What is the primary objective of ISO 27018?

**ISO 27018 provides a code of practice for protecting PII in public clouds acting as PII processors.** It extends ISO 27002 with cloud-specific privacy controls addressing consent, purpose limitation, transparency, sub-processor management, logging, breach notification, and secure data deletion to ensure processors meet controller obligations in multi-tenant environments.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 27018?

**ISO 27018 applies to public cloud service providers acting as PII processors under contract.** It targets SaaS vendors, hyperscalers, and any organization processing customer PII in public clouds; controllers use it for due diligence, though not directly required by law, it supports GDPR Article 28 processor obligations and procurement in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance.

Does ISO 27018 require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 27018 requires assessment within ISO 27001 certification audits by accredited bodies.** No standalone certification exists; auditors evaluate additional PII controls during ISO 27001 stage 1/2 audits, with ongoing surveillance; certificates reference both standards, valid for three years.

How often should an assessment for ISO 27018 be performed?

**ISO 27018 assessments occur annually via surveillance audits within the ISO 27001 cycle.** Full recertification happens every three years; continuous monitoring of controls like logging and configurations is required ongoing, with gap analyses for updates like the 2025 edition.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 27018?

**Non-compliance with ISO 27018 risks failed ISO 27001 certification and regulatory breaches.** Lapses in PII controls can lead to GDPR fines up to 4% of global turnover, lost contracts, reputational damage, and cyber insurance denials; no direct ISO penalties, but undermines processor assurances.

Can ISO 27018 be mapped to other international frameworks?

**ISO 27018 maps directly to ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27701, and CSA CCM.** Controls align with GDPR processor requirements, SOC 2 privacy criteria, and NIST privacy frameworks via shared security baselines; GRC tools enable cross-mapping for evidence reuse.

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 27018?

**Conduct a gap analysis against existing ISO 27001 ISMS and ISO 27018 controls.** Review current PII processing, sub-processors, logging, and policies; update Statement of Applicability to include ~25-30 additional controls, prioritizing transparency and breach processes.

What is the primary objective of **U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules**?

**The primary objective is to enhance and standardize disclosures on cybersecurity incidents, risk management, strategy, and governance for public companies.** Adopted in Release No. 33-11216, the rules address inconsistent prior practices by requiring timely Form 8-K filings for material incidents and annual Item 106 narratives in Form 10-K, improving investor access to comparable information on cyber risks affecting operations and financial condition.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules**?

**All Exchange Act reporting companies, including domestic issuers, foreign private issuers, smaller reporting companies, and emerging growth companies, must comply.** This encompasses filers of Forms 10-K/8-K (domestics) and 20-F/6-K (FPIs), with no broad exemptions; business development companies are explicitly included.

Does **U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No external audit or third-party certification is required for compliance.** The rules rely on self-reported disclosures subject to SEC review, enforcement, and exams; assurance comes via disclosure controls, internal audits, and potential Division of Examinations scrutiny of governance and processes.

How often should an assessment for **U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules** be performed?

**Ongoing assessments are required, with annual disclosures for fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2023, and continuous materiality evaluations for incidents.** Risk management processes must be continuously maintained, with Item 106 updated yearly in Form 10-K; incident assessments occur as events arise, without unreasonable delay.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules**?

**Non-compliance risks SEC enforcement actions, civil penalties, injunctions, and shareholder litigation.** Historical cases like Yahoo ($35M), Meta ($100M), and Ashford (penalty plus injunction) demonstrate penalties for untimely or misleading disclosures; violations tie to antifraud provisions, with exams targeting controls and governance failures.

Can **U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, mappings exist to frameworks like NIST CSF, ISO 27001, and COSO ERM.** Item 106 disclosures often reference these for risk processes; integration with ERM aligns with NIST Govern function, while incident response parallels NIST Detect/Respond, facilitating evidence reuse across regimes.

What is the first step to begin implementing **U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules**?

**Conduct a cross-functional gap analysis against rule requirements.** Assemble steering team (legal, CISO, CFO, IR) to map current processes to Item 1.05/106, inventory assets/third-parties, and develop materiality framework, per phased implementation guidance.

ISO 27018 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

Standards Comparison

ISO 27018

Voluntary

2019

Code of practice for PII protection in public cloud processors.

U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

Mandatory

2023

U.S. SEC rules mandating cybersecurity incident and governance disclosures

Quick Verdict

ISO 27018 provides voluntary cloud PII processor controls globally, while U.S. SEC rules mandate rapid incident disclosures and governance reporting for public companies. Processors adopt ISO for certification; registrants comply to avoid SEC penalties and inform investors.

Cloud Privacy

ISO 27018

ISO/IEC 27018:2025 Code of practice for PII in public clouds

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Protects PII specifically for public cloud processors
Mandates sub-processor transparency and equivalent obligations
Requires prompt breach notification to controllers
Enforces secure PII deletion and return on termination
Extends ISO 27002 with cloud privacy implementation guidance

Capital Markets

U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Four-business-day material incident disclosure via Form 8-K Item 1.05
Annual cybersecurity risk management and governance in Regulation S-K Item 106
Inline XBRL tagging for machine-readable disclosures
Board oversight and management expertise disclosures
Third-party cybersecurity risk oversight processes

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

ISO 27018 Details

What It Is

ISO/IEC 27018:2025 is a code of practice extending ISO/IEC 27002 for protecting personally identifiable information (PII) in public clouds where providers act as PII processors. Its primary scope targets cloud service providers handling customer PII under contract, using a risk-based approach layered on an ISO 27001 ISMS.

Key Components

Core themes: consent/purpose limitation, transparency, data minimization, sub-processor management, logging/auditability, breach notification, secure deletion.
Aligns with ISO/IEC 29100 privacy principles; adds ~25-30 cloud-PII controls to 93 ISO 27002 controls.
Certification via ISO 27001 audits with ISO 27018 extensions; three-year validity with annual surveillance.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets processor obligations under GDPR-like laws; reduces procurement friction via audited transparency.
Enhances risk management for multi-tenant clouds; builds customer trust in PII handling.
Competitive edge for SaaS/cloud vendors; supports due diligence and contracts.

Implementation Overview

Conduct gap analysis on existing ISO 27001 ISMS; update SoA, policies, controls.
Applies to cloud PII processors of all sizes; requires GRC tools, cloud monitoring.
External audits by accredited bodies; phased upgrades for 2025 edition.

U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules Details

What It Is

U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules (Release No. 33-11216) are federal regulations amending Regulation S-K and Forms 8-K/10-K. They mandate standardized disclosures for public companies on cybersecurity incidents, risk management, strategy, and governance. The approach is materiality-based, aligning with securities law principles without bright-line thresholds.

Key Components

**Form 8-K Item 1.05Four-business-day reporting of material incidents.
**Regulation S-K Item 106Annual disclosures on processes, impacts, board oversight, and management roles.
Inline XBRL tagging for comparability.
Applies to all Exchange Act registrants; no certification but ties to disclosure controls.

Why Organizations Use It

Public companies comply to meet legal obligations, protect investors via timely information, enhance capital market efficiency, and reduce enforcement risks like fines seen in Yahoo/Meta cases. Builds trust, integrates cyber into ERM, and signals governance maturity.

Implementation Overview

Cross-functional gap analysis, playbook development, process integration with IRP/DCP. Applies to domestic/foreign issuers; phased compliance (Dec 2023+). No external certification; SEC exams/enforcement verify.

Key Differences

Aspect	ISO 27018	U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Scope	PII protection in public cloud processors	Public company cyber incident/governance disclosures
Industry	Cloud/SaaS providers processing PII globally	All SEC registrants, primarily U.S. public companies
Nature	Voluntary international code of practice	Mandatory SEC reporting regulation
Testing	ISO 27001 audits with 27018 controls	Internal disclosure controls, SEC review
Penalties	Loss of certification, no legal fines	SEC enforcement, civil penalties, injunctions

Scope

ISO 27018

PII protection in public cloud processors

U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

Public company cyber incident/governance disclosures

Industry

ISO 27018

Cloud/SaaS providers processing PII globally

U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

All SEC registrants, primarily U.S. public companies

Nature

ISO 27018

Voluntary international code of practice

U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

Mandatory SEC reporting regulation

Testing

ISO 27018

ISO 27001 audits with 27018 controls

U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

Internal disclosure controls, SEC review

Penalties

ISO 27018

Loss of certification, no legal fines

U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

SEC enforcement, civil penalties, injunctions

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ISO 27018 and U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

ISO 27018 FAQ

U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Image this: What if GDPR would have NOT been implemented by the EU

What if the EU never implemented GDPR? Explore this hypothetical: consumer data protection in Dec 2025, key differences, pros/cons for users & companies. Read t

Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages

Uncover top 5 unseen complexities modern compliance software manages effortlessly—from sensitive data mapping to real-time regulatory shifts. Automate audits, i

Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles

Transform NIST CSF 2.0 into quantifiable success: Define board-ready KPIs for Functions, build Profile dashboards, track Tier progression. Prove ROI amid cyber

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

RoHS vs COBIT

Discover RoHS vs COBIT: Contrast EU's hazardous substances directive for EEE compliance with ISACA's IT governance framework. Unlock strategies for risk management, exemptions & audits. Compare now!

GDPR vs GMP

GDPR vs GMP: EU data privacy gold standard meets pharma manufacturing rules. Uncover key differences, compliance tips, fines up to 4% turnover, and strategies for seamless operations. Dive in!

ISO 27001 vs ISO 37301

Compare ISO 27001 vs ISO 37301: InfoSec mastery vs full compliance systems. Uncover differences, benefits, risks & implementation guide to choose wisely. Boost resilience now!

ISO 27018

U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

Quick Verdict

ISO 27018

Key Features

U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

ISO 27018 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 27018 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 27018?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 27018?

Does ISO 27018 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 27018 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 27018?

Can ISO 27018 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 27018?

U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules FAQ

What is the primary objective of U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules?

Does U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules?

Can U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Image this: What if GDPR would have NOT been implemented by the EU

Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages

Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

RoHS vs COBIT

GDPR vs GMP

ISO 27001 vs ISO 37301