ISO 17025
International standard for competence of testing and calibration laboratories
ISO 22301
International standard for business continuity management systems
Quick Verdict
ISO 17025 ensures laboratory testing competence and impartiality for credible results, while ISO 22301 builds business continuity resilience against disruptions. Labs adopt 17025 for accreditation and market access; organizations use 22301 for risk mitigation and recovery.
ISO 17025
ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for testing and calibration laboratories
Key Features
- Mandates impartiality risk identification and mitigation
- Requires measurement uncertainty evaluation for results
- Ensures metrological traceability to SI units
- Manages personnel competence full lifecycle
- Enables ILAC-recognized accreditation for global acceptance
ISO 22301
ISO 22301:2019 Business continuity management systems — Requirements
Key Features
- PDCA cycle with Annex SL high-level structure
- Business Impact Analysis (BIA) and Risk Assessment
- Leadership commitment and BCMS policy requirements
- Operational testing and continuity exercises
- Integration with ISO 27001 for IMS
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 17025 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 17025:2017 is the international standard specifying general requirements for the competence, impartiality, and consistent operation of testing and calibration laboratories. It applies a risk-based, performance-oriented approach tying management controls to technical validity of results, covering testing, calibration, and sampling activities.
Key Components
- Eight core elements: general (impartiality/confidentiality), structural, resource, process, and management system requirements.
- Focuses on metrological traceability, measurement uncertainty, method validation, personnel competence, and proficiency testing.
- Built on risk-based thinking; offers Option A (standalone) or B (ISO 9001-aligned) management systems.
- Leads to accreditation by ILAC-recognized bodies, attesting technical competence within defined scopes.
Why Organizations Use It
- Ensures results acceptance by regulators, customers, and global markets.
- Mitigates risks of invalid data impacting safety, compliance, and trade.
- Provides competitive edge via credibility, efficiency, and market access.
- Builds stakeholder trust through demonstrated impartiality and traceability.
Implementation Overview
- Phased PDCA approach: gap analysis, documentation, technical validation, audits.
- Suited for labs of all sizes in regulated industries; requires metrology expertise, training, equipment calibration.
- Involves accreditation assessments with witnessed testing and surveillance.
ISO 22301 Details
What It Is
ISO 22301:2019 is the international standard specifying requirements for a Business Continuity Management System (BCMS). It enables organizations to protect against, respond to, and recover from disruptions like cyberattacks and natural disasters, employing a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) methodology aligned with Annex SL high-level structure.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10: context, leadership, planning (BIA/RA), support, operations, performance evaluation, improvement.
- Core: Business Impact Analysis (BIA), Risk Assessment (RA), continuity strategies, testing exercises.
- PDCA cycle for continual enhancement.
- Certification model: two-stage audits, 3-year validity with annual surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Minimizes downtime, financial losses, recovery times.
- Ensures regulatory compliance (e.g., NIS Directive), lowers insurance premiums.
- Builds stakeholder trust, competitive advantages, resilience culture.
- Synergizes with ISO 27001 for integrated management systems.
Implementation Overview
- Gap analysis, BIA/RA, policy development, training, testing, audits.
- Suits all organization sizes/sectors globally.
- Accelerated via platforms (e.g., 6 months); certification 6-8 weeks.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 17025 | ISO 22301 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Laboratory competence, testing/calibration validity | Business continuity management, disruption resilience |
| Industry | Testing labs, calibration across sectors globally | All organizations/sectors worldwide |
| Nature | Voluntary accreditation standard | Voluntary certification standard |
| Testing | Proficiency testing, witnessed activities, audits | Tabletop exercises, simulations, internal audits |
| Penalties | Loss of accreditation, market exclusion | Loss of certification, no legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 17025 and ISO 22301
ISO 17025 FAQ
ISO 22301 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
The 'Black Box' Risk: Why Human-in-the-Loop is the Ultimate Fail-Safe for 2026 Security Operations
Uncover the black box AI risk in security ops. Learn why human-in-the-loop auditing is crucial for 2026. Upskill analysts to ensure data privacy and robust secu
Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for
NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions
Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
NIS2 vs EN 1090
NIS2 vs EN 1090: Cyber directive expands scope, mandates risk mgmt & 2% fines vs steel/aluminium execution std w/EXC1-4, FPC & CE marking. Compare now!
IATF 16949 vs ISO 27018
Compare IATF 16949 vs ISO 27018: Automotive QMS power meets cloud PII privacy code. Uncover key diffs in clauses, risks, controls & audits. Boost compliance now!
ISO 27032 vs AS9120B
ISO 27032 vs AS9120B: Compare cybersecurity Internet guidelines with aerospace distributor QMS. Key differences in scope, risks, compliance & implementation. Boost resilience—explore now!