ISO 27032
Guidelines for Internet cybersecurity and stakeholder collaboration
ISA 95
International standard for enterprise-control system integration
Quick Verdict
ISO 27032 provides cybersecurity guidelines for internet risks and stakeholder collaboration across sectors, while ISA 95 offers manufacturing integration models for enterprise-control systems. Organizations adopt them to reduce cyber threats and streamline IT/OT data flows.
ISO 27032
ISO/IEC 27032:2023 Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security
Key Features
- Multi-stakeholder collaboration for cyberspace ecosystems
- Guidelines for Internet security threats and controls
- Annex A mapping to ISO 27002 controls
- Risk assessment and incident response focus
- Complements ISO 27001 without certification
ISA 95
ANSI/ISA-95 Enterprise-Control System Integration
Key Features
- Purdue levels 0-4 hierarchy for boundaries
- Object models for equipment, materials, personnel
- Activity models for operations management
- Standardized Level 3-4 transactions
- Alias services for identifier mapping
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 27032 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27032:2023, titled Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security, is an international guidance standard (non-certifiable) focused on enhancing Internet security within broader cybersecurity. It connects information, network, Internet security, and CIIP, using a risk-based, collaborative approach for cyberspace threats.
Key Components
- Multi-stakeholder roles and collaboration frameworks
- Risk assessment, threat modeling, incident management
- Controls mapped to ISO/IEC 27002 via Annex A
- Principles: trust, transparency, PDCA continuous improvement
- No fixed controls; advisory integration with ISMS
Why Organizations Use It
- Reduces ecosystem risks, shortens incident dwell time
- Aligns with regulations (NIS2, GDPR); boosts resilience
- Enables market access, stakeholder trust, efficiency
- Strategic differentiation via collaborative security
Implementation Overview
- Phased: scoping, gap analysis, controls, monitoring
- Cross-functional teams, training, supplier vetting
- Suits all sizes/industries with online presence
- No certification; self-assess via ISO 27001 SoA
ISA 95 Details
What It Is
ISA-95 (ANSI/ISA-95, IEC 62264) is an international reference framework for integrating enterprise systems like ERP with manufacturing operations and control systems such as MES. It organizes activities into Purdue levels 0-4, focusing on semantic models and interfaces at the critical Level 3-4 boundary to enable consistent information exchange.
Key Components
- Hierarchical Purdue model defining system levels and boundaries
- Object models (Parts 2,4) for equipment, materials, personnel, production
- Activity models (Part 3) for operations management
- Transactions, messaging, aliasing (Parts 5-8) for standardized exchanges
- Compliance via model alignment, no formal certification
Why Organizations Use It
- Reduces integration risk, cost, errors; ensures data consistency
- Drives OEE improvement, traceability, agility in Industry 4.0
- Supports regulatory compliance, cybersecurity segmentation
- Builds trust through shared vocabulary across IT/OT stakeholders
Implementation Overview
- Phased: assessment, canonical modeling, pilot, governance rollout
- Applies to manufacturing globally, any size
- Emphasizes cross-functional teams, no mandatory audits
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 27032 | ISA 95 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Internet security, cyberspace risks, stakeholder collaboration | Enterprise-control integration, manufacturing levels 0-4 |
| Industry | All sectors with online presence, critical infrastructure | Manufacturing, process/discrete industries globally |
| Nature | Non-certifiable guidelines, voluntary best practices | Reference architecture, voluntary integration models |
| Testing | Gap analysis, tabletop exercises, continuous monitoring | Gap analysis, pilot integrations, data model validation |
| Penalties | No direct penalties, increased breach risks | No penalties, integration errors and costs |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 27032 and ISA 95
ISO 27032 FAQ
ISA 95 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
From SOC to AI-Native CDC: Redefining Triage and Response in 2026
Explore the shift from SOCs to AI-Native CDCs. Autonomous agents handle Tier 1 triage in 2026, empowering analysts for complex threats. Discover the future of c
Top 5 Audit Survival Secrets for Your First SOC 2 Type 2: What Auditors Really Check (and How to Pass)
Master your first SOC 2 Type 2 audit with proven strategies: 40-sample testing, vendor gaps, CPA walkthroughs. Get checklists, scripts & tips from SignWell to s
Asset-Backed Issuers and SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Applicability, Disclosures, and Compliance Roadmap
How SEC cybersecurity rules apply to asset-backed issuers (ABS): Form 10-D disclosures, ABS-EE risk management, Inline XBRL tagging, exemptions. Roadmap for tru
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
FISMA vs NIST 800-171
Discover FISMA vs NIST 800-171: Compare federal mandates with contractor CUI protections. Unlock RMF strategies, pitfalls, and compliance for resilient cybersecurity. Read now!
PIPL vs J-SOX
Compare PIPL vs J-SOX: China's strict privacy law meets Japan's financial controls regime. Unlock compliance strategies, risks & implementation for global success. Dive in now!
CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs ISO 41001
CSL vs ISO 41001: Compare China's Cybersecurity Law data rules with FM standards. Master compliance, risks, strategies & advantages for secure ops. Dive in now!