ISO 14064
International standards for GHG quantification, reporting, verification
ISO 30301
International standard for records management systems.
Quick Verdict
ISO 14064 quantifies and verifies GHG emissions for climate reporting, while ISO 30301 establishes records management systems for evidence governance. Companies adopt ISO 14064 for regulatory compliance and investor trust; ISO 30301 for legal defensibility and operational accountability.
ISO 14064
ISO 14064 GHG quantification, reporting, verification standards
Key Features
- Modular three-part structure for inventories, projects, verification
- Five core principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
- Defines Scope 1-3 boundaries and emission sources
- Risk-based validation/verification processes in Part 3
- Aligns with GHG Protocol for regulatory compliance
ISO 30301
ISO 30301:2019 Management systems for records requirements
Key Features
- High-Level Structure for integrated management systems
- Normative Annex A for records lifecycle controls
- Explicit records requirements in organizational context
- Top management leadership and accountability
- Flexible conformity pathways including certification
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 14064 Details
What It Is
ISO 14064 is an international standard family (Parts 1-3:2018-2019) for GHG quantification, reporting, and assurance. It provides a modular framework for organizations to develop credible GHG inventories (Part 1), project reductions/removals (Part 2), and independent validation/verification (Part 3). Core approach emphasizes **five principlesrelevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy.
Key Components
- **Part 1Organizational boundaries, Scope 1-3 emissions, data quality.
- **Part 2Project baselines, additionality, monitoring.
- **Part 3Risk-based assurance, materiality, evidence gathering. Built on GHG Protocol alignment; no fixed controls but principle-driven requirements. Compliance via third-party verification, not certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Supports regulatory compliance (e.g., CSRD, SB-253), investor trust, carbon markets. Mitigates greenwashing risks, enables decarbonization strategies, enhances procurement qualification and stakeholder credibility.
Implementation Overview
Phased: governance, boundary-setting, data systems, verification. Applies to all sizes/industries; 6-12 months typical. Requires ISO 14065-accredited verifiers for assurance.
ISO 30301 Details
What It Is
ISO 30301:2019 (Information and documentation — Management systems for records — Requirements) is an international, certifiable management system standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving a Management System for Records (MSR). It ensures organizations create and control reliable evidence of business activities, using a High-Level Structure (HLS) and risk-based approach aligned with ISO 15489 principles.
Key Components
- **Clauses 4–10Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- **Clause 8 & Annex A (normative)Records lifecycle controls (creation, capture, access, retention, disposition).
- Core principles: Authenticity, reliability, integrity, usability.
- Conformity pathways: Self-declaration, external confirmation, third-party certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Strengthens compliance, auditability, transparency.
- Mitigates risks (loss, alteration, noncompliance).
- Boosts efficiency, decision-making, stakeholder trust.
- Integrates with ISO 9001, 27001 for governance.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: Gap analysis, policy design, operational controls, audits.
- Suited for any organization, scalable by size/industry.
- Typical 12-18 months; certification via accredited bodies.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 14064 | ISO 30301 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | GHG emissions quantification, reporting, verification | Records management systems governance and controls |
| Industry | All sectors worldwide, any organization size | All sectors worldwide, any organization size |
| Nature | Voluntary certification standard family (Parts 1-3) | Voluntary certifiable management system standard |
| Testing | Third-party validation/verification (ISO 14064-3) | Internal audits, management review, certification audits |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, loss of credibility/certification | No legal penalties, loss of certification/trust |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 14064 and ISO 30301
ISO 14064 FAQ
ISO 30301 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Step-by-Step Implementation Guide to ISO 27701: Building a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) on Your ISO 27001 Foundation
Implement ISO 27701 on your ISO 27001 foundation with this actionable guide. Tackle PII controls, audit evidence, GDPR integration. Templates, checklists for 20

SEC Cybersecurity Rules Implementation Guide: Mastering Form 8-K Item 1.05 Materiality Determination and 4-Business-Day Reporting Workflow
Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 compliance with step-by-step materiality assessment, incident workflows & Inline XBRL tagging. Beat the 4-business-day clock. Esse

SOC 2 for Bootstrapped SaaS: Lazy Founder's Automation Roadmap with Vanta/Drata Templates
Bootstrapped SaaS founders: Achieve SOC 2 Type 2 in 3 months with Vanta automation (cuts 70% manual work). Free templates, workflows, screenshots, metrics & Sig
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 22000 vs Basel III
Discover ISO 22000 vs Basel III: Food safety standard meets banking reforms. Key differences in risk management, PDCA/HLS vs capital/liquidity. Master compliance now!
CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs SAMA CSF
CSL vs SAMA CSF: China's data localization law vs Saudi's maturity framework. Unlock compliance strategies, risks, pitfalls & advantages for global ops. Compare now!
SAFe vs AS9120B
SAFe vs AS9120B: Scale agile enterprises with SAFe's Lean-Agile principles or ensure aerospace distributor compliance via AS9120B QMS. Compare configs, risks, ROI. Optimize now!