ISO 27032
International guidelines for Internet cybersecurity collaboration
AS9120B
IAQG standard for aerospace distributor quality management
Quick Verdict
ISO 27032 offers cybersecurity guidelines for internet ecosystems across industries, while AS9120B mandates certifiable QMS for aerospace distributors. Organizations adopt ISO 27032 for collaborative cyber resilience and AS9120B for supply chain approval and market access.
ISO 27032
ISO/IEC 27032:2023 Cybersecurity Guidelines for Internet Security
Key Features
- Multi-stakeholder collaboration in cyberspace ecosystem
- Bridges information, network, internet, CIIP domains
- Risk-driven guidelines for Internet security threats
- Annex maps to ISO 27002 controls
- Emphasizes detection, response, information sharing
AS9120B
AS9120B Quality Management Systems for Distributors
Key Features
- Counterfeit and suspected unapproved parts prevention
- Traceability and chain-of-custody controls for split lots
- Enhanced external provider evaluation and registers
- Configuration management for distribution processes
- Risk-based operational planning and performance evaluation
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 27032 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27032:2023 – Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security is an international guidance standard (informative, non-certifiable). It frames cybersecurity as an ecosystem activity, connecting information security, network security, Internet security, and CIIP. Primary purpose: collaborative risk management, incident response in cyberspace/Internet environments. Approach: risk-first, stakeholder-driven, complementing certifiable standards like ISO/IEC 27001.
Key Components
- Multi-stakeholder roles, collaboration frameworks
- Risk assessment, threat modeling, controls (preventive, detective, corrective)
- Domains: access control, incident management, awareness, vulnerability management
- **Annex Amaps Internet threats to ISO/IEC 27002 controls Built on PDCA cycle, trust/transparency principles; no fixed controls count.
Why Organizations Use It
Reduces legal/operational risks (e.g., GDPR/NIS2 alignment), enhances resilience, cuts costs via efficiency. Builds stakeholder trust, enables market access, competitive edge in regulated sectors. Manages supply-chain/third-party risks, shortens incident dwell time.
Implementation Overview
**Phasedsponsorship, gap analysis, risk assessment, controls deployment, monitoring. Key activities: stakeholder mapping, telemetry, exercises. Suits all sizes/industries with online ops, esp. critical infrastructure. No certification; integrate into ISMS, use audits for maturity.
AS9120B Details
What It Is
AS9120B is the IAQG quality management system (QMS) standard for organizations distributing aviation, space, and defense parts without altering characteristics. Built on ISO 9001:2015's 10-clause high-level structure, it employs a risk-based approach to address distributor-specific risks like traceability loss and counterfeits.
Key Components
- Over 100 aerospace additions: traceability, counterfeit prevention, external provider controls, configuration management.
- Pillars: context/leadership (4-5), planning/support (6-7), operation/evaluation/improvement (8-10).
- Certification model via accredited bodies, OASIS listing.
Why Organizations Use It
- Commercial prerequisite for OEM/Tier-1 supply chains.
- Mitigates risks (counterfeits, documentation errors), builds trust.
- Yields efficiency, market access (2,442 global certifications).
- Enhances reputation, reduces nonconformities.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-12 months).
- Targets distributors; scalable by size/geography.
- Involves internal audits, management review, Stage 1/2 certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 27032 | AS9120B |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Internet security guidelines in cyberspace ecosystem | Aerospace parts distribution quality management |
| Industry | All sectors with online/networked operations globally | Aerospace distributors, aviation/space/defense |
| Nature | Non-certifiable informative guidance standard | Certifiable QMS requirements standard |
| Testing | Gap analysis, internal risk assessments, exercises | Third-party certification audits, surveillance |
| Penalties | No direct penalties, market/reputational risks | Loss of certification, contract exclusion |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 27032 and AS9120B
ISO 27032 FAQ
AS9120B FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 10 SOC 2 Mistakes Startups Make (and Fixes with Automation)
Avoid top 10 SOC 2 mistakes like scope creep & evidence gaps. See fail/pass visuals, client quotes, Vanta/Drata automation fixes for bootstrapped startups. Quic

SOC 2 for Fintech Startups: First 5 Steps to Compliance with Confidentiality Criterion Infographic
First 5 steps to SOC 2 compliance with Confidentiality for fintech SaaS. Infographic maps controls to risks like encryption & TPRM. Integrates GLBA/PCI DSS over

CMMC Sustainment Mastery: Continuous Monitoring, Annual Affirmations, and Subcontractor Flow-Down Playbook
Master CMMC sustainment beyond certification: continuous monitoring dashboards, SPRS/eMASS affirmations, enforceable subcontractor clauses. Get templates for ve
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
IFS Food vs ISO 26000
IFS Food vs ISO 26000: Certifiable GFSI audits ensure food safety & process compliance; non-certifiable SR guidance covers governance, HES, ethics. Compare & optimize now!
IEC 62443 vs ISO 28000
Compare IEC 62443 vs ISO 28000: OT cybersecurity zones/SLs vs supply chain resilience. Key differences, benefits & implementation. Secure IACS now!
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs FedRAMP
Unlock ISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs FedRAMP: AI governance meets federal cloud security. Compare PDCA frameworks, risk controls & certification paths for compliant AI. Choose wisely!