ISO 27032
International guidelines for Internet cybersecurity and stakeholder collaboration
ISO 22301
International standard for business continuity management systems.
Quick Verdict
ISO 27032 offers cybersecurity guidelines for Internet ecosystems, while ISO 22301 provides certifiable BCMS requirements for operational resilience. Companies adopt 27032 for collaborative cyberspace defense and 22301 to ensure continuity, minimize downtime, and meet regulatory demands.
ISO 27032
ISO/IEC 27032:2023 Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security
Key Features
- Emphasizes multi-stakeholder collaboration in cyberspace ecosystems
- Provides guidelines for Internet security threats and controls
- Maps recommendations to ISO/IEC 27002 for seamless integration
- Focuses on risk assessment, detection, and incident response
- Promotes non-certifiable advisory complementing ISO 27001
ISO 22301
ISO 22301:2019 Business continuity management systems Requirements
Key Features
- PDCA cycle for continual BCMS improvement
- Business Impact Analysis (BIA) requirements
- Risk assessment and recovery strategies
- Leadership commitment and policy mandates
- Operational testing and performance audits
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 27032 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27032:2023, titled Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security, is an international guidance standard. It provides non-certifiable recommendations for managing Internet security risks in interconnected ecosystems, connecting information security, network security, and critical infrastructure protection. Its risk-based, collaborative approach emphasizes multi-stakeholder roles and integration with standards like ISO/IEC 27001.
Key Components
- Core themes: stakeholder collaboration, risk assessment, incident management, technical/organizational controls.
- Annex A maps Internet threats to ISO/IEC 27002's 93 controls.
- Built on principles of trust, transparency, and continuous improvement (PDCA cycle).
- No certification; focuses on advisory integration into ISMS.
Why Organizations Use It
Adoption reduces breach risks, enhances resilience, and supports regulations like NIS2/GDPR. Benefits include operational efficiency, stakeholder trust, competitive differentiation, and insurance savings. It addresses ecosystem threats like DDoS and supply-chain attacks.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, risk modeling, control deployment, monitoring. Suited for enterprises with online presence across sizes/industries. Involves stakeholder mapping, training, audits; integrates with existing frameworks without standalone certification.
ISO 22301 Details
What It Is
ISO 22301:2019 is the international standard titled Societal security — Business continuity management systems — Requirements. It is a certifiable framework specifying requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving a Business Continuity Management System (BCMS). Its primary purpose is to enhance organizational resilience against disruptions like cyberattacks, pandemics, and natural disasters. It employs a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle aligned with Annex SL for integration.
Key Components
- 10 clauses, with Clauses 4-10 forming the auditable core.
- Key elements: Business Impact Analysis (BIA), risk assessment, leadership policy, operational recovery strategies, monitoring, audits, and continual improvement.
- Built on PDCA principles; no fixed controls, flexible to context.
- Certification valid for 3 years with annual surveillance audits.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives resilience, reduces downtime and losses, ensures regulatory compliance (e.g., NIS Directive), manages risks proactively, builds stakeholder trust, and offers competitive edges like lower insurance premiums.
Implementation Overview
Involves gap analysis, BIA, training, testing, and two-stage audits (6-8 weeks). Applicable to all sizes/sectors; leadership buy-in essential. Tools accelerate processes for SMEs to multinationals.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 27032 | ISO 22301 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Internet security and cyberspace ecosystem | Business continuity management system resilience |
| Industry | All with online presence, critical infrastructure | All sectors, critical services, global applicability |
| Nature | Non-certifiable guidance standard | Certifiable management system requirements |
| Testing | Gap analysis, tabletop exercises, audits | BIA, exercises, internal audits, certification |
| Penalties | No direct penalties, reputational risk | No direct penalties, certification loss |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 27032 and ISO 22301
ISO 27032 FAQ
ISO 22301 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Beyond the Checkbox: Why Maturity Assessments are the Secret to Sustainable Compliance
Discover why maturity assessments beat binary compliance checks by uncovering hidden gaps and enabling continuous improvement for sustainable success. Read now!
Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles
Transform NIST CSF 2.0 into quantifiable success: Define board-ready KPIs for Functions, build Profile dashboards, track Tier progression. Prove ROI amid cyber
Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses
Discover how compliance monitoring tools empower lean teams to automate real-time checks, ensure GDPR/HIPAA/SOC 2 compliance, and scale oversight efficiently. T
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
HITRUST CSF vs FedRAMP
Compare HITRUST CSF vs FedRAMP: certifiable, risk-tailored framework harmonizing 60+ standards vs NIST-based federal cloud authorization. Discover key differences, maturity scoring, and choose the right path for compliance. (157)
GDPR UK vs ISO 41001
Compare GDPR UK vs ISO 41001: Key differences in data protection vs facility management standards. Discover compliance overlaps, strategies & best practices for integrated systems. Optimize now!
UAE PDPL vs BRC
Discover UAE PDPL vs BRC: Compare UAE data privacy law & food safety standards. Master compliance gaps, strategies & risks for seamless onshore ops. Achieve excellence now!