ISO 22301
International standard for business continuity management systems
ISO 27017
International standard for cloud-specific information security controls
Quick Verdict
ISO 22301 builds resilient BCMS for disruptions across industries, while ISO 27017 extends ISO 27001 with cloud-specific security controls. Companies adopt 22301 for operational continuity and 27017 for secure cloud environments and procurement trust.
ISO 22301
ISO 22301:2019 Business Continuity Management Systems
Key Features
- PDCA cycle drives continual BCMS improvement
- Requires Business Impact Analysis and risk assessment
- Annex SL structure enables ISO standards integration
- Mandates operational testing and exercises
- Ensures top management leadership commitment
ISO 27017
ISO/IEC 27017:2015 Code of practice for cloud security controls
Key Features
- Clarifies shared responsibilities between CSPs and CSCs
- Adds seven cloud-specific CLD security controls
- Provides guidance for 37 ISO 27002 controls in cloud
- Addresses multi-tenancy segregation and VM hardening
- Integrates directly into ISO 27001 ISMS audits
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 22301 Details
What It Is
ISO 22301:2019 is an international certification standard for Business Continuity Management Systems (BCMS). It provides requirements to protect against, reduce likelihood of, respond to, and recover from disruptions, ensuring critical operations continue. Built on a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach with Annex SL high-level structure for easy integration.
Key Components
- 10 clauses (4-10 core): context, leadership, planning (BIA/risk assessment), support, operation (strategies/testing), evaluation (audits/reviews), improvement.
- No prescriptive controls; flexible, organization-specific.
- Core principles: resilience, continual improvement.
- 3-year certification with annual surveillance audits.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances resilience, minimizes downtime/financial losses, ensures regulatory compliance (e.g., NIS Directive), builds stakeholder trust/reputation, provides competitive edges like procurement advantages and lower insurance premiums.
Implementation Overview
Gap analysis, BIA, policy development, training, testing, audits. Applies to all sizes/sectors globally. Typical 60 days to 6 months with tools; two-stage certification process.
ISO 27017 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27017:2015 is a code of practice extending ISO/IEC 27002 with cloud-specific guidance. It provides implementation advice for information security controls in cloud services, focusing on public, private, and hybrid models across IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS. Its risk-based approach clarifies shared responsibilities between cloud service providers (CSPs) and customers (CSCs).
Key Components
- Guidance on 37 existing ISO 27002 controls adapted for cloud.
- Seven additional CLD cloud-specific controls (e.g., segregation, VM hardening, asset removal).
- Built on ISO 27001 ISMS framework.
- Assessed via ISO 27001 audits with 27017 scope extension; no standalone certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Addresses cloud risks like multi-tenancy and shared responsibility.
- Supports regulatory compliance (e.g., GDPR via alignment).
- Enhances risk management and procurement trust.
- Provides competitive differentiation for CSPs and assurance for CSCs.
Implementation Overview
- Integrate into existing ISO 27001 ISMS via risk assessment and control mapping.
- Key activities: define responsibilities, configure virtualization controls, enable monitoring.
- Applicable to CSPs, CSCs across sizes/industries; global scope.
- Joint audits typically 9-12 months. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 22301 | ISO 27017 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Business continuity management systems | Cloud-specific information security controls |
| Industry | All sectors worldwide, all sizes | Cloud service providers and customers globally |
| Nature | Certifiable management system standard | Guidance code of practice for ISO 27001 |
| Testing | BIA, recovery testing, annual audits | Integrated into ISO 27001 audits, no standalone |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | No direct penalties, affects ISO 27001 compliance |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 22301 and ISO 27017
ISO 22301 FAQ
ISO 27017 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
HITRUST CSF MyCSF Platform Deep Dive: Automating Evidence Collection for Continuous R2 Renewal in Multi-Regulated Environments 2025
Unpack MyCSF's AI features for HITRUST CSF: automate evidence tagging, maturity scoring & monitoring for R2 renewals amid 2025 regs. CISOs in healthcare/fintech
NIST CSF 2.0 Govern Function Deep Dive: Building Executive Cybersecurity Governance from Scratch
Step-by-step blueprint for NIST CSF 2.0 Govern function: templates, RACI matrices, metrics to elevate cybersecurity governance to boardroom level. Reduce breach
You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIS2 in Your Organization
Master NIS2 implementation with our detailed guide. Learn requirements, risk assessment, supply chain security, and compliance steps for your organization. Star
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs MAS TRM
Compare FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs MAS TRM: Decode electronic records, signatures & tech risk rules. Align compliance strategies for pharma-finance success—read now!
NIST 800-53 vs ISO 22301
Compare NIST 800-53 vs ISO 22301: Security controls catalog vs BCM resilience framework. Uncover baselines, tailoring, RMF integration for compliance wins. Boost your strategy now!
ISO 31000 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Discover ISO 31000 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Align global risk guidelines with mandatory disclosures. Key differences, synergies & strategies for resilient governance. Read now!