ISO 19600
International guidelines for compliance management systems
Australian Privacy Act
Australian federal law regulating personal information handling
Quick Verdict
ISO 19600 offers voluntary CMS guidelines for global compliance risks, while Australian Privacy Act mandates APPs for personal data handling in Australia with hefty fines. Organizations adopt ISO 19600 for benchmarking; Privacy Act for legal compliance.
ISO 19600
ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems — Guidelines
Key Features
- Explicit governance principles for compliance independence
- Risk-based PDCA management system cycle
- Proportionality scales to organization size complexity
- Broad obligations include voluntary commitments codes
- High-level structure integrates other ISO systems
Australian Privacy Act
Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)
Key Features
- 13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) for data lifecycle
- Notifiable Data Breaches scheme mandating serious harm notifications
- APP 8 accountability for cross-border disclosures
- APP 11 reasonable steps for security and retention
- OAIC enforcement with multimillion civil penalties
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 19600 Details
What It Is
ISO 19600:2014 — Compliance management systems — Guidelines is an international standard providing non-certifiable guidance for establishing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving a Compliance Management System (CMS). It uses a risk-based, principles-driven approach applicable to all organization types, emphasizing proportionality to size, structure, and complexity.
Key Components
- Core clauses follow high-level structure and **PDCA cyclecontext, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- **Governance principlescompliance function independence, direct board access, adequate resources.
- Identifies broad compliance obligations (legal, voluntary, contractual) and risks.
- No fixed controls; guidance-based, integrates with ISO systems like 9001, 14001.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates regulatory risks, fines, reputational damage.
- Enhances governance, culture, operational efficiency.
- Builds stakeholder trust; benchmark for regulators/courts.
- Strategic enabler despite withdrawal (replaced by certifiable ISO 37301).
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, policy/objectives, controls/training, monitoring/audits.
- Scalable for SMEs (6-12 months) to enterprises (12-36 months).
- Universal applicability; no certification, focuses on internal alignment.
Australian Privacy Act Details
What It Is
The Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) is Australia's primary federal privacy regulation, establishing baseline standards for handling personal information by government agencies and private sector organizations. It adopts a principles-based approach via the 13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs), covering the full data lifecycle with risk-calibrated "reasonable steps" requirements.
Key Components
- **13 APPsGovernance (APP 1), collection/notice (APPs 3-5), use/disclosure (APPs 6-8), integrity/security (APPs 10-11), rights (APPs 12-13).
- Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) scheme for serious harm incidents.
- OAIC oversight with civil penalties up to AUD 50M or 30% turnover. No formal certification; compliance via self-assessment, audits, enforcement.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for entities >$3M turnover, health providers, etc.
- Mitigates breach risks, penalties, reputational harm.
- Builds trust, enables data flows, supports cyber resilience.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, policy design, controls deployment, NDB readiness. Applies economy-wide in Australia; scales by size/sensitivity. OAIC guidance aids, no mandatory audit.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 19600 | Australian Privacy Act |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | CMS guidelines for all obligations and risks | Personal information handling principles (APPs) |
| Industry | All organizations worldwide, scalable | Australian entities >$3M turnover, health etc. |
| Nature | Voluntary guidelines, non-certifiable, withdrawn | Mandatory law with civil penalties, enforceable |
| Testing | Internal audits, management reviews recommended | OAIC assessments, incident notifications required |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, internal consequences only | Up to AUD 50M fines or 30% turnover |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 19600 and Australian Privacy Act
ISO 19600 FAQ
Australian Privacy Act FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance
Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance

Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages
Uncover top 5 unseen complexities modern compliance software manages effortlessly—from sensitive data mapping to real-time regulatory shifts. Automate audits, i
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
BREEAM vs ISO 22000
Compare BREEAM vs ISO 22000: BREEAM certifies sustainable buildings (energy, health, ecology); ISO 22000 ensures food safety (HACCP, PRPs). Key differences & benefits—choose wisely now!
COPPA vs FDA 21 CFR Part 11
Compare COPPA vs FDA 21 CFR Part 11: Decode child privacy (FTC) vs electronic records rules. Master compliance, dodge fines up to $170M, ensure data trust. Dive in now!
C-TPAT vs APRA CPS 234
Compare C-TPAT vs APRA CPS 234: U.S. supply chain security vs Australia's financial info security standard. Key differences, compliance tips & benefits for resilient ops. Dive in now.