ISO 14064
International standards for GHG quantification, reporting, verification
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
U.S. SEC regulation for cybersecurity incident disclosures
Quick Verdict
ISO 14064 provides voluntary GHG accounting standards for global organizations seeking credible emissions reporting, while U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules mandate rapid incident disclosures for public companies to ensure investor transparency on cyber risks.
ISO 14064
ISO 14064 Greenhouse gases quantification standards
Key Features
- Modular three-part structure for inventories, projects, verification
- Five core principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
- Defines organizational boundaries and Scopes 1-3 emissions
- Risk-based validation/verification with reasonable/limited assurance
- Aligns with GHG Protocol for regulatory compliance readiness
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure
Key Features
- Four-business-day material incident disclosure on Form 8-K
- Annual risk management and governance in Item 106
- Board oversight and management role disclosures
- Inline XBRL tagging for comparability
- Third-party risk processes inclusion
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 14064 Details
What It Is
ISO 14064 is the international standard family (ISO 14064-1:2018, -2:2019, -3:2019) for greenhouse gas (GHG) quantification, reporting, and verification. It provides a modular framework for organizations to develop credible GHG inventories, project reductions, and assurance processes using a principle-based approach emphasizing relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, and accuracy.
Key Components
- **Three partsPart 1 (organizational inventories), Part 2 (projects), Part 3 (validation/verification).
- Core elements include boundary setting (organizational/operational, Scopes 1-3), baseline scenarios, monitoring plans, and risk-based assurance.
- Built on GHG Protocol alignment; no fixed controls but structured workflows for data quality and uncertainty management.
- Compliance via third-party verification statements, not traditional certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets regulatory demands (e.g., CSRD, SB-253) and enables emissions trading, green finance.
- Drives internal efficiencies, Scope 3 hotspot identification, stakeholder trust.
- Mitigates greenwashing risks through independent assurance.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: governance, boundary design, data systems, reporting, verification.
- Suited for all sizes/industries; 6-12 months typical for mid-sized firms.
- Requires cross-functional teams, software tools, optional ISO 14065-accredited verifiers.
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules Details
What It Is
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules (Release No. 33-11216) is a regulation mandating standardized disclosures for public companies under the Exchange Act. Its primary purpose is to enhance investor protection through timely, comparable information on cybersecurity incidents, risk management, strategy, and governance. It adopts a materiality-based approach aligned with securities law precedents like TSC Industries v. Northway.
Key Components
- **Incident disclosureForm 8-K Item 1.05 requires reporting material incidents within four business days of materiality determination.
- **Annual disclosuresRegulation S-K Item 106 covers risk processes, third-party oversight, board/management roles.
- Inline XBRL tagging for structured data.
- Built on existing disclosure controls; no fixed controls, emphasizes processes over technical details.
Why Organizations Use It
Public companies comply to meet legal obligations, avoid enforcement actions (e.g., fines, injunctions), reduce information asymmetry, and build investor confidence. Benefits include integrated risk management, board oversight enhancement, and market efficiency.
Implementation Overview
Involves cross-functional playbooks, materiality frameworks, incident workflows, and XBRL readiness. Applies to all Exchange Act registrants (domestic, FPIs, SRCs, EGCs). No certification; focus on internal controls, phased compliance from Dec 2023.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 14064 | U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | GHG emissions quantification, reporting, verification | Cybersecurity incident disclosure, risk governance |
| Industry | All organizations worldwide (voluntary) | U.S. public companies (mandatory filers) |
| Nature | Voluntary international standard family | Mandatory SEC regulatory disclosure rules |
| Testing | Third-party validation/verification (ISO 14064-3) | Internal disclosure controls, SEC enforcement |
| Penalties | Loss of credibility/certification | SEC fines, enforcement actions, litigation |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 14064 and U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
ISO 14064 FAQ
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation
Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc

From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day
Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365
Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 27032 vs ISO 22301
Discover ISO 27032 vs ISO 22301: Internet cybersecurity guidelines vs business continuity standards. Integrate for resilient ops, cut risks, boost compliance. Compare key diffs now!
CMMC vs IATF 16949
Compare CMMC vs IATF 16949: DoD cybersecurity tiers meet automotive QMS rigor. Explore levels, gaps, frameworks & pitfalls for dual compliance. Secure contracts now!
PIPL vs TOGAF
PIPL vs TOGAF: Compare China's GDPR-like data privacy law with the top enterprise architecture framework. Master compliance, strategies & implementation for global success. Dive in now!