Standards Comparison

    ISO 27032

    Voluntary
    2012

    International guidelines for Internet cybersecurity collaboration

    VS

    AS9120B

    Mandatory
    2016

    IAQG standard for aerospace distributor quality management

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 27032 offers cybersecurity guidelines for internet ecosystems across industries, while AS9120B mandates certifiable QMS for aerospace distributors. Organizations adopt ISO 27032 for collaborative cyber resilience and AS9120B for supply chain approval and market access.

    Cybersecurity

    ISO 27032

    ISO/IEC 27032:2023 Cybersecurity Guidelines for Internet Security

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Multi-stakeholder collaboration in cyberspace ecosystem
    • Bridges information, network, internet, CIIP domains
    • Risk-driven guidelines for Internet security threats
    • Annex maps to ISO 27002 controls
    • Emphasizes detection, response, information sharing
    Quality Management

    AS9120B

    AS9120B Quality Management Systems for Distributors

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Counterfeit and suspected unapproved parts prevention
    • Traceability and chain-of-custody controls for split lots
    • Enhanced external provider evaluation and registers
    • Configuration management for distribution processes
    • Risk-based operational planning and performance evaluation

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 27032 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 27032:2023 – Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security is an international guidance standard (informative, non-certifiable). It frames cybersecurity as an ecosystem activity, connecting information security, network security, Internet security, and CIIP. Primary purpose: collaborative risk management, incident response in cyberspace/Internet environments. Approach: risk-first, stakeholder-driven, complementing certifiable standards like ISO/IEC 27001.

    Key Components

    • Multi-stakeholder roles, collaboration frameworks
    • Risk assessment, threat modeling, controls (preventive, detective, corrective)
    • Domains: access control, incident management, awareness, vulnerability management
    • **Annex Amaps Internet threats to ISO/IEC 27002 controls Built on PDCA cycle, trust/transparency principles; no fixed controls count.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Reduces legal/operational risks (e.g., GDPR/NIS2 alignment), enhances resilience, cuts costs via efficiency. Builds stakeholder trust, enables market access, competitive edge in regulated sectors. Manages supply-chain/third-party risks, shortens incident dwell time.

    Implementation Overview

    **Phasedsponsorship, gap analysis, risk assessment, controls deployment, monitoring. Key activities: stakeholder mapping, telemetry, exercises. Suits all sizes/industries with online ops, esp. critical infrastructure. No certification; integrate into ISMS, use audits for maturity.

    AS9120B Details

    What It Is

    AS9120B is the IAQG quality management system (QMS) standard for organizations distributing aviation, space, and defense parts without altering characteristics. Built on ISO 9001:2015's 10-clause high-level structure, it employs a risk-based approach to address distributor-specific risks like traceability loss and counterfeits.

    Key Components

    • Over 100 aerospace additions: traceability, counterfeit prevention, external provider controls, configuration management.
    • Pillars: context/leadership (4-5), planning/support (6-7), operation/evaluation/improvement (8-10).
    • Certification model via accredited bodies, OASIS listing.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Commercial prerequisite for OEM/Tier-1 supply chains.
    • Mitigates risks (counterfeits, documentation errors), builds trust.
    • Yields efficiency, market access (2,442 global certifications).
    • Enhances reputation, reduces nonconformities.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-12 months).
    • Targets distributors; scalable by size/geography.
    • Involves internal audits, management review, Stage 1/2 certification.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO 27032
    Internet security guidelines in cyberspace ecosystem
    AS9120B
    Aerospace parts distribution quality management

    Industry

    ISO 27032
    All sectors with online/networked operations globally
    AS9120B
    Aerospace distributors, aviation/space/defense

    Nature

    ISO 27032
    Non-certifiable informative guidance standard
    AS9120B
    Certifiable QMS requirements standard

    Testing

    ISO 27032
    Gap analysis, internal risk assessments, exercises
    AS9120B
    Third-party certification audits, surveillance

    Penalties

    ISO 27032
    No direct penalties, market/reputational risks
    AS9120B
    Loss of certification, contract exclusion

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 27032 and AS9120B

    ISO 27032 FAQ

    AS9120B FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages