ISO 27032
International guidelines for Internet cybersecurity and collaboration
GRI
Global framework for sustainability impact reporting
Quick Verdict
ISO 27032 provides cybersecurity guidelines for internet security and collaboration, while GRI offers sustainability standards for impact reporting on environment and society. Companies adopt ISO 27032 for cyber resilience and GRI for stakeholder accountability and regulatory alignment.
ISO 27032
ISO/IEC 27032:2023 Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security
Key Features
- Multi-stakeholder collaboration for cyberspace security
- Guidelines bridging info, network, Internet security
- Annex A mapping to ISO 27002 controls
- Risk assessment for Internet-specific threats
- Emphasis on detection, response, continuous improvement
GRI
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards
Key Features
- Impact-based materiality process (GRI 3)
- Modular Universal, Sector, Topic Standards
- Mandatory GRI Content Index for traceability
- Worker scope includes contractors and supply chain
- Interoperable with SASB and regulatory frameworks
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 27032 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27032:2023 is an international guidance standard titled Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security. It provides non-certifiable recommendations for managing Internet security risks in interconnected ecosystems, connecting information security, network security, Internet security, and CIIP. Adopts a risk-based, collaborative approach emphasizing multi-stakeholder roles.
Key Components
- Thematic domains: risk assessment, incident management, stakeholder collaboration, technical/organizational controls.
- Annex A maps threats to ISO/IEC 27002's 93 controls.
- Core principles: multi-stakeholder cooperation, PDCA cycle, layered cyberspace (technical, informational, human).
- No certification; integrates into ISO 27001 ISMS via Statement of Applicability.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances resilience against Internet threats, reduces breach costs, builds stakeholder trust. Supports regulatory alignment (e.g., NIS2, GDPR), competitive differentiation, operational efficiency. Lowers insurance premiums, shortens incident dwell time.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, risk assessment, controls deployment, monitoring. Applies to all sizes/industries with online presence; uses existing frameworks. No audits required, but periodic reviews ensure continuous improvement. (178 words)
GRI Details
What It Is
GRI Standards, officially the Global Reporting Initiative Standards, are a modular sustainability reporting framework. Their primary purpose is to enable organizations to disclose significant economic, environmental, and social impacts through an impact-centric materiality approach, prioritizing actual and potential effects on stakeholders over financial materiality alone.
Key Components
- Universal Standards (GRI 1: Foundation, GRI 2: General Disclosures, GRI 3: Material Topics) apply to all reporters.
- Topic Standards (e.g., GRI 403 Occupational Health & Safety, GRI 308 Supplier Environmental Assessment) for specific disclosures.
- Sector Standards for high-impact industries like Oil & Gas. Built on principles like accuracy, balance, verifiability; compliance via GRI Content Index; no formal certification, but assurance encouraged.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives stakeholder accountability, regulatory alignment (e.g., EU CSRD), risk management for HES impacts, and benchmarking. Enhances trust, capital access, and operational efficiency.
Implementation Overview
Phased: materiality assessment, data systems, disclosures. Applies universally; requires governance, stakeholder engagement, and traceability for "in accordance" reporting.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 27032 | GRI |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Internet security, cyberspace risks, stakeholder collaboration | Sustainability impacts on economy, environment, people |
| Industry | All with online presence, critical infrastructure globally | All sectors, high-impact industries like mining, energy |
| Nature | Voluntary guidelines, non-certifiable | Voluntary reporting standards, non-certifiable |
| Testing | Gap analysis, audits, exercises, no certification | Materiality assessments, internal audits, external assurance |
| Penalties | No direct penalties, increased breach risks | No direct penalties, reputational and regulatory risks |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 27032 and GRI
ISO 27032 FAQ
GRI FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
SOC 2 for Fintech Startups: First 5 Steps to Compliance with Confidentiality Criterion Infographic
First 5 steps to SOC 2 compliance with Confidentiality for fintech SaaS. Infographic maps controls to risks like encryption & TPRM. Integrates GLBA/PCI DSS over
The Panoramic View: How Integrated Compliance Monitoring Creates Unprecedented Organizational Visibility and Adaptability
Gain unprecedented organizational visibility with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time alerts, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 adherence, reduce risks, and
Your Guide to Implementing PCI DSS in Your Organization
Step-by-step guide to implementing PCI DSS in your organization. Achieve compliance, protect cardholder data, and reduce risks. Start securing payments today!
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
OSHA vs FDA 21 CFR Part 11
Compare OSHA vs FDA 21 CFR Part 11: Workplace safety standards vs electronic records compliance. Expert insights to navigate rules, cut risks, boost efficiency. Achieve mastery today!
ISO 20000 vs IFS Food
Dive into ISO 20000 vs IFS Food: IT service management meets food safety standards. Uncover key differences, benefits & strategies to boost compliance success now!
ISO 37301 vs CSA
Discover ISO 37301 vs CSA: Certifiable CMS (ISO 37301) excels in risk-based compliance, leadership & integration vs CSA Z1000/Z1002 OHS standards. Boost efficacy—compare now!