ISO 14064
International standard for GHG quantification, reporting, and verification
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
International standard for AI management systems
Quick Verdict
ISO 14064 provides GHG inventory, project accounting, and verification principles for climate reporting, while ISO/IEC 42001:2023 establishes AI management systems for ethical lifecycle governance. Companies adopt them for credible emissions data and trustworthy AI, enhancing compliance, trust, and market access.
ISO 14064
ISO 14064 Greenhouse gases quantification and reporting
Key Features
- Three-part modular structure for inventories, projects, assurance
- Five core principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
- Defines Scope 1-3 boundaries and organizational consolidation approaches
- Risk-based validation/verification with materiality assessment
- Supports regulatory compliance and third-party assurance statements
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial intelligence — Management system
Key Features
- Mandates AI Impact Assessments for high-risk systems
- 38 AI-specific controls in Annex A
- PDCA cycle across full AI lifecycle
- Integrates with ISO 27001 via High-Level Structure
- Requires leadership commitment and continual improvement
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 14064 Details
What It Is
ISO 14064 is an international standard family (Parts 1-3:2018-2019) for GHG quantification, reporting, and assurance. It provides a modular framework for organizations to develop credible inventories, project reductions, and third-party verification using principle-based approaches emphasizing relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, and accuracy.
Key Components
- **Part 1Organizational inventories with Scope 1-3 boundaries.
- **Part 2Project-level baselines, additionality, monitoring.
- **Part 3Validation/verification with risk assessment, materiality, evidence gathering. Built on five core principles; supports voluntary assurance, no formal certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives regulatory compliance (e.g., CSRD, SB-253), investor trust, carbon market access. Mitigates greenwashing risks, enables decarbonization strategies, enhances stakeholder credibility through auditable data.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: governance, boundary setting, data systems, verification. Applies to all sizes/industries; 6-12 months typical for mid-sized firms. Involves cross-functional teams, software tools, optional ISO 14064-3 assurance by accredited bodies.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is the world's first international standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an Artificial Intelligence Management System (AIMS). It provides a PDCA-based framework to govern AI responsibly across the full lifecycle, addressing risks like bias, transparency, and ethics for any organization involved in AI development, provision, or use.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.
- Annex A with 38 AI-specific controls on data, transparency, integrity, and resiliency.
- Built on High-Level Structure (HLS) for integration with ISO 9001/27001.
- Certification via accredited third-party audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates AI risks, ensures ethical practices, and supports regulations like EU AI Act.
- Builds stakeholder trust, enhances reputation, and drives competitive differentiation.
- Enables innovation while managing opportunities and compliance.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: gap analysis, risk assessments (AIIAs), training, and audits.
- Applicable to all sizes/sectors; 6-12 months typical with existing ISO systems.
- Requires leadership commitment, documented processes, and continual monitoring.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 14064 | ISO/IEC 42001:2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | GHG emissions quantification, reporting, verification | AI management systems, lifecycle governance, ethics |
| Industry | All sectors worldwide, any organization size | All sectors worldwide, AI developers/users/providers |
| Nature | Voluntary international standard family, certification optional | Voluntary international management system standard, certifiable |
| Testing | Third-party validation/verification under Part 3, optional | Internal audits, management reviews, third-party certification |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, loss of credibility/certification | No legal penalties, loss of certification/reputation |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 14064 and ISO/IEC 42001:2023
ISO 14064 FAQ
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
TISAX Tabletop Exercises for EV Battery Suppliers: Ransomware Drill Scripts and AAR Templates with 2025 ENX Podcast Breakdown
Practical TISAX tabletop scripts for EV battery suppliers facing 'Very High' ASLP. Download ransomware AAR templates, get 2024 ENX lessons & 2025 podcast on VDA
NIST CSF 2.0: Key Enhancements and How They Address Evolving Cyber Threats
Explore NIST CSF 2.0 updates: Govern function, supply chain security, SME playbooks for ransomware & AI threats. Boost your cyber defenses now!
Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention
Discover how modern compliance monitoring tools leverage continuous, real-time oversight and automated alerts to shift organizations from reactive problem-solving to proactive threat detection and prevention, safeguarding against emerging risks before they escalate.
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
NIST CSF vs ISO 21001
Compare NIST CSF vs ISO 21001: Cyber risk mastery meets ed quality excellence. Uncover differences, benefits & pick the ideal framework for resilient ops now.
PIPEDA vs ISO 22000
Discover PIPEDA vs ISO 22000 differences: Canada's privacy law (10 principles) vs global FSMS (HLS, PDCA). Master compliance strategies for food/privacy risks. Act now!
SOX vs MAS TRM
SOX vs MAS TRM: Compare US corporate governance mandates with Singapore's tech risk guidelines. Unlock strategies for compliance, resilience & global finance mastery. Read now!