ISO 13485
International standard for medical device QMS
AS9120B
Aerospace QMS standard for distributors ensuring traceability and counterfeit prevention.
Quick Verdict
ISO 13485 ensures medical device QMS for regulatory compliance and patient safety, while AS9120B mandates aerospace distributor controls for traceability and counterfeit prevention. Companies adopt them for market access, risk reduction, and supply chain credibility.
ISO 13485
ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices Quality management systems
Key Features
- Risk-based QMS for medical device lifecycle
- Regulatory requirements integration and compliance focus
- Design controls with verification and validation
- Process validation and sterile device controls
- Post-market surveillance and complaint handling
AS9120B
AS9120B Quality Management Systems for Distributors
Key Features
- Traceability controls for split lots and chain-of-custody
- Counterfeit and suspected unapproved parts prevention
- Risk-based external provider evaluation and flowdown
- Configuration management for distribution operations
- Product preservation and preservation controls
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 13485 Details
What It Is
ISO 13485:2016 is an international certification standard specifying requirements for a quality management system (QMS) tailored to medical devices and related services. Its primary purpose is enabling organizations to consistently meet customer and regulatory requirements across the device lifecycle, from design to post-market activities. It employs a risk-based process approach, emphasizing documented processes, validation, and traceability for regulatory audits.
Key Components
- Organized into Clauses 4–8: QMS/documentation (4), management responsibility (5), resources (6), product realization (7), measurement/improvement (8).
- Core elements include design controls, supplier management, process validation, traceability, and post-market surveillance.
- Built on process approach with PDCA; integrates ISO 14971 risk management.
- Third-party certification via accredited bodies with stage audits and surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives market access, reduces regulatory friction (e.g., EU MDR, FDA QMSR alignment by 2026), mitigates risks like recalls, and builds stakeholder trust. Provides competitive edge through operational excellence and supply chain assurance.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, documentation build, training, validation, internal audits, certification (9–18 months typical). Applies to manufacturers, suppliers, distributors globally; suits all sizes with tailored exclusions.
AS9120B Details
What It Is
AS9120B is the IAQG quality management system standard for aviation, space, and defense distributors. It augments ISO 9001:2015's high-level structure with distributor-specific requirements. Primary purpose: mitigate risks like traceability loss, counterfeit parts, and documentation errors in procurement, storage, splitting, and resale without altering products. Employs risk-based thinking and PDCA approach.
Key Components
- Over 100 aerospace additions to ISO 9001 clauses 4-10.
- Pillars: context/leadership (Clauses 4-5), planning/support (6-7), operations (traceability, counterfeit prevention, provider controls in Clause 8), evaluation/improvement (9-10).
- Built on ISO 9001 HLS; certification via accredited bodies, OASIS listing.
Why Organizations Use It
- Commercial necessity for OEM/Tier-1 supply chains.
- Reduces counterfeit risks, builds customer trust, enables market access (2,442 global certifications).
- Enhances efficiency, compliance with regulations like FAA/EASA.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-12 months).
- For distributors globally; requires internal audits, management reviews, certification audits.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 13485 | AS9120B |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Medical device lifecycle QMS: design to post-market | Aerospace parts distribution: procurement to resale |
| Industry | Medical devices, global manufacturers/suppliers | Aerospace distribution, aviation/space/defense |
| Nature | Regulatory-purpose QMS certification standard | IAQG QMS certification for distributors |
| Testing | Process validation, internal audits, certification audits | Traceability checks, supplier audits, certification audits |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, regulatory non-compliance | Loss of certification, supply chain exclusion |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 13485 and AS9120B
ISO 13485 FAQ
AS9120B FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for

CMMC Scoping Mastery for Defense Supply Chains: Enclave Mapping, Subcontractor Flow-Down, and CUI Inventory Blueprint
Master CMMC scoping for DIB: delineate FCI/CUI boundaries, segment enclaves, manage subcontractor flow-down. Prevent 80% assessment failures with SSP templates,

The Reasons Why NIS2 is Fundamental for Cyber Resilience in Europe
Uncover why NIS2 transcends compliance burdens, delivering real cyber resilience value through enforced measurements and activities. Explore insights via our pa
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
RoHS vs ISO 55001
Explore RoHS vs ISO 55001: RoHS restricts 10 hazards in EEE for safer waste; ISO 55001 optimizes asset lifecycles via governance. Master compliance, cut risks—unlock value now!
ISO 37301 vs BREEAM
ISO 37301 vs BREEAM: Certifiable CMS for compliance risks meets sustainability ratings for buildings. Integrate leadership, risk planning & ESG for resilient ops. Compare now!
IEC 62443 vs EMAS
IEC 62443 vs EMAS: Compare cybersecurity for IACS with EU environmental management. Discover key differences, compliance benefits & strategies for secure, sustainable ops. Read now!