What is the primary objective of **ISO 17025**?

**ISO/IEC 17025:2017 specifies general requirements for the competence, impartiality, and consistent operation of testing and calibration laboratories.** It ensures technical validity of results through metrological traceability, measurement uncertainty evaluation, validated methods, and controlled processes under Clauses 4–8, enabling global acceptance via ILAC mutual recognition.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 17025**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with ISO/IEC 17025:2017, but accreditation is professionally mandatory for testing and calibration laboratories seeking market acceptance.** Suppliers, regulators, and customers in regulated sectors (e.g., manufacturing, environmental, forensics) reject non-accredited results, as accreditation attests to competence within a defined scope by ILAC-signatory bodies like ANAB or A2LA.

Oes **ISO 17025** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO/IEC 17025:2017 requires accreditation by an external accreditation body, not certification.** Assessments by national bodies (e.g., UKAS, PJLA) include document review, on-site evaluation, witnessed testing, and proficiency testing verification, attesting to technical competence per Clause 7, distinct from ISO 9001 certification.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 17025** be performed?

**ISO/IEC 17025:2017-accredited laboratories undergo surveillance assessments annually and full reassessments every 2 years by the accreditation body.** Internal audits occur at planned intervals per Clause 8.8, with management reviews at least annually (Clause 8.9), plus ongoing proficiency testing and risk-based monitoring.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 17025**?

**Non-compliance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 results in accreditation suspension or withdrawal by the body.** This leads to rejected test/calibration results by customers/regulators, lost contracts, market exclusion, and potential legal/reputational damage from invalid data in safety-critical applications.

An **ISO 17025** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO/IEC 17025:2017 management system requirements (Clause 8, Option B) map directly to ISO 9001:2015.** This enables integration, reusing controls like internal audits and corrective actions, while retaining unique technical elements (Clauses 6–7) for competence, traceability, and uncertainty.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 17025**?

**The first step for ISO/IEC 17025:2017 implementation is a clause-by-clause gap analysis against current practices.** Identify deficiencies in impartiality (Clause 4), resources (Clause 6), processes (Clause 7), and management system (Clause 8), prioritizing high-risk areas like uncertainty evaluation and traceability.

What is the primary objective of **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C's primary objective is to enable aviation maintenance organizations to consistently provide products and services meeting customer and applicable statutory/regulatory requirements while enhancing customer satisfaction through effective QMS application and continual improvement.** It incorporates ISO 9001:2015's Annex SL structure (Clauses 4–10) with aviation-specific additions like configuration management, product safety, counterfeit parts prevention, traceability, preservation, and human factors controls, ensuring continuing airworthiness in MRO environments.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C applies to aviation maintenance organizations, including repair stations and MRO providers, regardless of size, performing maintenance, repair, overhaul, or continuing airworthiness services.** Target entities include independent repair stations, airline maintenance departments, engine/avionics shops, and OEMs with autonomous MRO operations; certification is often contractually required by OEMs, airlines, and regulators for OASIS listing and supply-chain access, though not legally mandated independently.

Does **AS9110C** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9110C requires third-party certification through accredited bodies, with the QMS fully operational for at least three months, including a full internal audit cycle and management review.** External audits comprise Stage 1 (documentation review) and Stage 2 (implementation effectiveness), followed by annual surveillance and triennial recertification, verifying Clauses 4–10 via IAQG-recognized processes.

How often should an assessment for **AS9110C** be performed?

**Internal audits for AS9110C must be performed at planned intervals based on process risk, status, and results, with a full cycle completed before certification.** Management reviews occur regularly (e.g., annually or per business cycle), using performance data; external surveillance audits are annual, with recertification every three years, prioritizing high-risk areas like operational planning (Clause 8).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9110C**?

**Non-compliance with AS9110C risks loss of certification, exclusion from contracts, regulatory sanctions, and operational disruptions.** Impacts include failed supplier qualification (e.g., OASIS delisting), contract termination by OEMs/airlines, potential FAA/EASA Part 145 violations leading to fines or certificate suspension, rework costs, safety incidents, and reputational damage in the aviation supply chain.

An **AS9110C** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**AS9110C follows ISO 9001:2015's Annex SL high-level structure, enabling direct mapping to compatible frameworks sharing Clauses 4–10.** Its PDCA logic, risk-based thinking (Clauses 6.1, 8.1.1), and terminology (e.g., documented information, external providers) support integrated systems, though aviation-specific additions like counterfeit prevention require supplemental controls.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9110C**?

**The first step to implement AS9110C is to define the QMS scope, determining internal/external issues, interested parties, and justifying any non-applicable requirements per Clause 4.** Conduct a gap analysis mapping existing processes to Clauses 4–10, prioritizing aviation controls (e.g., configuration management, risk registers), followed by executive sponsorship and a phased project plan.

ISO 17025 vs AS9110C

Standards Comparison

ISO 17025

Voluntary

2017

International standard for competence of testing and calibration laboratories

AS9110C

Mandatory

2016

Aerospace standard for aviation maintenance quality management.

Quick Verdict

ISO 17025 accredits testing labs for technical competence and impartiality, ensuring valid results trusted globally. AS9110C certifies aerospace MROs for quality management, focusing on airworthiness and safety. Labs adopt ISO 17025 for credibility; MROs use AS9110C for contracts and compliance.

Laboratory Quality

ISO 17025

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for competence of testing and calibration laboratories

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Ensures competence, impartiality, consistent lab operations
Mandates metrological traceability and uncertainty evaluation
Requires ongoing impartiality risk identification/mitigation
Integrates risk-based thinking across all clauses
Enables global accreditation via ILAC mutual recognition

Quality Management

AS9110C

AS9110C: Quality Management Systems Requirements for Aviation Maintenance Organizations

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Risk-based thinking in strategic and operational planning
Configuration management and product traceability controls
Counterfeit and suspect parts prevention requirements
Human factors integration in root cause analysis
Continuing airworthiness and maintenance release processes

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

ISO 17025 Details

What It Is

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 is the international standard specifying general requirements for the competence, impartiality, and consistent operation of testing and calibration laboratories. It applies a risk-based, performance-oriented approach tying management controls to technical validity of results, covering testing, calibration, and sampling activities.

Key Components

Eight main clauses: general (impartiality/confidentiality), structural, resource (personnel, facilities, equipment, traceability), process (methods, validation, reporting), and management system requirements (Option A/B).
Emphasizes metrological traceability, measurement uncertainty, method validation/verification, proficiency testing.
Built on risk-based thinking; accreditation model by ILAC-signatory bodies attesting technical scope.

Why Organizations Use It

Ensures globally accepted results via ILAC MRA, enabling market access.
Meets regulatory/supply chain demands; mitigates risks of invalid data.
Builds trust, reduces rework, supports compliance in safety-critical sectors.

Implementation Overview

Phased PDCA: gap analysis, documentation, technical validation, audits.
Suits labs of all sizes/industries; requires accreditation audits, ongoing surveillance.

AS9110C Details

What It Is

AS9110C (AS9110:2016 Rev C) is an international certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation maintenance organizations (MROs). It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with aerospace-specific requirements for repair stations and continuing airworthiness providers. Its primary purpose is ensuring safe, compliant maintenance of aircraft and components via risk-based thinking, PDCA cycles, and Annex SL structure.

Key Components

Core clauses 4–10 covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Aviation additions: configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, product safety, human factors, traceability, external provider controls.
Emphasizes documented information, competence, and operational risk management (Clauses 6.1, 8.1.1).
Certification via IAQG OASIS database after audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets customer/OEM contracts and regulatory alignments (FAA/EASA Part 145).
Mitigates safety risks, enhances on-time delivery, reduces nonconformities.
Provides market access, stakeholder trust, operational efficiency.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, certification (6-12 months typical).
Applies to MROs globally; requires leadership commitment, risk registers, evidence of operational maturity.

Key Differences

Aspect	ISO 17025	AS9110C
Scope	Testing/calibration lab competence, impartiality, technical validity	Aerospace MRO quality management, maintenance, airworthiness
Industry	Testing/calibration labs all sectors worldwide	Aerospace aviation maintenance organizations globally
Nature	Voluntary accreditation for technical competence	Voluntary certification for QMS compliance
Testing	Proficiency testing, witnessed activities, accreditation body audits	Internal audits, management reviews, certification body audits
Penalties	Loss of accreditation, rejected results	Loss of certification, contract ineligibility

Scope

ISO 17025

Testing/calibration lab competence, impartiality, technical validity

AS9110C

Aerospace MRO quality management, maintenance, airworthiness

Industry

ISO 17025

Testing/calibration labs all sectors worldwide

AS9110C

Aerospace aviation maintenance organizations globally

Nature

ISO 17025

Voluntary accreditation for technical competence

AS9110C

Voluntary certification for QMS compliance

Testing

ISO 17025

Proficiency testing, witnessed activities, accreditation body audits

AS9110C

Internal audits, management reviews, certification body audits

Penalties

ISO 17025

Loss of accreditation, rejected results

AS9110C

Loss of certification, contract ineligibility

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ISO 17025 and AS9110C

ISO 17025 FAQ

AS9110C FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...

Explore a world without mandatory GDPR: How would organizations manage data? What data privacy regs would emerge? Uncover impacts on businesses and privacy laws

The Human-AI Synergy: How Modern Compliance Tools Amplify Your Team's Strategic Impact

Unlock human-AI synergy with modern compliance tools. Automate monitoring, cut non-compliance risks 3x, and boost strategic decision-making. Elevate your team's

Beyond the Boardroom: 5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Elevates Every Department

Discover 5 ways modern compliance software boosts HR, IT, finance & more: automate risks, enhance efficiency, ensure data integrity, stay audit-ready. Elevate y

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

IEC 62443 vs CIS Controls

Compare IEC 62443 vs CIS Controls: OT cybersecurity framework meets broad best practices. Uncover gaps, mappings & strategies for IACS resilience. Secure your ops now!

AS9120B vs ISO 41001

Compare AS9120B vs ISO 41001: Aerospace QMS for distributors meets facility management standard. Uncover key differences in risks, traceability & ops controls. Optimize compliance now!

CMMI vs CIS Controls

Compare CMMI vs CIS Controls: Boost process maturity with CMMI's levels while hardening cyber defenses via CIS safeguards. Achieve predictable ops & resilience—explore now!

ISO 17025

AS9110C

Quick Verdict

ISO 17025

Key Features

AS9110C

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

ISO 17025 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

AS9110C Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 17025 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 17025?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 17025?

Oes ISO 17025 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 17025 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 17025?

An ISO 17025 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 17025?

AS9110C FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9110C?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9110C?

Does AS9110C require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9110C be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9110C?

An AS9110C be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9110C?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...

The Human-AI Synergy: How Modern Compliance Tools Amplify Your Team's Strategic Impact

Beyond the Boardroom: 5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Elevates Every Department

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

IEC 62443 vs CIS Controls

AS9120B vs ISO 41001

CMMI vs CIS Controls