ISO 27032
International guidelines for Internet cybersecurity and collaboration
ISO 30301
International standard for records management systems
Quick Verdict
ISO 27032 provides cybersecurity guidelines for Internet security and stakeholder collaboration, while ISO 30301 establishes certifiable requirements for records management systems. Organizations adopt 27032 for cyber resilience and 30301 for governance, compliance, and evidentiary assurance.
ISO 27032
ISO/IEC 27032:2023 Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security
Key Features
- Multi-stakeholder collaboration for cyberspace security
- Guidelines focused on Internet security risks
- Maps threats to ISO 27002 controls via Annex A
- Emphasizes detection, response, and information sharing
- Complements ISO 27001 with ecosystem risk management
ISO 30301
ISO 30301:2019 Management systems for records requirements
Key Features
- HLS-aligned governance for MSR integration
- Normative Annex A operational controls
- Risk-based records requirements analysis
- Top management accountability and policy
- Flexible conformity pathways options
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 27032 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27032:2023 is an international guidance standard titled Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security. It provides non-certifiable recommendations for managing Internet security risks in interconnected ecosystems, emphasizing multi-stakeholder collaboration across information, network, and critical infrastructure domains. Its risk-based approach integrates with standards like ISO/IEC 27001.
Key Components
- Core areas: stakeholder roles, risk assessment, incident management, technical/organizational controls.
- Annex A maps Internet threats to ISO/IEC 27002's 93 controls.
- Principles: collaboration, trust, PDCA cycle for continuous improvement.
- No certification; advisory integration into ISMS.
Why Organizations Use It
Adoption reduces breach risks, enhances resilience, and supports regulations like NIS2/GDPR. Benefits include operational efficiency, stakeholder trust, competitive differentiation, and insurance savings via demonstrated due diligence.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, risk prioritization, control deployment, monitoring. Applies to all sizes, especially Internet-reliant sectors (cloud, finance, CIIP). Involves cross-functional teams, training, exercises; leverages existing frameworks for audits.
ISO 30301 Details
What It Is
ISO 30301:2019 (Information and documentation — Management systems for records — Requirements) is an international, certifiable standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving a Management System for Records (MSR). It ensures organizations create and control reliable evidence of business activities to support strategy, compliance, and governance. Applicable to any organization, it follows the High-Level Structure (HLS) with a risk-based PDCA approach.
Key Components
- Clauses 4–10: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement
- **Annex A (normative)operational controls for records lifecycle (creation, capture, access, retention, disposition)
- Principles: authenticity, reliability, integrity, usability
- Flexible conformity: self-declaration, external confirmation, or third-party certification
Why Organizations Use It
- Strengthens compliance, auditability, risk mitigation
- Enhances efficiency, transparency, decision traceability
- Builds stakeholder trust; integrates with ISO 9001, 27001
- Positions records as strategic assets
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, policy design, operational rollout, audits
- Scalable across sizes/industries; 12-18 months typical
- Requires leadership, training, system integration
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 27032 | ISO 30301 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Internet security guidelines in cyberspace | Records management system requirements |
| Industry | All with online presence, critical infrastructure | Any organization, regulated sectors emphasized |
| Nature | Non-certifiable guidance standard | Certifiable management system requirements |
| Testing | Gap analysis, internal audits, exercises | Internal audits, management review, certification |
| Penalties | No direct penalties, indirect regulatory risks | No direct penalties, certification loss possible |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 27032 and ISO 30301
ISO 27032 FAQ
ISO 30301 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity
Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier
CMMC Scoping Mastery for Defense Supply Chains: Enclave Mapping, Subcontractor Flow-Down, and CUI Inventory Blueprint
Master CMMC scoping for DIB: delineate FCI/CUI boundaries, segment enclaves, manage subcontractor flow-down. Prevent 80% assessment failures with SSP templates,
Top 5 Reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Overlays Unlock AI Risk Management for Private Sector Enterprises in 2025
Top 5 reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 AI overlays unlock risk management for private enterprises. Tailorable controls combat model poisoning & data leakage. CISO i
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 13485 vs AS9120B
Compare ISO 13485 vs AS9120B: Medical QMS meets aerospace distribution standards. Uncover key differences in risk, traceability, compliance for certification success. (152)
ISO 9001 vs GDPR UK
Discover ISO 9001 vs UK GDPR: Key differences in quality management & data protection. Align standards for seamless compliance & business resilience now!
WEEE vs GRI
Uncover WEEE vs GRI: EU's binding e-waste rules versus GRI's impact reporting for HES. Master compliance, boost circular economy & ESG strategy. Dive in!