What is the primary objective of **ISO 22000**?

**ISO 22000 enables organizations to consistently provide safe products through a Food Safety Management System (FSMS) that prevents, eliminates, or reduces food safety hazards to acceptable levels.** It integrates **Codex HACCP principles**, **PRPs**, **OPRPs**, and **CCPs** with management system requirements across Clauses 4–10, using two nested **PDCA cycles** for organizational governance and operational hazard control. The standard ensures compliance with statutory, regulatory, and customer requirements via effective **interactive communication** across the food chain.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 22000**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 22000, as it is a voluntary international standard.** It applies professionally to any entity in the food chain—**directly or indirectly**—including primary producers, feed/animal food producers, processors, packaging manufacturers, transport/storage providers, retailers, food services, and related suppliers, regardless of size. Certification demonstrates FSMS assurance for market access, supplier qualification, and customer/regulatory confidence.

Does **ISO 22000** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 22000 requires internal audits but not mandatory third-party certification.** Certification is voluntary, conducted by accredited bodies via **Stage 1** (readiness review) and **Stage 2** (implementation verification) audits, followed by annual surveillance and triennial recertification. Internal audits (Clause 9.2) must be risk-based to verify FSMS conformity and effectiveness.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 22000** be performed?

**ISO 22000 requires internal audits at planned intervals, with management reviews at least annually.** Assessments include risk-based **internal audits** (Clause 9.2) targeting high-risk processes more frequently, **verification** of PRPs/CCPs/OPRPs (Clause 8), and **management reviews** (Clause 9.3) evaluating performance data, audits, and context changes. For certified organizations, external surveillance audits occur annually, with recertification every three years.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 22000**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 22000 results in loss of certification, but carries no direct ISO-imposed penalties.** Organizational consequences include food safety incidents leading to recalls, regulatory fines under local laws, litigation, brand damage, market exclusion, and supply chain disruptions. Certification bodies may suspend or withdraw certificates for major nonconformities not corrected within specified timeframes.

Can **ISO 22000** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 22000:2018 follows the High-Level Structure (HLS) enabling seamless mapping to other ISO management system standards.** Its **Annex SL** alignment with ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and ISO 45001 supports integrated systems, shared audits, and common processes like risk-based planning, leadership, and PDCA. It forms the foundation for GFSI schemes like FSSC 22000, incorporating all ISO 22000 requirements plus sector-specific PRPs.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 22000**?

**The first step is defining the FSMS scope and understanding organizational context (Clause 4).** Identify internal/external issues, interested parties' requirements, and FSMS boundaries, followed by a gap analysis against Clauses 4–10. Assemble a cross-functional food safety team to conduct hazard analysis prerequisites like PRPs and process flow diagrams.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 19600**?

**ISO 19600 provides guidelines for establishing, developing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving an effective Compliance Management System (CMS).** Published in 2014 as a Type B guidance standard, it follows a high-level Annex SL structure with 10 clauses covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, and improvement. Core principles include good governance, proportionality, transparency, and sustainability, enabling risk-based integration with existing processes for all organization sizes.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 19600**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 19600, as it is non-mandatory Type B guidance applicable to all types and sizes of organizations.** It targets entities facing statutory, regulatory, contractual, or internal policy obligations, including financial services, manufacturing, healthcare, technology, public sector, SMEs, and startups. Stakeholders like CCOs, boards, and risk officers use it for benchmarking CMS effectiveness to regulators and partners.

Does **ISO 19600** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, ISO 19600 does not require external audits or third-party certification, as it provides recommendations rather than mandatory requirements.** Organizations conduct internal audits per Clause 9.2 (aligned with ISO 19011) and self-assessments. It supports voluntary benchmarking to demonstrate CMS alignment, unlike certifiable Type A standards.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 19600** be performed?

**ISO 19600 assessments should be performed at planned intervals via internal audits, monitoring, and management reviews, with reassessments triggered by changes in context, obligations, or risks.** Clause 9 requires continual monitoring of performance (KCIs), periodic audits (Clause 9.2), and management reviews (Clause 9.3) considering audits, nonconformities, and regulatory updates—typically quarterly for reviews and annually for full audits, scaled by risk.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 19600**?

**There are no direct consequences for non-compliance with ISO 19600 itself, as it imposes no legal penalties.** However, lacking a structured CMS increases exposure to regulatory fines, operational disruptions, reputational damage, higher insurance costs, and governance failures from unaddressed compliance obligations and risks.

Can **ISO 19600** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 19600 can be mapped to other international frameworks due to its Annex SL structure and PDCA cycle.** Its 10 clauses align with high-level structures in management system standards, enabling integration with enterprise risk, quality, environmental, and health/safety processes while preserving compliance independence.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 19600**?

**The first step is securing leadership commitment and establishing governance, including a board resolution and Compliance Steering Committee (Clause 5).** Define CMS scope (Clause 4.3), understand organizational context and obligations (Clauses 4.1–4.2), and appoint a compliance function with direct governing body access, independence, and resources (Clause 4.4).

ISO 22000 vs ISO 19600

Standards Comparison

ISO 22000

Voluntary

2018

International standard for food safety management systems

ISO 19600

Voluntary

2014

International guidelines for compliance management systems.

Quick Verdict

ISO 22000 provides certifiable food safety management for food chain organizations, ensuring hazard control and market access. ISO 19600 offers guidelines for general compliance systems across industries. Companies adopt ISO 22000 for GFSI recognition; ISO 19600 for governance frameworks.

Food Safety

ISO 22000

ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

High-Level Structure for integrated management systems
Dual PDCA cycles: organizational and operational
HACCP principles integrated with management system
PRP, OPRP, CCP systematic categorization
Risk-based thinking distinguishing hazards from risks

Compliance Management

ISO 19600

ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems — Guidelines

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Risk-based compliance management framework
Principles of good governance and proportionality
Annex SL structure for integration
PDCA cycle for continuous improvement
Scalable to all organization sizes

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

ISO 22000 Details

What It Is

ISO 22000:2018 is an international certification standard for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). It applies to any organization in the food chain, ensuring safe products through hazard prevention. Built on risk-based thinking, it uses two nested PDCA cycles—organizational for governance and operational for HACCP controls.

Key Components

Clauses 4-10 following High-Level Structure (HLS).
PRPs, hazard analysis, CCPs/OPRPs, traceability, verification.
Integrates Codex HACCP principles with management system requirements.
Certification via accredited bodies with staged audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets regulatory/customer requirements, enables market access.
Reduces recalls, enhances supply chain resilience.
Builds stakeholder trust, supports GFSI schemes like FSSC 22000.
Strategic risk management, operational efficiency gains.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, PRPs, hazard control plan, training, audits.
Scalable for SMEs to multinationals across food sectors globally.
Requires 3-month operation pre-certification; annual surveillance.

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

ISO 19600:2014, officially Compliance management systems — Guidelines, is a Type B guidance standard from the International Organization for Standardization. It provides recommendations for establishing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving a Compliance Management System (CMS) using a risk-based approach. Applicable to all organizations, it follows the Annex SL high-level structure with 10 clauses.

Key Components

Core principles: good governance, proportionality, transparency, sustainability.
Main areas: context analysis, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
PDCA cycle integration; no fixed number of controls—scalable guidance.
Non-certifiable benchmarking tool, predecessor to ISO 37301.

Why Organizations Use It

Mitigates regulatory penalties, operational risks, reputational damage.
Enhances decision-making, efficiency (10-20% cost savings), market access.
Builds integrity culture, future-proofs for certification.
Demonstrates strategic compliance to stakeholders.

Implementation Overview

Phased: leadership commitment, gap analysis, design, rollout, continuous improvement.
Scalable for SMEs to multinationals, all sectors/geographies.
No formal certification; internal audits, self-assessments suffice. (178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	ISO 22000	ISO 19600
Scope	Food safety management systems across food chain	General compliance management systems for all obligations
Industry	Food chain organizations worldwide, all sizes	All industries/sectors globally, scalable to size
Nature	Certifiable management system standard	Non-certifiable guidelines (withdrawn, succeeded by ISO 37301)
Testing	Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits	Internal audits, self-assessments, management reviews
Penalties	Loss of certification, market access restrictions	No formal penalties (guidance only)

Scope

ISO 22000

Food safety management systems across food chain

ISO 19600

General compliance management systems for all obligations

Industry

ISO 22000

Food chain organizations worldwide, all sizes

ISO 19600

All industries/sectors globally, scalable to size

Nature

ISO 22000

Certifiable management system standard

ISO 19600

Non-certifiable guidelines (withdrawn, succeeded by ISO 37301)

Testing

ISO 22000

Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits

ISO 19600

Internal audits, self-assessments, management reviews

Penalties

ISO 22000

Loss of certification, market access restrictions

ISO 19600

No formal penalties (guidance only)

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ISO 22000 and ISO 19600

ISO 22000 FAQ

ISO 19600 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights

Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo

CMMC Sustainment Mastery: Continuous Monitoring, Annual Affirmations, and Subcontractor Flow-Down Playbook

Master CMMC sustainment beyond certification: continuous monitoring dashboards, SPRS/eMASS affirmations, enforceable subcontractor clauses. Get templates for ve

Why the SEC Stepped In: The Investor-Driven Push for Cybersecurity Transparency

Discover why the SEC's 2023 cybersecurity rules treat cyber risks as material financial threats. Explore the 'stick and carrot' approach for standardized disclo

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

FISMA vs CIS Controls

Uncover FISMA vs CIS Controls: Mandatory federal RMF vs prioritized safeguards. Key differences in compliance, risk mgmt & implementation for agencies/contractors. Boost resilience now!

ITIL vs SAFe

Compare ITIL vs SAFe: ITIL masters ITSM with 34 practices for service alignment & compliance; SAFe scales Agile via ARTs for enterprise agility. Unlock the best fit—dive in!

J-SOX vs AS9120B

Compare J-SOX vs AS9120B: Master key differences in financial controls and aerospace quality standards. Unlock compliance strategies, risks, and implementation tips for success. Dive in now!

ISO 22000

ISO 19600

Quick Verdict

ISO 22000

Key Features

ISO 19600

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

ISO 22000 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 22000 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 22000?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 22000?

Does ISO 22000 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 22000 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 22000?

Can ISO 22000 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 22000?

ISO 19600 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 19600?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 19600?

Does ISO 19600 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 19600 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 19600?

Can ISO 19600 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 19600?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights

CMMC Sustainment Mastery: Continuous Monitoring, Annual Affirmations, and Subcontractor Flow-Down Playbook

Why the SEC Stepped In: The Investor-Driven Push for Cybersecurity Transparency

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

FISMA vs CIS Controls

ITIL vs SAFe

J-SOX vs AS9120B