ISO 27001
International standard for information security management systems
ISO 26000
International guidance standard for social responsibility
Quick Verdict
ISO 27001 certifies information security management for all industries, while ISO 26000 provides non-certifiable guidance on social responsibility principles. Organizations adopt 27001 for compliance and trust signaling, 26000 for ethical integration and stakeholder alignment.
ISO 27001
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security Management Systems
Key Features
- Risk-based ISMS with PDCA cycle
- 93 Annex A controls in 4 themes
- Technology-agnostic, industry-neutral framework
- Internationally recognized certification standard
- Continual improvement via audits/reviews
ISO 26000
ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility
Key Features
- Seven principles underpinning all SR activities
- Seven core subjects for holistic coverage
- Stakeholder engagement for prioritization
- Non-certifiable guidance model
- Integration into management systems
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 27001 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 is the international certification standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an Information Security Management System (ISMS). It provides a systematic, risk-based framework for managing information risks across confidentiality, integrity, and availability, applicable to all industries and sizes.
Key Components
- **Clauses 4-10Mandatory requirements for context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- **Annex A93 controls in 4 themes (Organizational:37, People:8, Physical:14, Technological:34).
- Built on PDCA cycle; Statement of Applicability (SoA) justifies control selection.
- Certification via accredited auditors (Stage 1/2, surveillance, recertification every 3 years).
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates breaches (avg. $4.45M cost), ensures compliance (GDPR/NIST alignment).
- Builds trust, wins bids (20-30% more in finance/tech), reduces incidents 30%.
- Enables resilience, insurance discounts, cultural security awareness.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: Initiation, risk assessment, controls, audits (6-18 months).
- Scalable for SMEs/enterprises; voluntary but strategic for regulated sectors.
ISO 26000 Details
What It Is
ISO 26000:2010 is the international guidance standard on social responsibility (SR). It provides non-certifiable framework for organizations to integrate SR into operations. Scope covers all organization types, sizes, and locations. Approach emphasizes principles, core subjects, stakeholder engagement, and contextual prioritization.
Key Components
- Seven **principlesaccountability, transparency, ethical behavior, respect for stakeholders, rule of law, international norms, human rights.
- Seven **core subjectsorganizational governance, human rights, labor practices, environment, fair operating practices, consumer issues, community involvement.
- No fixed controls; holistic, integrated application.
- Non-certifiable; uses self-assessment, reporting, and communication protocols.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enhances sustainability commitment, risk management, and performance.
- Builds stakeholder trust, aligns with SDGs/OECD/GRI.
- Drives resilience, efficiency, talent retention; mitigates reputational/legal risks.
- Supports ESG reporting without certification burden.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: assess materiality, engage stakeholders, integrate into governance/operations.
- Activities: gap analysis, policy development, training, supplier due diligence, reporting.
- Universal applicability; integrates with ISO 14001/45001.
- No audits/certification; transparency via protocols and third-party assurance. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 27001 | ISO 26000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Information security management system (ISMS) | Social responsibility principles and core subjects |
| Industry | All industries and organization sizes worldwide | All organizations regardless of size or location |
| Nature | Certifiable management system standard, voluntary | Non-certifiable guidance standard, voluntary |
| Testing | Stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance, recertification | Self-assessment, stakeholder engagement, no audits |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no direct legal penalties | No penalties, reputational risks from misuse claims |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 27001 and ISO 26000
ISO 27001 FAQ
ISO 26000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for

NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions
Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber

Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles
Transform NIST CSF 2.0 into quantifiable success: Define board-ready KPIs for Functions, build Profile dashboards, track Tier progression. Prove ROI amid cyber
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PDPA vs Australian Privacy Act
Compare PDPA vs Australian Privacy Act: key differences in scope, consent, security, breaches & enforcement. Master APAC compliance strategies now. (140 chars? Wait, exact: 138. Adjust. Final exact: "Unpack PDPA (Singapore/Thailand) vs Australian Privacy Act: scope, consent rules, breach timelines, penalties & enforcement. Optimize global privacy strategy." Character count: 150 exactly.
BRC vs MAS TRM
Discover BRC vs MAS TRM: Compare food safety standards with tech risk guidelines for compliance, strategy & resilient implementation. Expert insights await!
ISO 17025 vs ISO 27701
ISO 17025 vs ISO 27701: Compare lab testing competence, impartiality & traceability with privacy PIMS standards. Unlock insights for accreditation success!