ISO 17025
International standard for competence of testing and calibration laboratories
EN 1090
EU standard for steel and aluminium structural execution
Quick Verdict
ISO 17025 accredits testing labs for competence and impartiality globally, while EN 1090 mandates CE marking for EU structural steel/aluminium via Factory Production Control. Labs seek trust in results; fabricators ensure market access and legal compliance.
ISO 17025
ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for competence of testing and calibration laboratories
Key Features
- Ensures competence, impartiality, and consistent laboratory operations
- Mandates metrological traceability and measurement uncertainty evaluation
- Incorporates risk-based thinking across all requirements
- Structures into 8 elements: general, structural, resources, processes, management
- Enables global accreditation acceptance via ILAC mutual recognition
EN 1090
EN 1090 Execution of steel and aluminium structures
Key Features
- Risk-based Execution Classes (EXC1-EXC4)
- Factory Production Control (FPC) certification
- CE marking via Notified Body surveillance
- Welding quality aligned with ISO 3834
- Material traceability and NDT requirements
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 17025 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 17025:2017 is the international standard specifying general requirements for the competence, impartiality, and consistent operation of testing and calibration laboratories. It applies a risk-based, performance-oriented approach linking management systems to technical validity of results, covering testing, calibration, and sampling activities.
Key Components
- Organized into **8 elementsscope, general (impartiality/confidentiality), structural, resource, process, and management system requirements.
- Emphasizes personnel competence, metrological traceability, measurement uncertainty, method validation, and proficiency testing.
- Built on risk-based thinking; offers Option A (standalone) or Option B (ISO 9001 integration) for management systems.
- Leads to accreditation by ILAC-recognized bodies, attesting technical competence within defined scopes.
Why Organizations Use It
- Ensures global acceptance of results, enabling market access and regulatory compliance.
- Mitigates risks of invalid data impacting safety, finance, and reputation.
- Provides competitive edge through demonstrated credibility and efficiency gains.
- Builds stakeholder trust via impartiality safeguards and traceable outputs.
Implementation Overview
- Phased PDCA approach: gap analysis, documentation, training, validation, audits.
- Suited for labs across industries; requires technical investments in calibration, PT.
- Involves accreditation assessments with witnessed activities and ongoing surveillance.
EN 1090 Details
What It Is
EN 1090 is a harmonized European standard family (EN 1090-1, -2, -3) under the Construction Products Regulation (CPR). It governs execution and conformity assessment of structural steel and aluminium components/kits for construction works. Primary purpose: ensure controlled fabrication, welding, and performance declaration via CE marking. Adopts risk-based scaling through Execution Classes (EXC1–EXC4).
Key Components
- **EN 1090-1Conformity assessment, Factory Production Control (FPC) certification, Declaration of Performance (DoP).
- **EN 1090-2/-3Technical rules for steel/aluminium (materials, welding, tolerances, corrosion protection, NDT).
- Core principles: traceability, welding per ISO 3834, risk-proportional controls.
- Third-party Notified Body certification with ongoing surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for EU market access; enables CE marking, reduces liability, ensures stakeholder trust. Strategic benefits: risk mitigation, quality consistency, competitive bidding advantage.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, FPC build, welding qualification, NB certification (3-12 months). Targets fabricators in construction; requires personnel training, process integration, audits.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 17025 | EN 1090 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Competence of testing/calibration labs | Execution/conformity of steel/aluminium structures |
| Industry | Testing, calibration labs globally | Construction, fabrication in EU/EEA |
| Nature | Voluntary accreditation standard | Mandatory for CE marking under CPR |
| Testing | Proficiency testing, internal audits | Factory audits, surveillance by Notified Body |
| Penalties | Loss of accreditation, market rejection | Market exclusion, legal enforcement fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 17025 and EN 1090
ISO 17025 FAQ
EN 1090 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 10 SOC 2 Mistakes Startups Make (and Fixes with Automation)
Avoid top 10 SOC 2 mistakes like scope creep & evidence gaps. See fail/pass visuals, client quotes, Vanta/Drata automation fixes for bootstrapped startups. Quic
The CIS Controls v8.1 Evidence Pack: What Auditors Ask For (and How to Produce Proof Fast)
Fail CIS Controls v8.1 audits due to missing evidence? Get the blueprint: exact artifacts auditors want, repository structure, and automation from security tool
Real-World ISO 27701 Success: Synthesized Case Studies, Metrics, and Lessons for Privacy Resilience
Real-world ISO 27701 success from Tribeca, Kocho: DSAR efficiency gains, risk score reductions, certification ROI. Synthesized metrics prove privacy resilience
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 27001 vs NIST 800-171
Compare ISO 27001 vs NIST 800-171: Key differences in global ISMS standards vs US CUI protection. Choose the right framework for compliance, resilience & risk management now!
FISMA vs ISO 56002
FISMA vs ISO 56002: U.S. cybersecurity law meets global innovation framework. Compare compliance, RMF strategies, risks & benefits for resilient leadership. Unlock insights now!
OSHA vs FDA 21 CFR Part 11
Compare OSHA vs FDA 21 CFR Part 11: Workplace safety standards vs electronic records compliance. Expert insights to navigate rules, cut risks, boost efficiency. Achieve mastery today!