ISO 19600
International guidelines for compliance management systems
APRA CPS 234
Australian prudential standard for information security resilience
Quick Verdict
ISO 19600 offers voluntary CMS guidelines for all organizations globally, while APRA CPS 234 mandates enforceable information security for Australian financial entities. Companies adopt ISO 19600 for scalable compliance frameworks; CPS 234 ensures regulatory cyber resilience.
ISO 19600
ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems — Guidelines
Key Features
- Explicit governance principles for compliance independence
- Risk-based PDCA management system framework
- Scalable to any organization size and complexity
- Integrates with other ISO management systems
- Broad obligations including voluntary commitments
APRA CPS 234
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security
Key Features
- Board ultimate responsibility for information security
- 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents
- Controls commensurate with asset criticality and lifecycle
- Systematic independent testing of security controls
- Third-party capability assessment and assurance required
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 19600 Details
What It Is
ISO 19600:2014, titled Compliance management systems — Guidelines, is a non-certifiable international guideline from ISO. It provides scalable guidance for establishing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving a Compliance Management System (CMS). The primary scope covers all organization types and sizes, using a risk-based, principles-driven approach aligned with PDCA cycle and high-level structure.
Key Components
- Core pillars: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- **Four principlesgood governance, proportionality, transparency, sustainability.
- Governance focus: compliance function independence, direct board access, adequate resources.
- No fixed controls; emphasizes obligations identification, risk assessment, culture embedding.
- Guidance model, not requirements; predecessor to certifiable ISO 37301.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives risk mitigation, operational efficiency, and governance signaling to regulators/courts. Builds stakeholder trust, integrates with other systems, supports penalty reductions. Strategic for demonstrating proactive compliance amid regulatory complexity.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, policy/objectives, controls/training, monitoring/audits. Applicable universally; proportionate to size/complexity. No certification; internal benchmarking via audits/management reviews. (178 words)
APRA CPS 234 Details
What It Is
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding prudential regulation for APRA-regulated financial institutions in Australia. Effective from 1 July 2019, it requires entities to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with vulnerabilities and threats, minimizing impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of information assets, including those managed by third parties. It adopts a risk-based, assurance-driven approach with board accountability.
Key Components
- **GovernanceBoard ultimate responsibility; defined roles and policy framework.
- **Risk ManagementAsset classification by criticality and sensitivity.
- **ControlsLifecycle implementation commensurate with risks.
- **Incident ManagementDetection/response mechanisms; annual response plan testing.
- **Testing/AssuranceSystematic, independent control testing; internal audit reviews.
- **Reporting72-hour notification for material incidents; 10-day for control weaknesses. No fixed control count; principles-based, aligns with ISO 27001/NIST. Compliance via evidence and supervision.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for ADIs, insurers, super funds to avoid penalties, enforcement.
- Enhances cyber resilience, operational continuity, stakeholder protection.
- Builds trust, reduces incident risks, supports prudential outcomes.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, asset inventory, controls, testing, third-party assessments. Applies to all regulated entity sizes in Australia; board oversight, internal audit essential; no certification but APRA scrutiny.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 19600 | APRA CPS 234 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Compliance management systems guidelines | Information security and cyber resilience |
| Industry | All organizations worldwide, scalable | Australian financial services only |
| Nature | Voluntary guidelines, non-certifiable | Mandatory prudential standard, enforceable |
| Testing | Audits, management reviews recommended | Systematic independent testing required |
| Penalties | No legal penalties | Regulatory sanctions, enforcement actions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 19600 and APRA CPS 234
ISO 19600 FAQ
APRA CPS 234 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 5 Reasons Automation Tools Like Vanta Slash SOC 2 Type 2 Timelines from Months to Weeks
Automation tools like Vanta cut SOC 2 Type 2 prep from 6 months to 6 weeks, saving 70% costs. See SignWell examples, AWS/Okta/GitHub integrations. CISOs: Get fi

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense
Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy

From SOC to AI-Native CDC: Redefining Triage and Response in 2026
Explore the shift from SOCs to AI-Native CDCs. Autonomous agents handle Tier 1 triage in 2026, empowering analysts for complex threats. Discover the future of c
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PDPA vs SAMA CSF
PDPA vs SAMA CSF: Contrast Asia's privacy acts (Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan PDPA) with Saudi finance cybersecurity framework. Key insights for global compliance pros. Dive in!
GLBA vs ISO 56002
GLBA vs ISO 56002: Compare strict U.S. financial privacy/safeguards rules with global innovation management guidance. Key diffs, compliance tips & strategy—explore now!
ISO 22000 vs ISO 27018
Discover ISO 22000 vs ISO 27018: Food safety FSMS (HLS, PDCA, HACCP) vs cloud PII privacy controls. Compare scopes, benefits & compliance. Choose wisely now!