ISO 20000
International standard for service management systems
ISO 28000
International standard for supply chain security management systems
Quick Verdict
ISO 20000 certifies service management for reliable IT/business delivery, while ISO 28000 establishes security management systems for supply chain resilience. Organizations adopt them for operational excellence, risk reduction, customer trust, and market differentiation through auditable governance.
ISO 20000
ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 Service management system requirements
ISO 28000
ISO 28000:2022 Security management systems requirements
Key Features
- Risk-based supply chain security assessment and treatment
- PDCA cycle for continual SMS improvement
- Top management leadership and commitment requirements
- Controls for external providers and processes
- Integrated audits and performance evaluation
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 20000 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 is the international certification standard for establishing, implementing, and improving a Service Management System (SMS). It specifies auditable requirements for managing service lifecycles—planning, design, transition, delivery, and improvement—using a risk-based, PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach aligned with Annex SL High-Level Structure.
Key Components
- Clauses 4–10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- Clause 8 details lifecycle domains: service portfolio, relationships, supply/demand, design/transition, resolution, assurance.
- Core processes include incident/problem management, change/release, configuration/asset, supplier control.
- Certifiable via accredited bodies with Stage 1/2 audits, surveillance, recertification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Drives service reliability, customer trust, risk reduction (69% report lower risks).
- Enables market differentiation, procurement wins; voluntary but demanded in tenders.
- Integrates with ISO 9001, ISO 27001; supports ITIL, DevOps.
- Benefits: 50% certificate growth, improved SLAs, operational efficiency.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, design, deploy, audit (12-18 months typical).
- Applies to all sizes/industries delivering services (IT, cloud, BPO).
- Requires leadership commitment, training, tools, evidence for certification.
ISO 28000 Details
What It Is
ISO 28000:2022 — Security and resilience — Security management systems — Requirements — is an international standard for establishing, implementing, and improving a security management system (SMS) with a focus on supply chain security. It uses a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) methodology aligned with modern ISO standards.
Key Components
- Clauses 4–10: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement
- Risk assessment/treatment per ISO 31000; security plans and controls
- Supplier interdependencies, competence, audits
- Optional certification via ISO 28003-accredited bodies
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates theft, sabotage, disruptions; ensures compliance
- Enables market access, partner requirements, insurance savings
- Boosts resilience, integrates with ISO 22301/27001
- Builds executive governance and stakeholder credibility
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, risk mapping, controls, training, audits
- Scalable for all sizes/sectors; supply chain-focused
- Involves documentation, management reviews, continual improvement
- Certification: Stage 1/2 audits, surveillance (typical 12-18 months)
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 20000 | ISO 28000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Service management systems (SMS) for IT and business services lifecycle | Security management systems (SMS) for supply chain security and resilience |
| Industry | All service providers, IT, cloud, facilities, any size globally | Logistics, manufacturing, retail, ports, any size globally |
| Nature | Voluntary certifiable management system standard | Voluntary certifiable management system standard |
| Testing | Internal audits, management reviews, Stage 1/2 certification audits | Internal audits, management reviews, Stage 1/2 certification audits |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 20000 and ISO 28000
ISO 20000 FAQ
ISO 28000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Practical Implementation Blueprint for Regulation S-K Item 106: Cybersecurity Governance and Risk Management Disclosures in 10-Ks
Step-by-step guide for Item 106 cybersecurity disclosures in 10-Ks: risk management, board oversight, Inline XBRL templates (Dec 2024 compliance). Templates for

NIST 800-53 Private Sector ROI Reality Check: Isolating Control Family Impacts on 2024 Breach Costs
Discover NIST 800-53 ROI in private sector: control families like RA, SI, SR reduce median breach costs from $100K to under $50K. Get benchmarks to prioritize i

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense
Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
SOX vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
Discover SOX vs MLPS 2.0: US financial controls meet China's cybersecurity grades. Key differences, strategies & compliance tips for global success. Dive in now!
ISO 45001 vs EU AI Act
ISO 45001 vs EU AI Act: Compare OH&S risk management, leadership & compliance. Unlock strategies for seamless integration, preventing hazards in AI-driven workplaces. Read now!
BRC vs SAMA CSF
Discover BRC vs SAMA CSF: Compare food safety certification with Saudi financial cybersecurity framework. Gain insights on structure, maturity models, implementation for compliance mastery. Elevate your strategy now!