ISO 31000
International guidelines for enterprise risk management
23 NYCRR 500
NY regulation for financial services cybersecurity.
Quick Verdict
ISO 31000 offers voluntary global risk management guidelines for all organizations, embedding principles into governance. 23 NYCRR 500 mandates cybersecurity controls for NY financial entities, enforced by fines. Firms use ISO for strategy, Part 500 for compliance.
ISO 31000
ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines
Key Features
- Defines risk as effect of uncertainty on objectives
- Eight principles: integrated, structured, customized, inclusive
- Framework embeds risk into governance and leadership
- Iterative six-step risk management process
- Non-certifiable guidelines for any organization
23 NYCRR 500
23 NYCRR Part 500 Cybersecurity Regulation
Key Features
- Risk-based cybersecurity program with annual assessments
- Mandatory CISO appointment and board reporting
- 72-hour cybersecurity incident notification to NYDFS
- Phishing-resistant MFA for high-risk access
- Third-party service provider security policy and oversight
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 31000 Details
What It Is
ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines is an international standard providing non-certifiable guidance for systematic risk management. Its primary purpose is to help organizations of any size or sector manage uncertainty to create and protect value. The approach is principles-based, emphasizing integration into governance and iterative processes.
Key Components
- **Three pillarsEight principles (e.g., integrated, dynamic, continual improvement), framework (leadership, design, implementation, evaluation), and process (communication, scope/context/criteria, assessment, treatment, monitoring/reporting).
- No fixed controls; flexible, tailored application.
- Built on PDCA cycle for sustainability.
- No certification model; internal alignment via governance.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances decision-making, resilience, and opportunity realization. Drives strategic benefits like better resource allocation and stakeholder trust. Addresses business risks without legal mandates. Provides competitive edge through risk-informed strategies.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: secure leadership commitment, design framework, pilot process, integrate into operations, monitor continually. Applicable universally; involves policy, roles, training, tools. No external audits required.
23 NYCRR 500 Details
What It Is
23 NYCRR Part 500 is the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) Cybersecurity Regulation, a prescriptive state-level regulation for financial entities. Its primary purpose is safeguarding nonpublic information (NPI) and information systems through risk-based cybersecurity programs. It adopts a hybrid approach: minimum standards with risk-tailored implementation.
Key Components
- 14 core requirements including cybersecurity program, CISO governance, risk assessments, MFA, encryption, penetration testing, TPSP oversight, and 72-hour incident reporting.
- Built on risk assessment foundation (NIST CSF or CRI Profile acceptable).
- Dual-signature annual certification by CEO/CISO; five-year record retention; Class A companies face enhanced audits/EDR.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for NY-licensed financial services (banks, insurers, etc.), with multimillion-dollar enforcement fines.
- Reduces cyber incident risk, improves resilience, lowers insurance premiums.
- Builds stakeholder trust via board oversight and evidence-based compliance.
Implementation Overview
- Phased roadmap: governance/CISO first, then MFA/asset inventory/TPSPs.
- Applies to Covered Entities in NY financial sector; exemptions for small firms.
- No external certification but NYDFS examinations and annual April 15 filing required.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 31000 | 23 NYCRR 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Enterprise-wide risk management principles, framework, process | Cybersecurity program for financial entities' systems and NPI |
| Industry | All industries, organizations worldwide | NY financial services licensees only |
| Nature | Voluntary guidelines, non-certifiable | Mandatory regulation with enforcement |
| Testing | Internal monitoring, reviews, continual improvement | Annual pen testing, vulnerability assessments required |
| Penalties | No legal penalties | Fines, consent orders, license actions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 31000 and 23 NYCRR 500
ISO 31000 FAQ
23 NYCRR 500 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: 10 Red Flags Auditors Flag and Model Answers for Walkthroughs
Master SOC 2 Type 2 audits with our guide: 10 red flags like incomplete logs/vendor gaps, model walkthrough answers, psychology tips. Pass first-time with <5% e

SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: Auditor Questions, Red Flags, and Evidence Prep for First-Time Pass
Ace your SOC 2 audit with predicted auditor questions, model answers, red flags, and evidence checklists from CPA best practices & SignWell's journey. Reduce st

Image this: What if GDPR would have NOT been implemented by the EU
What if the EU never implemented GDPR? Explore this hypothetical: consumer data protection in Dec 2025, key differences, pros/cons for users & companies. Read t
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
OSHA vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023
Explore OSHA vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023: Compare workplace safety regs with AI governance standards. Unlock compliance insights & risk strategies. Dive in now!
HIPAA vs ISO 50001
Compare HIPAA vs ISO 50001: Balance data privacy/security rules with energy management for compliant, efficient healthcare. Cut risks, boost sustainability—dive in!
CIS Controls vs ISO 27701
Compare CIS Controls vs ISO 27701: Cybersecurity hygiene meets privacy governance. Align frameworks, cut risks, streamline compliance. Expert insights & strategies await.