ISO 19600
Guidelines for compliance management systems
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
International standard for artificial intelligence management systems.
Quick Verdict
ISO 19600 offers guidelines for general compliance systems, now withdrawn for ISO 37301, while ISO/IEC 42001:2023 provides certifiable AI management requirements. Companies adopt ISO 19600 concepts for foundational CMS and ISO/IEC 42001 for ethical AI governance and certification.
ISO 19600
ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems — Guidelines
Key Features
- Risk-based approach to compliance prioritization
- Flexible guidelines scalable for all organizations
- PDCA continual improvement management model
- Strong emphasis on leadership governance principles
- Integration with existing management systems
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Management Systems
Key Features
- PDCA-based framework with HLS for MSS integration
- Mandatory AI Impact Assessments for high-risk systems
- Annex A: 38 AI-specific controls for lifecycle risks
- Third-party risk management and supply chain controls
- Continuous monitoring and model drift metrics
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 19600 Details
What It Is
ISO 19600:2014 provides guidelines for establishing, implementing, and improving Compliance Management Systems (CMS). It offers a risk-based, flexible approach applicable to all organizations, emphasizing proportionality, good governance, transparency, and sustainability. Superseded by ISO 37301:2021, it uses a PDCA cycle aligned with Annex SL structure.
Key Components
- Core clauses: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- Principles: governance, independence of compliance function, risk assessment per ISO 31000.
- No fixed controls; scalable guidance, non-certifiable.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates regulatory fines, operational disruptions, reputation risks.
- Enables strategic decision-making, efficiency, market access.
- Builds trust, integrates with QMS/ERM; voluntary adoption for best practices.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, design, deploy, monitor, improve.
- Scalable for SMEs (6-12 months) to MNCs (12-36 months).
- All sizes/sectors; no certification, focuses on internal benchmarking.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is the world's first international standard for Artificial Intelligence Management Systems (AIMS), specifying requirements to establish, implement, maintain, and improve responsible AI governance. Applicable to any organization—developers, providers, users—it uses a risk-based Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) methodology and High-Level Structure (HLS) to manage AI lifecycle risks like bias, transparency, and ethics.
Key Components
Core elements span Clauses 4-10: context analysis, leadership commitment, risk planning with AI Impact Assessments (AIIAs), support resources, operational controls, performance evaluation, and improvement. Annex A provides 38 AI-specific controls across 10 themes (e.g., data governance, transparency). Built on HLS, it integrates with ISO 9001/27001. Certification involves third-party audits for credibility.
Why Organizations Use It
Adoption drives risk mitigation, regulatory alignment (e.g., EU AI Act), and opportunities like innovation/trust. Early adopters (Microsoft, UiPath) gain competitive differentiation, reputation enhancement, supply chain resilience, and SDG alignment via ethical AI practices.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, AIIAs, training, audits. Typical 6-12 months (faster with existing MSS). Universal for all sizes/sectors; certification via accredited bodies like BSI/Schellman, with 3-year validity and surveillance.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 19600 | ISO/IEC 42001:2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Compliance management systems guidelines | AI management systems across lifecycle |
| Industry | All sectors, organizations worldwide | All sectors using/developing AI globally |
| Nature | Withdrawn guidelines, non-certifiable | Certifiable requirements standard |
| Testing | Internal audits, management reviews | Third-party certification audits |
| Penalties | No formal penalties | Loss of certification |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 19600 and ISO/IEC 42001:2023
ISO 19600 FAQ
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates
Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt
The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance
Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac
From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day
Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
NIST CSF vs POPIA
Discover NIST CSF vs POPIA: Compare cybersecurity framework with SA privacy law. Align Govern function, risk mgmt & safeguards. Boost compliance—read now!
GDPR vs APRA CPS 234
Compare GDPR vs APRA CPS 234: EU privacy law meets Aussie financial cyber resilience. Key diffs in scope, fines, enforcement—master compliance for global ops. Unlock insights now!
GDPR vs SQF
Compare GDPR vs SQF: EU data privacy law meets GFSI food safety standard. Uncover key differences, compliance tips & strategies for seamless regulatory mastery. Dive in now!