ISO 27032
Guidelines for Internet security and multi-stakeholder cybersecurity
AS9110C
Aerospace QMS standard for aviation maintenance organizations.
Quick Verdict
ISO 27032 offers cybersecurity guidelines for internet security across industries, while AS9110C mandates a certifiable QMS for aviation MRO. Organizations adopt ISO 27032 for collaborative cyber resilience; AS9110C for regulatory compliance and market access in aerospace.
ISO 27032
ISO/IEC 27032:2023 Cybersecurity Guidelines for Internet Security
Key Features
- Emphasizes multi-stakeholder collaboration across cyberspace ecosystems
- Provides guidelines for Internet-specific security risks
- Includes Annex A mapping to ISO 27002 controls
- Focuses on incident coordination and information sharing
- Defines roles for diverse cybersecurity stakeholders
AS9110C
AS9110C: Quality Management Systems for Aviation Maintenance
Key Features
- Configuration management and traceability controls
- Counterfeit parts prevention processes
- Risk-based thinking in operations
- Human factors and competence verification
- Regulatory alignment with FAA/EASA Part-145
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 27032 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27032:2023, titled Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security, is an international guidance standard. It provides non-certifiable recommendations for managing Internet security risks in cyberspace, connecting information security, network security, Internet security, and CIIP. It uses a risk-based, collaborative approach emphasizing multi-stakeholder ecosystems.
Key Components
- Core areas: risk assessment, incident management, stakeholder roles, technical/organizational controls.
- Annex A maps threats to ISO/IEC 27002 controls.
- Built on PDCA cycle and collaboration principles.
- No fixed controls; integrates with ISO 27001 ISMS via Statement of Applicability.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances resilience, reduces breach impacts, aligns with regulations like NIS2/GDPR. Offers competitive differentiation, operational efficiency, stakeholder trust, and future-proofing against evolving threats.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, risk assessment, controls deployment, monitoring. Applies to all sizes/industries with online presence; no certification, but audits recommended for continuous improvement.
AS9110C Details
What It Is
AS9110C, full name Quality Management Systems Requirements for Aviation Maintenance Organizations, is a certification standard building on ISO 9001:2015 for aerospace MRO providers. It ensures safe aircraft maintenance via risk-based thinking, PDCA cycles, and aviation-specific controls.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10 (HLS structure) with additions for configuration management, counterfeit prevention, human factors, traceability.
- ~28 supplemental requirements beyond ISO 9001.
- Core principles: leadership commitment, operational planning, performance evaluation.
- Third-party certification by accredited registrars.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets OEM/airline contracts, FAA/EASA alignment.
- Mitigates safety risks, reduces rework/downtime.
- Enables market access, OASIS listing.
- Builds stakeholder trust via demonstrable airworthiness.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process mapping, training, internal audits.
- Targets global MROs; 6-12 months typical.
- Requires operational QMS exercise pre-certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 27032 | AS9110C |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Internet security guidelines in cyberspace | Aerospace MRO quality management system |
| Industry | All organizations with online presence globally | Aviation maintenance, repair, overhaul organizations |
| Nature | Non-certifiable informative guidance standard | Certifiable QMS standard based on ISO 9001 |
| Testing | Gap analysis, self-assessments, exercises | Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits |
| Penalties | No direct penalties, reputational/business risks | Loss of certification, regulatory/contractual sanctions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 27032 and AS9110C
ISO 27032 FAQ
AS9110C FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
One Step at a Time - a 6 Month Plan to Live and Breath DORA
Achieve DORA compliance in 6 months with our detailed plan. Learn implementation sequence, starting steps, pitfalls to avoid, and accelerators for success. Toug
CMMC Scoping Mastery for Defense Supply Chains: Enclave Mapping, Subcontractor Flow-Down, and CUI Inventory Blueprint
Master CMMC scoping for DIB: delineate FCI/CUI boundaries, segment enclaves, manage subcontractor flow-down. Prevent 80% assessment failures with SSP templates,
What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...
Explore a world without mandatory GDPR: How would organizations manage data? What data privacy regs would emerge? Uncover impacts on businesses and privacy laws
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
K-PIPA vs EPA
Discover K-PIPA vs EPA: South Korea's strict privacy law meets U.S. environmental standards. Unlock compliance insights, risks & strategies for global success.
CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs NIST 800-171
Unlock CSL vs NIST 800-171: Compare China's data localization & governance mandates with US CUI protections. Key insights on compliance risks, strategies & global implementation.
ISO 26000 vs AS9110C
ISO 26000 vs AS9110C: Non-certifiable SR guidance meets certifiable aerospace QMS. Discover key differences, integration benefits for sustainable aviation ops. Align strategy now! (152)