Standards Comparison

    ISO 22000

    Voluntary
    2018

    International standard for food safety management systems

    VS

    ISO 21001

    Voluntary
    2018

    International standard for educational organizations management systems

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 22000 ensures food safety through hazard control and PRPs for food chain organizations, while ISO 21001 drives learner-centered excellence via curriculum design and equity for educational providers. Companies adopt them for certification, risk management, and market trust.

    Food Safety

    ISO 22000

    ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • High-Level Structure enables integrated management systems
    • Dual PDCA cycles for organizational and operational control
    • Integrates HACCP principles with full management system
    • Systematic categorization of PRPs, OPRPs, and CCPs
    • Risk-based thinking and leadership accountability requirements
    Educational Management

    ISO 21001

    ISO 21001: Educational organizations management systems

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Learner-centered processes and principles
    • Annex SL alignment for ISO integration
    • Risk-based planning with PDCA cycle
    • Curriculum design and assessment controls
    • Data protection and accessibility requirements

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 22000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 22000:2018 is the international certification standard for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). It applies to any organization in the food chain, providing a systematic framework to ensure safe food through hazard prevention, regulatory compliance, and chain communication. Built on a risk-based approach with two nested PDCA cycles—one organizational and one operational (HACCP-aligned).

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4-10 following ISO High-Level Structure (HLS).
    • Core elements: PRPs, hazard analysis, OPRPs/CCPs, traceability, verification, internal audits.
    • Integrates Codex HACCP principles with management system requirements.
    • Certification via accredited bodies with staged audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Meets customer/supplier requirements and enables GFSI schemes like FSSC 22000.
    • Reduces recalls, enhances resilience, builds stakeholder trust.
    • Strategic risk management, market access, operational efficiency.
    • Voluntary but often contractually required.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: gap analysis, PRP development, hazard control planning, training, audits. Scalable for SMEs to multinationals across food sectors globally. Requires 6-18 months, cross-functional teams, digital tools for ongoing compliance.

    ISO 21001 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 21001:2025 is the international standard titled Educational organizations — Management systems for educational organizations. It provides a certifiable framework for an Educational Organizations Management System (EOMS), focusing on learner-centered processes to enhance competence development and satisfaction. It uses a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach aligned with Annex SL High Level Structure.

    Key Components

    • Core clauses: context (4), leadership (5), planning (6), support (7), operation (8), evaluation (9), improvement (10).
    • 11 principles including learner focus, accessibility, ethical conduct, data protection.
    • Education-specific requirements for curriculum design, assessment validation, special needs.
    • Certification via accredited bodies with Stage 1/2 audits, surveillance.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Improves learner outcomes, retention, satisfaction (+12-30% reported).
    • Enhances operational efficiency, stakeholder trust, market recognition.
    • Manages risks like data breaches, assessment integrity.
    • Aligns with regulations, SDGs; voluntary but strategic for competitiveness.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: initiation, gap analysis, build, pilot, audit, certify (6-24 months).
    • Involves process mapping, training, internal audits.
    • Applicable to all educational providers; scalable by size.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO 22000
    Food safety management across food chain
    ISO 21001
    Educational management for learning organizations

    Industry

    ISO 22000
    Food production, processing, distribution, retail
    ISO 21001
    Schools, universities, vocational, corporate training

    Nature

    ISO 22000
    Voluntary certifiable management system standard
    ISO 21001
    Voluntary certifiable management system standard

    Testing

    ISO 22000
    Internal audits, hazard verification, management review
    ISO 21001
    Internal audits, learner satisfaction, management review

    Penalties

    ISO 22000
    Loss of certification, market access denial
    ISO 21001
    Loss of certification, accreditation risks

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 22000 and ISO 21001

    ISO 22000 FAQ

    ISO 21001 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages