ISO 27032
International guidelines for Internet cybersecurity collaboration
ISO 26000
International guidance standard for social responsibility.
Quick Verdict
ISO 27032 provides cybersecurity guidelines for Internet security and stakeholder collaboration, while ISO 26000 offers social responsibility principles across governance, human rights, and environment. Companies adopt them for risk reduction, compliance alignment, and strategic trust-building in digital and societal ecosystems.
ISO 27032
ISO/IEC 27032:2023 Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security
Key Features
- Multi-stakeholder collaboration across cyberspace ecosystems
- Guidelines bridging information, network, Internet security
- Annex A mapping to ISO 27002 controls
- Risk assessment for Internet-specific threats
- Emphasis on detection, response, information sharing
ISO 26000
ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility
Key Features
- Seven core subjects for holistic SR coverage
- Seven principles underpinning all decisions
- Non-certifiable guidance for all organizations
- Stakeholder engagement drives prioritization
- Integrates with management systems like ISO 14001
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 27032 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27032:2023, titled Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security, is an international guidance standard (non-certifiable) focused on enhancing cybersecurity through multi-stakeholder collaboration in Internet ecosystems. It connects information security, network security, Internet security, and critical infrastructure protection, using a risk-based approach to manage cyberspace threats.
Key Components
- Thematic domains like risk assessment, incident management, stakeholder roles, and technical controls.
- Annex A maps Internet threats to ISO/IEC 27002 controls.
- Built on principles of collaboration, trust, and PDCA cycle.
- No fixed controls; advisory integration with ISO 27001 ISMS.
Why Organizations Use It
Adoption reduces breach risks, improves resilience, and aligns with regulations like NIS2/GDPR. It offers competitive differentiation, operational efficiency, stakeholder trust, and insurance benefits via demonstrated due diligence.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, risk assessment, controls deployment, monitoring. Applies to all sizes/industries with online presence; no certification but supports audits via ISO 27001 SoA.
ISO 26000 Details
What It Is
ISO 26000:2010 is the international guidance standard on social responsibility (SR). It provides voluntary, non-certifiable framework applicable to all organizations regardless of size, sector, or location. Its primary purpose is to guide integration of SR into governance, strategy, and operations through principles-based approach emphasizing context, stakeholder engagement, and holistic impact assessment.
Key Components
- Seven **core subjectsorganizational governance, human rights, labor practices, environment, fair operating practices, consumer issues, community involvement/development.
- Seven **principlesaccountability, transparency, ethical behavior, respect for stakeholder interests, rule of law, international norms, human rights.
- No fixed controls; focuses on guidance for prioritization and integration.
- Non-certifiable; uses self-assessment and transparent reporting.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances sustainability commitment, risk management, ESG alignment; builds stakeholder trust; supports compliance with norms like OECD, UNGPs, SDGs; drives resilience, reputation, market access without certification burden.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: materiality assessment, stakeholder engagement, policy integration, training, monitoring. Applies universally; no audits required, but aligns with ISO 14001/45001 for operationalization. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 27032 | ISO 26000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Internet security, cyberspace risks, multi-stakeholder collaboration | Social responsibility, seven core subjects including governance, human rights |
| Industry | All with online presence, critical infrastructure, global | All organizations, all sectors, public/private/non-profits, global |
| Nature | Voluntary guidance, non-certifiable, complements ISO 27001 | Voluntary guidance, explicitly non-certifiable, principles-based |
| Testing | Gap analysis, risk assessments, internal audits, no certification | Self-assessment, stakeholder engagement, no formal testing/certification |
| Penalties | No direct penalties, indirect via regulatory breach exposure | No penalties, reputational risk from misrepresentation claims |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 27032 and ISO 26000
ISO 27032 FAQ
ISO 26000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 Private Sector Tailoring Blueprint: First 5 Steps to Overlay-Driven Compliance with Infographic
Step-by-step blueprint for private sector NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 tailoring using overlays for AI & supply chain risks. Infographic + first 5 steps for ROI-drive
The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance
Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac
PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates
Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
Six Sigma vs AS9110C
Discover Six Sigma vs AS9110C: data-driven DMAIC methodology meets aerospace QMS standards for aviation maintenance. Compare belts, risks & compliance to optimize quality, safety & efficiency. Explore now!
NIS2 vs REACH
Unpack NIS2 vs REACH: EU cybersecurity directive vs chemicals regulation. Compare scopes, entity sizes, fines to 2% turnover, reporting. Master compliance now!
DORA vs RoHS
Compare DORA vs RoHS: EU finance cyber resilience act meets electronics hazmat rules. Decode differences, compliance strategies & risks to safeguard your ops now!