Standards Comparison

    ISO 19600

    Voluntary
    2014

    International guidelines for compliance management systems

    VS

    Australian Privacy Act

    Mandatory
    1988

    Australian federal law regulating personal information handling

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 19600 offers voluntary CMS guidelines for global compliance risks, while Australian Privacy Act mandates APPs for personal data handling in Australia with hefty fines. Organizations adopt ISO 19600 for benchmarking; Privacy Act for legal compliance.

    Compliance Management

    ISO 19600

    ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems — Guidelines

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Explicit governance principles for compliance independence
    • Risk-based PDCA management system cycle
    • Proportionality scales to organization size complexity
    • Broad obligations include voluntary commitments codes
    • High-level structure integrates other ISO systems
    Data Privacy

    Australian Privacy Act

    Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • 13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) for data lifecycle
    • Notifiable Data Breaches scheme mandating serious harm notifications
    • APP 8 accountability for cross-border disclosures
    • APP 11 reasonable steps for security and retention
    • OAIC enforcement with multimillion civil penalties

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 19600 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 19600:2014 — Compliance management systems — Guidelines is an international standard providing non-certifiable guidance for establishing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving a Compliance Management System (CMS). It uses a risk-based, principles-driven approach applicable to all organization types, emphasizing proportionality to size, structure, and complexity.

    Key Components

    • Core clauses follow high-level structure and **PDCA cyclecontext, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
    • **Governance principlescompliance function independence, direct board access, adequate resources.
    • Identifies broad compliance obligations (legal, voluntary, contractual) and risks.
    • No fixed controls; guidance-based, integrates with ISO systems like 9001, 14001.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mitigates regulatory risks, fines, reputational damage.
    • Enhances governance, culture, operational efficiency.
    • Builds stakeholder trust; benchmark for regulators/courts.
    • Strategic enabler despite withdrawal (replaced by certifiable ISO 37301).

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, policy/objectives, controls/training, monitoring/audits.
    • Scalable for SMEs (6-12 months) to enterprises (12-36 months).
    • Universal applicability; no certification, focuses on internal alignment.

    Australian Privacy Act Details

    What It Is

    The Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) is Australia's primary federal privacy regulation, establishing baseline standards for handling personal information by government agencies and private sector organizations. It adopts a principles-based approach via the 13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs), covering the full data lifecycle with risk-calibrated "reasonable steps" requirements.

    Key Components

    • **13 APPsGovernance (APP 1), collection/notice (APPs 3-5), use/disclosure (APPs 6-8), integrity/security (APPs 10-11), rights (APPs 12-13).
    • Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) scheme for serious harm incidents.
    • OAIC oversight with civil penalties up to AUD 50M or 30% turnover. No formal certification; compliance via self-assessment, audits, enforcement.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for entities >$3M turnover, health providers, etc.
    • Mitigates breach risks, penalties, reputational harm.
    • Builds trust, enables data flows, supports cyber resilience.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, policy design, controls deployment, NDB readiness. Applies economy-wide in Australia; scales by size/sensitivity. OAIC guidance aids, no mandatory audit.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO 19600
    CMS guidelines for all obligations and risks
    Australian Privacy Act
    Personal information handling principles (APPs)

    Industry

    ISO 19600
    All organizations worldwide, scalable
    Australian Privacy Act
    Australian entities >$3M turnover, health etc.

    Nature

    ISO 19600
    Voluntary guidelines, non-certifiable, withdrawn
    Australian Privacy Act
    Mandatory law with civil penalties, enforceable

    Testing

    ISO 19600
    Internal audits, management reviews recommended
    Australian Privacy Act
    OAIC assessments, incident notifications required

    Penalties

    ISO 19600
    No legal penalties, internal consequences only
    Australian Privacy Act
    Up to AUD 50M fines or 30% turnover

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 19600 and Australian Privacy Act

    ISO 19600 FAQ

    Australian Privacy Act FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages