Standards Comparison

    K-PIPA

    Mandatory
    2011

    South Korea's stringent regulation for personal data protection

    VS

    EPA

    Mandatory
    1970

    U.S. federal regulations for environmental protection compliance

    Quick Verdict

    K-PIPA enforces stringent data privacy for Korean residents' info with consent and CPO mandates, while EPA regulates U.S. environmental impacts via emissions limits and monitoring. Companies adopt K-PIPA for Korea market access, EPA to avoid massive fines and ensure operations.

    Data Privacy

    K-PIPA

    Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Mandatory independent Chief Privacy Officers for all data handlers
    • Granular explicit consent for sensitive data and transfers
    • 72-hour breach notifications to subjects and regulators
    • Extraterritorial application to foreign entities targeting Koreans
    • Revenue-based fines up to 3% of annual global revenue
    Environmental Protection

    EPA

    U.S. EPA Regulatory Standards (40 CFR)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Multi-media standards for air, water, waste
    • Facility-specific permits with state implementation
    • Evidence-driven MRR for compliance proof
    • Health- and technology-based performance limits
    • Structured enforcement with civil penalties

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    K-PIPA Details

    What It Is

    K-PIPA, or the Personal Information Protection Act, is South Korea's comprehensive data protection regulation enacted in 2011 with major amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024. It establishes a consent-centric, risk-based framework governing collection, use, storage, transfer, and destruction of personal, sensitive, and unique identification information by all data handlers, including foreign entities targeting Korean residents.

    Key Components

    • Core principles: transparency, purpose limitation, data minimization, explicit consent.
    • Obligations: mandatory CPOs, granular consents, 10-day data subject rights responses, 72-hour breach notifications, security measures like encryption.
    • Enforcement by PIPC with fines up to 3% revenue; no fixed controls but tiered for large entities.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Compliance avoids severe penalties (e.g., Google's KRW 70B fine), enables EU adequacy data flows, builds trust, supports AI/innovation via pseudonymization, and provides competitive edge in privacy-sensitive markets.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: gap analysis, CPO appointment, data mapping, PbD integration, training, audits. Applies universally to public/private handlers; no certification but PIPC guidelines/ISMS-P recommended. Suited for all sizes, extraterritorial scope.

    EPA Details

    What It Is

    EPA standards comprise the family of U.S. federal regulations enforced by the Environmental Protection Agency, implementing statutes like Clean Air Act (CAA), Clean Water Act (CWA), and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Codified in 40 CFR, they protect human health and environment via legally binding limits. Approach blends health-based ambient criteria with technology-based performance standards.

    Key Components

    • Pillars: air (NAAQS, MACT/NSPS), water (effluent guidelines, NPDES/WQS), waste (RCRA TSDF controls).
    • Numeric limits, thresholds, monitoring/recordkeeping/reporting (MRR), permitting.
    • Built on statutory authority; no certification but permit/audit compliance.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for regulated entities to avoid multimillion penalties.
    • Mitigates enforcement risks, ensures operational continuity.
    • Drives ESG, efficiency, stakeholder trust via transparency tools (ECHO, ICIS).

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, controls, digital MRR, training.
    • Targets industries (energy, manufacturing); scalable by size.
    • Ongoing via permits, state programs, inspections.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    K-PIPA
    Personal data protection, consent, rights
    EPA
    Environmental protection, emissions, waste

    Industry

    K-PIPA
    All sectors processing Korean data
    EPA
    Industrial sectors, manufacturing, energy

    Nature

    K-PIPA
    Mandatory data privacy regulation
    EPA
    Mandatory environmental regulations

    Testing

    K-PIPA
    CPO audits, security assessments
    EPA
    Monitoring, sampling, inspections

    Penalties

    K-PIPA
    3% revenue fines, imprisonment
    EPA
    Civil fines, criminal liability

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about K-PIPA and EPA

    K-PIPA FAQ

    EPA FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages