ISO 14064
International standards for GHG quantification, reporting, verification
IATF 16949
International standard for automotive quality management systems.
Quick Verdict
ISO 14064 provides GHG measurement, reporting, and assurance for all organizations seeking climate credibility, while IATF 16949 mandates rigorous quality systems for automotive suppliers to ensure defect-free production and supply chain reliability.
ISO 14064
ISO 14064: Greenhouse gases quantification standards
Key Features
- Modular three-part structure for inventories, projects, verification
- Five core principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
- Scope 1-3 boundaries with equity/operational control approaches
- Risk-based validation/verification processes in Part 3
- Alignment with GHG Protocol for global comparability
IATF 16949
IATF 16949:2016 Automotive Quality Management Standard
Key Features
- Mandates core tools: APQP, FMEA, MSA, SPC, PPAP
- Risk-based thinking with contingency planning
- Top management non-delegable QMS accountability
- Robust supplier development and second-party audits
- Product safety processes and warranty management
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 14064 Details
What It Is
ISO 14064 is an international standard family (Parts 1-3:2018-2019) for GHG quantification, reporting, and assurance. It provides a modular framework for organizations to develop credible inventories, project reductions, and third-party verification using principles-based approaches.
Key Components
- **Part 1Organizational inventories with Scope 1-3 boundaries.
- **Part 2Project-level reductions/removals with baselines.
- **Part 3Validation/verification with risk assessment.
- Five principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy.
- Voluntary third-party assurance model.
Why Organizations Use It
Supports regulatory compliance (e.g., CSRD, SB-253), investor disclosures, carbon markets. Enhances credibility, reduces greenwashing risks, drives efficiency via data insights. Builds stakeholder trust through verifiable claims.
Implementation Overview
Phased: governance, boundary setting, data collection, verification. Applies to all sizes/industries globally. Involves software, training, audits; 6-12 months typical.
IATF 16949 Details
What It Is
IATF 16949:2016 is the international quality management system standard for automotive production and relevant service parts, built on ISO 9001:2015 with automotive-specific requirements. Its primary purpose is defect prevention, variation reduction, and waste elimination in the supply chain. It employs a process-based, risk-thinking approach aligned with PDCA cycles.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10 mirroring ISO 9001, plus supplements like product safety, CSRs, core tools (APQP, FMEA, MSA, SPC, PPAP, Control Plans).
- Over 30 automotive-focused areas including supplier management, contingency planning, warranty systems.
- Certification via IATF-recognized bodies with staged audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets OEM contractual demands for supply chain access.
- Reduces COPQ, warranty costs, recalls via prevention.
- Enhances competitiveness, stakeholder trust in automotive sectors.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, core tool deployment, training, audits.
- Targets automotive suppliers globally; 12-18 months typical.
- Requires third-party certification, internal audits, management reviews. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 14064 | IATF 16949 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | GHG quantification, reporting, verification | Automotive quality management systems |
| Industry | All sectors worldwide | Automotive supply chain only |
| Nature | Voluntary GHG standard family | Certification QMS standard |
| Testing | Independent validation/verification | Third-party certification audits |
| Penalties | Loss of credibility, no legal fines | Loss of OEM contracts, certification revocation |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 14064 and IATF 16949
ISO 14064 FAQ
IATF 16949 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions
Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber
How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)
Deploy CIS Controls v8.1 as a control backbone for NIS2 & DORA compliance. Step-by-step roadmap (IG1→IG2), deliverables, metrics & evidence model for hybrid/clo
The SOC Maturity Roadmap: A 5-Step Blueprint for Scaling from Ad-Hoc to Optimized Operations
Unlock SOC excellence with our 5-step maturity roadmap. Compare SOC-CMM, NIST CSF, and CMMC frameworks to scale from ad-hoc to automated operations. Start your
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 14001 vs CIS Controls
Discover ISO 14001 vs CIS Controls: Compare the EMS standard for environmental excellence with cybersecurity's 18 prioritized safeguards. Reduce risks, ensure compliance—unlock integrated strategies now!
PIPL vs PRINCE2
Explore PIPL vs PRINCE2: China's strict data privacy law meets structured project mgmt. Compare compliance, governance risks & strategies for global success now!
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs MAS TRM
Unpack MLPS 2.0 vs MAS TRM: China's graded cyber regime meets Singapore's tech risk guidelines. Key compliance diffs, controls & enforcement for Asia ops. Compare now!