ISO 27032
International guidelines for Internet cybersecurity and collaboration
IFS Food
GFSI standard for food safety and process compliance.
Quick Verdict
ISO 27032 offers voluntary cybersecurity guidelines for internet ecosystems across industries, while IFS Food mandates certifiable food safety audits for manufacturers. Organizations adopt ISO 27032 for resilient digital collaboration; IFS Food for retailer compliance and market access.
ISO 27032
ISO/IEC 27032:2023 Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security
Key Features
- Promotes multi-stakeholder collaboration in cyberspace ecosystems
- Provides guidelines for Internet security threats and controls
- Annex A maps to ISO/IEC 27002 controls
- Integrates with ISO/IEC 27001 ISMS frameworks
- Emphasizes risk assessment and incident coordination
IFS Food
IFS Food Version 8
Key Features
- Product and Process Approach with traceability tests
- Minimum 50% on-site production area evaluation
- Risk-based HACCP and KO critical requirements
- Food fraud and defense vulnerability assessments
- Annual audits with unannounced Star status option
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 27032 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27032:2023 is an international guidelines standard titled Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security. It provides non-certifiable guidance for managing Internet security risks in cyberspace, emphasizing a collaborative, multi-stakeholder approach integrated with risk assessment and controls from related standards.
Key Components
- Core areas: stakeholder roles, risk management, incident response, technical/organizational controls (e.g., access, vulnerability management, CIIP protection).
- Annex A maps threats to ISO/IEC 27002 controls.
- Built on principles of collaboration, trust, transparency, and PDCA cycle.
- No fixed controls; complements ISO/IEC 27001 ISMS without certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Reduces ecosystem risks, operational disruptions, and regulatory exposure (e.g., NIS2, GDPR).
- Enhances resilience, efficiency, stakeholder trust, and market differentiation.
- Supports competitive advantages like faster incident response and insurance benefits.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, risk assessment, controls deployment, monitoring.
- Applies to all organizations with online presence; scalable by size/industry.
- No formal certification; uses audits and continuous improvement.
IFS Food Details
What It Is
IFS Food Version 8 is a GFSI-benchmarked certification framework for food manufacturers, auditing product and process compliance to ensure safe, legal, authentic products meeting customer specifications. It employs a risk-based Product and Process Approach (PPA) with on-site verification and traceability tests.
Key Components
- Governance, HACCP, PRPs, operational controls in 5 sections
- Checklist with KO requirements (e.g., traceability, hygiene)
- Built on HACCP and integrated pest management principles
- Annual audits scoring A-D; Higher Level (≥95%), Foundation (≥75%)
Why Organizations Use It
- Essential for European retailer private-label access
- Reduces audit duplication, builds supply chain trust
- Mitigates risks (fraud, defense, allergens, foreign matter)
- Enhances efficiency, resilience, and market competitiveness
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, FSMS build, training, internal audits
- Applies to food processors/packers globally, site-specific
- Certification via ISO 17065 bodies; PPA with ≥50% on-site time
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 27032 | IFS Food |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Internet security guidelines in cyberspace ecosystem | Food manufacturing product/process safety and quality |
| Industry | All sectors with online/networked operations globally | Food processors, packagers, primarily European retailers |
| Nature | Non-certifiable voluntary guidance standard | GFSI-recognized certifiable audit standard |
| Testing | Gap analysis, risk assessments, internal exercises | Annual on-site product/process audits with sampling |
| Penalties | No direct penalties, loss of best practices | Certification denial, withdrawal, customer contract loss |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 27032 and IFS Food
ISO 27032 FAQ
IFS Food FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day
Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate
NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity
Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier
What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?
Discover DORA requirements for info security, strict authority monitoring, and steps to achieve compliance. Build a resilient organization with our detailed gui
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
HITRUST CSF vs CAA
Compare HITRUST CSF vs CAA: Uncover key differences in controls, maturity scoring, risk tailoring & assurance (e1/i1/r2). Streamline compliance, cut risks—find your best fit now!
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs ISO 41001
Compare FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs ISO 41001: electronic records integrity, signatures & validation meet facility mgmt standards. Optimize compliance in regulated ops. Discover now!
ISO 37001 vs ISO 37301
Compare ISO 37001 vs ISO 37301: Anti-bribery ABMS vs broad CMS. Uncover differences, benefits, implementation, and which fits your compliance needs—boost risk mitigation now.