ISO 14064 vs AS9100
ISO 14064
International standards for GHG quantification, reporting, verification
AS9100
International standard for aerospace quality management systems.
Quick Verdict
ISO 14064 provides GHG quantification, reporting, and verification for all organizations seeking climate credibility, while AS9100 delivers aerospace-specific quality management for aviation/space/defense firms ensuring product safety and supply chain integrity. Companies adopt them for stakeholder trust and market access.
ISO 14064
ISO 14064 GHG quantification and reporting standards
Key Features
- Three-part modular framework for GHG inventories, projects, assurance
- Five core principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
- Organizational boundaries via equity share or control approaches
- Risk-based validation/verification with materiality assessment
- Supports Scope 1-3 emissions and removals quantification
AS9100
AS9100 Rev E: Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, Defense
Key Features
- Configuration management for product integrity
- Product safety processes across lifecycle
- Counterfeit parts prevention controls
- Operational risk management in Clause 8
- Enhanced supplier evaluation and monitoring
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 14064 Details
What It Is
ISO 14064 (Parts 1:2018, 2:2019, 3:2019) is an international standard family specifying requirements for GHG quantification, reporting, and assurance. It provides a modular, principle-based framework for organizational inventories, project reductions, and independent verification, emphasizing credible, comparable data.
Key Components
- **Part 1Organizational GHG inventories with boundaries, Scopes 1-3, data quality.
- **Part 2Project baselines, additionality, monitoring for net benefits.
- **Part 3Risk-based validation/verification, competence, assurance levels.
- Core: Five principles (relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy); aligns with GHG Protocol; voluntary third-party assurance.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives regulatory readiness (CSRD, SB-253), investor trust, carbon market access. Mitigates greenwashing risks, identifies abatement opportunities, enhances supply-chain credibility and decarbonization strategies.
Implementation Overview
Phased: governance, boundaries, data systems, reporting, verification. Suits all sizes/industries globally; 6-12 months typical; focuses on audit trails, Scope 3 prioritization.
AS9100 Details
What It Is
AS9100 Rev E (IAQG 9100:2024) is the international quality management system (QMS) standard for aviation, space, and defense organizations. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements, using a process-based, risk-based thinking approach across 10 clauses to ensure product safety and supply chain integrity.
Key Components
- Core clauses: Context, Leadership, Planning, Support, Operation, Performance Evaluation, Improvement.
- Aerospace additions: Configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit parts prevention (8.1.4), operational risk management.
- Built on Annex SL structure; requires certification via accredited third-party audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandated by OEMs for market access and supplier qualification.
- Reduces defects, improves delivery, enhances traceability and risk mitigation.
- Builds stakeholder trust via OASIS database visibility; drives cost savings and competitiveness.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, Stage 1/2 certification.
- Applies to manufacturers, designers, MROs globally; 6-18 months typical, with annual surveillance.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 14064 | AS9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | GHG emissions quantification, reporting, verification | Aerospace quality management system |
| Industry | All organizations worldwide | Aviation, space, defense sectors |
| Nature | Voluntary GHG standard family | Voluntary certification standard |
| Testing | Third-party validation/verification optional | Accredited certification audits required |
| Penalties | Loss of credibility, no legal penalties | Loss of certification, market exclusion |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 14064 and AS9100
ISO 14064 FAQ
AS9100 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The NIS2 "FTE Trap": Why 5 Analysts for 24/7 Security is Actually 8 (and Why the Board Needs to Know)
Exposed: NIS2 FTE Trap math shows 5 analysts fail 24/7 coverage due to sickness, training, leave & 2026 churn. Line-by-line breakdown for compliance. Alert your

Practical Implementation Blueprint for Regulation S-K Item 106: Cybersecurity Governance and Risk Management Disclosures in 10-Ks
Step-by-step guide for Item 106 cybersecurity disclosures in 10-Ks: risk management, board oversight, Inline XBRL templates (Dec 2024 compliance). Templates for

Top 10 Reasons ISO 27701 is the Ultimate Privacy Boost for Your ISO 27001 ISMS in 2025
Extend ISO 27001 with ISO 27701 for ultimate privacy governance amid GDPR & AI regs. Discover top 10 advantages like integrated audits to future-proof your ISMS
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Explore More Comparisons
See how ISO 14064 and AS9100 compare against other standards