GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/ISO 27017 vs ISO 22301
    Standards Comparison

    ISO 27017 vs ISO 22301

    ISO 27017

    Voluntary
    2015

    Code of practice for cloud information security controls

    VS

    ISO 22301

    Voluntary
    2019

    International standard for business continuity management systems.

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 27017 provides cloud-specific security guidance within ISO 27001 ISMS for CSPs and customers, while ISO 22301 establishes certifiable BCMS for operational resilience across sectors. Companies adopt them for cloud risk management and disruption recovery.

    Cloud Security

    ISO 27017

    ISO/IEC 27017:2015 cloud security controls

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Introduces 7 cloud-specific controls for multi-tenancy segregation
    • Clarifies shared responsibilities between CSPs and CSCs
    • Provides guidance for 37 ISO 27002 controls in cloud
    • Addresses virtual machine hardening and configuration management
    • Enables customer monitoring of cloud service activities
    Business Continuity

    ISO 22301

    ISO 22301:2019 Business continuity management systems Requirements

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    0-6 months

    Key Features

    • PDCA cycle for continual BCMS improvement
    • Business Impact Analysis (BIA) and risk assessment
    • Leadership commitment with policy and roles
    • Operational testing and recovery strategies
    • Integration with ISO 27001 and other standards

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 27017 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 27017:2015 is a code of practice extending ISO/IEC 27002 with cloud-specific information security controls. It provides implementation guidance for cloud services across IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS, focusing on shared responsibilities in multi-tenant environments. Its risk-based approach integrates into ISO 27001 ISMS.

    Key Components

    • Guidance on 37 ISO 27002 controls adapted for cloud.
    • 7 additional CLD controls (e.g., segregation, VM hardening, asset removal).
    • Dual perspectives for CSPs and CSCs.
    • Assessed within ISO 27001 audits, no standalone certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Enhances cloud risk management, clarifies responsibilities, supports GDPR/CCPA alignment, boosts procurement trust, and differentiates CSPs. Builds stakeholder confidence through auditable cloud controls.

    Implementation Overview

    Integrate via ISO 27001 risk assessment, map controls, configure cloud environments. Suited for CSPs, CSCs of all sizes; joint audits take 9-12 months. Focuses on maturity in monitoring, segregation.

    ISO 22301 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 22301:2019 is the international certification standard for Business Continuity Management Systems (BCMS). It specifies requirements to protect against, reduce likelihood of, respond to, and recover from disruptions, ensuring continuity of critical operations. Adopting a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle and Annex SL high-level structure, it enables flexible implementation across organizations.

    Key Components

    • 10 clauses (4-10 auditable): context of organization, leadership, planning (BIA, risk assessment), support, operation (strategies, testing), performance evaluation (audits, reviews), improvement.
    • Core principles: Business Impact Analysis (BIA), Recovery Time Objectives (RTO), continual enhancement.
    • 3-year certification with annual surveillance audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Builds resilience against cyber threats, pandemics, disasters; minimizes downtime, financial losses.
    • Ensures regulatory compliance (e.g., NIS Directive, NIST); enhances reputation, stakeholder trust.
    • Provides competitive advantages, lower insurance premiums, procurement edges.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased approach: gap analysis, leadership buy-in, BIA/risk assessment, documentation, training, testing, certification (6-8 weeks Stage 1/2).
    • Suits all sizes/sectors globally; tools accelerate to 60 days-6 months.

    Key Differences

    AspectISO 27017ISO 22301
    ScopeCloud-specific security controlsBusiness continuity management system
    IndustryCloud providers and customers globallyAll sectors worldwide
    NatureGuidance code of practiceCertifiable management system standard
    TestingIntegrated into ISO 27001 auditsBCMS exercises and audits required
    PenaltiesLoss of certificationNo legal penalties

    Scope

    ISO 27017
    Cloud-specific security controls
    ISO 22301
    Business continuity management system

    Industry

    ISO 27017
    Cloud providers and customers globally
    ISO 22301
    All sectors worldwide

    Nature

    ISO 27017
    Guidance code of practice
    ISO 22301
    Certifiable management system standard

    Testing

    ISO 27017
    Integrated into ISO 27001 audits
    ISO 22301
    BCMS exercises and audits required

    Penalties

    ISO 27017
    Loss of certification
    ISO 22301
    No legal penalties

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 27017 and ISO 22301

    ISO 27017 FAQ

    ISO 22301 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    From SOC to AI-Native CDC: Redefining Triage and Response in 2026

    From SOC to AI-Native CDC: Redefining Triage and Response in 2026

    Explore the shift from SOCs to AI-Native CDCs. Autonomous agents handle Tier 1 triage in 2026, empowering analysts for complex threats. Discover the future of c

    TISAX Tabletop Exercises for EV Battery Suppliers: Ransomware Drill Scripts and AAR Templates with 2025 ENX Podcast Breakdown

    TISAX Tabletop Exercises for EV Battery Suppliers: Ransomware Drill Scripts and AAR Templates with 2025 ENX Podcast Breakdown

    Practical TISAX tabletop scripts for EV battery suppliers facing 'Very High' ASLP. Download ransomware AAR templates, get 2024 ENX lessons & 2025 podcast on VDA

    How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

    How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

    Deploy CIS Controls v8.1 as a control backbone for NIS2 & DORA compliance. Step-by-step roadmap (IG1→IG2), deliverables, metrics & evidence model for hybrid/clo

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how ISO 27017 and ISO 22301 compare against other standards

    Other ISO 27017 Comparisons

    • APPI vs ISO 27017
    • ISO 27018 vs ISO 27017
    • DORA vs ISO 27017
    • PCI DSS vs ISO 27017
    • CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs ISO 27017

    Other ISO 22301 Comparisons

    • ISO 37301 vs ISO 22301
    • DORA vs ISO 22301
    • CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs ISO 22301
    • FedRAMP vs ISO 22301
    • ISO 22301 vs GDPR
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved