | Loss of certification |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 13485 and ISO/IEC 42001:2023
ISO 13485 FAQ
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Why the SEC Stepped In: The Investor-Driven Push for Cybersecurity Transparency
Discover why the SEC's 2023 cybersecurity rules treat cyber risks as material financial threats. Explore the 'stick and carrot' approach for standardized disclo

The Panoramic View: How Integrated Compliance Monitoring Creates Unprecedented Organizational Visibility and Adaptability
Gain unprecedented organizational visibility with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time alerts, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 adherence, reduce risks, and

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2
Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
RoHS vs ISO 27701
Compare RoHS vs ISO 27701: Decode key differences in hazardous substance limits for EEE compliance vs privacy management systems. Unlock strategies for seamless global regulatory mastery now!
ITIL vs ISO 27032
Compare ITIL vs ISO 27032: ITSM best practices meet cybersecurity guidelines for resilient IT services. Align ops, cut risks, boost efficiency. Discover key diffs now!
POPIA vs ISO 17025
Discover POPIA vs ISO 17025: Compare SA's privacy law with lab competence standards. Unlock key differences, compliance tips & integration for secure data ops. Align today!