GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/ISO 14064 vs AS9100
    Standards Comparison

    ISO 14064 vs AS9100

    ISO 14064

    Voluntary
    2018

    International standards for GHG quantification, reporting, verification

    VS

    AS9100

    Mandatory
    2016

    International standard for aerospace quality management systems.

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 14064 provides GHG quantification, reporting, and verification for all organizations seeking climate credibility, while AS9100 delivers aerospace-specific quality management for aviation/space/defense firms ensuring product safety and supply chain integrity. Companies adopt them for stakeholder trust and market access.

    Greenhouse Gas Accounting

    ISO 14064

    ISO 14064 GHG quantification and reporting standards

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Three-part modular framework for GHG inventories, projects, assurance
    • Five core principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
    • Organizational boundaries via equity share or control approaches
    • Risk-based validation/verification with materiality assessment
    • Supports Scope 1-3 emissions and removals quantification
    Quality Management

    AS9100

    AS9100 Rev E: Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, Defense

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Configuration management for product integrity
    • Product safety processes across lifecycle
    • Counterfeit parts prevention controls
    • Operational risk management in Clause 8
    • Enhanced supplier evaluation and monitoring

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 14064 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 14064 (Parts 1:2018, 2:2019, 3:2019) is an international standard family specifying requirements for GHG quantification, reporting, and assurance. It provides a modular, principle-based framework for organizational inventories, project reductions, and independent verification, emphasizing credible, comparable data.

    Key Components

    • **Part 1Organizational GHG inventories with boundaries, Scopes 1-3, data quality.
    • **Part 2Project baselines, additionality, monitoring for net benefits.
    • **Part 3Risk-based validation/verification, competence, assurance levels.
    • Core: Five principles (relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy); aligns with GHG Protocol; voluntary third-party assurance.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives regulatory readiness (CSRD, SB-253), investor trust, carbon market access. Mitigates greenwashing risks, identifies abatement opportunities, enhances supply-chain credibility and decarbonization strategies.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: governance, boundaries, data systems, reporting, verification. Suits all sizes/industries globally; 6-12 months typical; focuses on audit trails, Scope 3 prioritization.

    AS9100 Details

    What It Is

    AS9100 Rev E (IAQG 9100:2024) is the international quality management system (QMS) standard for aviation, space, and defense organizations. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements, using a process-based, risk-based thinking approach across 10 clauses to ensure product safety and supply chain integrity.

    Key Components

    • Core clauses: Context, Leadership, Planning, Support, Operation, Performance Evaluation, Improvement.
    • Aerospace additions: Configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit parts prevention (8.1.4), operational risk management.
    • Built on Annex SL structure; requires certification via accredited third-party audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandated by OEMs for market access and supplier qualification.
    • Reduces defects, improves delivery, enhances traceability and risk mitigation.
    • Builds stakeholder trust via OASIS database visibility; drives cost savings and competitiveness.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased approach: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, Stage 1/2 certification.
    • Applies to manufacturers, designers, MROs globally; 6-18 months typical, with annual surveillance.

    Key Differences

    AspectISO 14064AS9100
    ScopeGHG emissions quantification, reporting, verificationAerospace quality management system
    IndustryAll organizations worldwideAviation, space, defense sectors
    NatureVoluntary GHG standard familyVoluntary certification standard
    TestingThird-party validation/verification optionalAccredited certification audits required
    PenaltiesLoss of credibility, no legal penaltiesLoss of certification, market exclusion

    Scope

    ISO 14064
    GHG emissions quantification, reporting, verification
    AS9100
    Aerospace quality management system

    Industry

    ISO 14064
    All organizations worldwide
    AS9100
    Aviation, space, defense sectors

    Nature

    ISO 14064
    Voluntary GHG standard family
    AS9100
    Voluntary certification standard

    Testing

    ISO 14064
    Third-party validation/verification optional
    AS9100
    Accredited certification audits required

    Penalties

    ISO 14064
    Loss of credibility, no legal penalties
    AS9100
    Loss of certification, market exclusion

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 14064 and AS9100

    ISO 14064 FAQ

    AS9100 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    The NIS2 "FTE Trap": Why 5 Analysts for 24/7 Security is Actually 8 (and Why the Board Needs to Know)

    The NIS2 "FTE Trap": Why 5 Analysts for 24/7 Security is Actually 8 (and Why the Board Needs to Know)

    Exposed: NIS2 FTE Trap math shows 5 analysts fail 24/7 coverage due to sickness, training, leave & 2026 churn. Line-by-line breakdown for compliance. Alert your

    Practical Implementation Blueprint for Regulation S-K Item 106: Cybersecurity Governance and Risk Management Disclosures in 10-Ks

    Practical Implementation Blueprint for Regulation S-K Item 106: Cybersecurity Governance and Risk Management Disclosures in 10-Ks

    Step-by-step guide for Item 106 cybersecurity disclosures in 10-Ks: risk management, board oversight, Inline XBRL templates (Dec 2024 compliance). Templates for

    Top 10 Reasons ISO 27701 is the Ultimate Privacy Boost for Your ISO 27001 ISMS in 2025

    Top 10 Reasons ISO 27701 is the Ultimate Privacy Boost for Your ISO 27001 ISMS in 2025

    Extend ISO 27001 with ISO 27701 for ultimate privacy governance amid GDPR & AI regs. Discover top 10 advantages like integrated audits to future-proof your ISMS

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how ISO 14064 and AS9100 compare against other standards

    Other ISO 14064 Comparisons

    • FSSC 22000 vs ISO 14064
    • ISO 14001 vs ISO 14064
    • SQF vs ISO 14064
    • CAA vs ISO 14064
    • RoHS vs ISO 14064

    Other AS9100 Comparisons

    • EPA vs AS9100
    • SQF vs AS9100
    • WCAG vs AS9100
    • ISO 14001 vs AS9100
    • RoHS vs AS9100
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved