What is the primary objective of **GDPR**?

**The primary objective of **GDPR** is to protect the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons, particularly their right to the protection of personal data, while ensuring the free movement of personal data within the EU.** Enacted as Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and enforceable since May 25, 2018, it replaces the 1995 Data Protection Directive to address digital-age challenges like big data and cross-border flows. Core principles in Article 5 include lawfulness, fairness, transparency, purpose limitation, data minimisation, accuracy, storage limitation, integrity/confidentiality, and accountability.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **GDPR**?

**All **data controllers** and **data processors** that process **personal data** of individuals in the EU/EEA must comply with **GDPR**, regardless of location.** Article 3 establishes extraterritorial scope: it applies to EU-established entities and non-EU entities offering goods/services to or monitoring EU data subjects. **Personal data** covers any identifiable information (e.g., names, IP addresses, genetic data). Mandatory **Data Protection Officers (DPOs)** are required for public authorities or large-scale systematic monitoring/special-category processing (Article 37).

Does **GDPR** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, **GDPR** does not mandate external audits or third-party certification for compliance.** Article 42 encourages voluntary certification mechanisms, seals, or marks by accredited bodies to demonstrate compliance, but these are optional. Organizations must self-demonstrate adherence via **Records of Processing Activities (ROPA)** (Article 30), **Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs)** for high-risk processing (Article 35), and accountability measures, subject to supervisory authority oversight.

How often should an assessment for **GDPR** be performed?

****GDPR** requires ongoing, risk-based assessments rather than fixed intervals, with **DPIAs** conducted prior to high-risk processing and reviewed if risks change.** Article 35 mandates DPIAs for systematic monitoring, large-scale special-category data, or high-risk activities. **Security of processing** (Article 32) demands continuous evaluation of state-of-the-art measures. **Breach** assessments trigger 72-hour notifications (Articles 33-34). Annual reviews or post-incident reassessments align with accountability (Article 5(2)).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **GDPR**?

**Non-compliance with **GDPR** incurs administrative fines up to €20 million or 4% of global annual turnover (whichever is higher) for severe violations, or up to €10 million or 2% for lesser ones.** Article 83 tiers penalties: Tier 1 (e.g., basic obligations) at 2%; Tier 2 (e.g., data subjects' rights, controllers/processors) at 4%. Supervisory authorities enforce via the **one-stop-shop** (Article 56); additional remedies include data subject compensation (Article 82) and injunctions.

Can **GDPR** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, **GDPR** principles such as accountability, data minimisation, and lawful processing can be mapped to other international frameworks like Brazil's LGPD, California's CCPA/CPRA, and Japan's APPI.** Its global influence stems from extraterritorial reach and adequacy decisions (Article 45), enabling data transfers to equivalent regimes. Core alignments include consent, purpose limitation, and breach notification, though differences exist in opt-in/out models and penalties.

What is the first step to begin implementing **GDPR**?

**The first step to implement **GDPR** is conducting a comprehensive data mapping exercise to identify all **personal data** processing activities, legal bases, and risks.** This informs **ROPA** creation (Article 30), determines DPIA needs (Article 35), and DPO appointment (Article 37). Embed **privacy by design/default** (Article 25) from the outset to ensure lawfulness (Article 6) and accountability (Article 5(2)).

What is the primary objective of **SQF**?

**The primary objective of SQF is to provide a rigorous, HACCP-based food safety management system that assures consistent production of safe food products across the supply chain.** Administered by the SQF Institute (SQFI), it integrates **Module 2** (universal system elements like management commitment, HACCP plans, verification, and traceability) with sector-specific Good Practices modules (e.g., **Module 11** for food manufacturing GMPs), enabling GFSI-recognized certification for over 14,000 sites in 40+ countries.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SQF**?

**SQF compliance is voluntary but professionally required for suppliers to major retailers, brand owners, and foodservice providers as a de facto market access condition.** It applies to food manufacturers, primary producers, storage/distribution, packaging, pet food, and supplements via Food Sector Categories (FSCs); sites must designate a full-time, on-site **SQF Practitioner** with HACCP training and pair **Module 2** with applicable GMP modules for certification.

Does **SQF** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SQF mandates external audits by SQFI-licensed Certification Bodies (CBs) accredited to ISO/IEC 17065 for certification.** Annual certification audits (initial, surveillance, recertification) include on-site verification of documentation, implementation, and records; unannounced audits occur periodically (e.g., every 3 years), with nonconformities graded (minor=1pt, major=5pts, critical=50pts) against score bands (E:96-100, pass ≥70).

How often should an assessment for **SQF** be performed?

**SQF requires annual external certification audits with internal audits conducted regularly to maintain the system.** **Management reviews** occur at least annually (with monthly **SQF Practitioner** updates); internal audits (2.5.5) cover all elements ongoingly, while validation/verification (2.5.1-2.5.2), traceability exercises, and crisis/recall tests are performed annually or per risk.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SQF**?

**Non-compliance with SQF results in audit failure, certification denial/suspension, and commercial exclusion from GFSI-recognized supply chains.** Critical nonconformities (e.g., uncontrolled hazards) trigger immediate suspension; majors/minors require CAPA closure (often ≤30 days); repeated failures lead to lost retailer contracts, duplicative audits, recall risks, and heightened regulatory scrutiny.

Can **SQF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SQF maps to other GFSI-benchmarked frameworks through shared HACCP principles, management systems, and preventive controls.** Its **Module 2** elements (e.g., document control, CAPA, internal audits) align with common structures, enabling layering (e.g., SQF Quality Code atop Food Safety) while maintaining standalone certification via SQFI governance.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SQF**?

**The first step to implement SQF is site registration in the SQFI assessment database and designation of a competent **SQF Practitioner**. ** (74 words)**

GDPR vs SQF | GRADUM

Standards Comparison

GDPR

Mandatory

2016

EU regulation for personal data protection and privacy

SQF

Voluntary

2023

GFSI-benchmarked certification for food safety management

Quick Verdict

GDPR mandates data privacy for all handling EU personal data globally, with hefty fines. SQF certifies voluntary food safety systems for supply chains. Companies adopt GDPR for legal compliance, SQF for market access and buyer trust.

Data Privacy

GDPR

Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Applies extraterritorially to non-EU entities targeting EU residents
Mandates accountability principle with demonstrable compliance measures
Imposes fines up to 4% of global annual turnover
Grants data subject rights including erasure and portability
Requires 72-hour personal data breach notifications

Agile Scaling

SQF

Safe Quality Food (SQF) Food Safety Code

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Modular architecture: Module 2 plus sector GMPs
HACCP-based Food Safety Plan mandatory
GFSI-benchmarked for global retailer acceptance
Full-time onsite SQF Practitioner required
Annual audits with unannounced checks

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

GDPR Details

What It Is

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), or Regulation (EU) 2016/679, is a binding EU regulation replacing the 1995 Directive. It safeguards individuals' personal data rights while enabling free data flows in the Digital Single Market. Adopts a principles-based, accountability-driven, risk-focused approach.

Key Components

Seven core principles: lawfulness/fairness/transparency, purpose limitation, data minimization, accuracy, storage limitation, integrity/confidentiality, accountability.
Enhanced data subject rights: access, rectification, erasure ("right to be forgotten"), portability, objection.
Obligations include DPO appointment, DPIAs for high-risk processing, 72-hour breach notifications, Records of Processing Activities (ROPA).
Enforced by supervisory authorities via one-stop-shop, fines up to €20M or 4% global turnover.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for any processing EU residents' data, avoiding severe penalties. Reduces compliance fragmentation, builds customer trust, supports global operations. Sets "gold standard" influencing worldwide laws like LGPD, CCPA; enhances reputation and risk management.

Implementation Overview

Requires policy redesign, training, tech upgrades, DPIAs. Applies to all sizes processing EU data, globally. No formal certification but ongoing DPA audits, breach reporting. SMEs face high burdens; large firms need 18-24 months for full rollout.

SQF Details

What It Is

The Safe Quality Food (SQF) program is a GFSI-benchmarked certification and HACCP-based management system standard administered by SQFI. It ensures food safety and quality across supply chains—from farm to retail—using a modular, risk-based approach grounded in Codex HACCP principles.

Key Components

**Module 2Universal system elements including management commitment, document control, HACCP Food Safety Plan, verification, traceability, food defense, allergens, training.
Sector modules (e.g., Module 11 for GMPs in manufacturing).
Built on "say what you do, do what you say, prove it" triad.
Annual audits with scoring (E/G/C/F), nonconformities graded minor/major/critical.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets retailer mandates, aligns with FSMA/EU regs for due diligence.
Reduces recalls, audit duplication, enhances market access.
Strengthens supplier approval, food safety culture, resilience.

Implementation Overview

Phased PDCA: gap analysis, appoint SQF Practitioner, document/implement PRPs/HACCP, train, internal audits, certification audit by accredited CBs. Suits all sizes/industries; ongoing surveillance required. (178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	GDPR	SQF
Scope	Personal data privacy and protection	Food safety and quality management
Industry	All sectors worldwide targeting EU	Food supply chain sectors globally
Nature	Mandatory EU regulation with fines	Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification
Testing	DPIAs, audits by national DPAs	Annual third-party audits, unannounced
Penalties	Up to 4% global turnover fines	Loss of certification, no legal fines

Scope

GDPR

Personal data privacy and protection

SQF

Food safety and quality management

Industry

GDPR

All sectors worldwide targeting EU

SQF

Food supply chain sectors globally

Nature

GDPR

Mandatory EU regulation with fines

SQF

Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification

Testing

GDPR

DPIAs, audits by national DPAs

SQF

Annual third-party audits, unannounced

Penalties

GDPR

Up to 4% global turnover fines

SQF

Loss of certification, no legal fines

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about GDPR and SQF

GDPR FAQ

SQF FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation

Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc

Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses

Discover how compliance monitoring tools empower lean teams to automate real-time checks, ensure GDPR/HIPAA/SOC 2 compliance, and scale oversight efficiently. T

DORA Third-Party Risk Management: A Consultant’s Guide to Mapping Critical ICT Service Providers in 2026

Navigate DORA's complex third-party risk pillar. Step-by-step consultant guide to identify critical ICT providers, remediate Article 30 contracts, and build the

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 9001 vs Australian Privacy Act

ISO 9001 vs Australian Privacy Act: Compare quality management excellence with data protection rules. Unlock compliance strategies, efficiency gains & trust now!

ISO 37001 vs WELL

Compare ISO 37001 vs WELL: Anti-bribery governance meets health-focused buildings. Discover synergies for ethical, resilient organizations. Elevate compliance & wellness now!

NIST 800-53 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Compare NIST 800-53 vs MLPS 2.0: US federal controls meet China's graded protection. Uncover compliance gaps, strategies & global insights for secure ops. Dive in now!

GDPR

SQF

Quick Verdict

GDPR

Key Features

SQF

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

GDPR Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

SQF Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

GDPR FAQ

What is the primary objective of GDPR?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with GDPR?

Does GDPR require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for GDPR be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with GDPR?

Can GDPR be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing GDPR?

SQF FAQ

What is the primary objective of SQF?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SQF?

Does SQF require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SQF be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SQF?

Can SQF be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SQF?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation

Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses

DORA Third-Party Risk Management: A Consultant’s Guide to Mapping Critical ICT Service Providers in 2026

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 9001 vs Australian Privacy Act

ISO 37001 vs WELL

NIST 800-53 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)