ISO 31000
International guidelines for enterprise-wide risk management
ISO 19600
International guidelines for compliance management systems
Quick Verdict
ISO 31000 provides risk management guidelines for all organizations, while ISO 19600 offers compliance system guidance (now withdrawn). Companies adopt ISO 31000 for broad uncertainty management and ISO 19600 for structured compliance frameworks.
ISO 31000
ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines
Key Features
- Eight principles for integrated, customized risk management
- Framework embedding risk into governance and leadership
- Iterative process: identify, analyze, treat, monitor risks
- Defines risk as effect of uncertainty on objectives
- Non-certifiable guidelines for any organization size
ISO 19600
ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems — Guidelines
Key Features
- Principles of good governance for CMS
- Risk-based PDCA management system structure
- Scalable to all organization sizes
- Broad compliance obligations identification
- Integration with other ISO management systems
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 31000 Details
What It Is
ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines is a non-certifiable international standard providing principles, framework, and process for managing uncertainty. Its primary purpose is systematic risk management to create and protect value, applicable to any organization, risk type, or level. It uses a principles-based, iterative approach defining risk as the effect of uncertainty on objectives.
Key Components
- **Eight principlesintegrated, structured, customized, inclusive, dynamic, best information, human factors, continual improvement.
- Framework (Clause 5): leadership commitment, integration, design, implementation, evaluation, improvement.
- Process (Clause 6): communication, scope/context/criteria, assessment, treatment, monitoring/review, recording/reporting. No fixed controls; flexible, PDCA-aligned model without certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances decision-making, resilience, and value creation. Drives strategic benefits like better resource allocation, opportunity capture, stakeholder trust. Voluntary but aligns with regulations, reduces losses, boosts reputation in sectors like finance, healthcare.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: leadership alignment, gap analysis, pilot process, integration, monitoring. Tailored for any size/industry; involves policy, training, tools like registers/dashboards. No audits required; internal assurance via reviews.
ISO 19600 Details
What It Is
ISO 19600:2014, Compliance management systems — Guidelines, is an international standard providing non-certifiable guidance for establishing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving a Compliance Management System (CMS). It uses a risk-based, principles-driven approach applicable to all organization types, emphasizing proportionality to size, structure, and complexity.
Key Components
- Follows high-level structure and PDCA cycle with 10 clauses: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- Core principles: good governance, proportionality, transparency, sustainability.
- Covers obligations identification, risk assessment, controls, training, monitoring, audits.
- No fixed controls; scalable guidance, not certifiable (superseded by ISO 37301).
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates compliance risks, reduces penalties, enhances governance.
- Builds culture of accountability, integrates with other ISO systems.
- Demonstrates commitment to regulators, stakeholders; supports judicial penalty mitigation.
- Provides strategic benchmarking, efficiency gains.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, policy design, controls rollout, monitoring setup.
- Scalable for SMEs (6-12 months) to enterprises (12-36 months).
- Universal applicability; internal audits, no external certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 31000 | ISO 19600 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Enterprise-wide risk management guidelines | Compliance management systems guidelines |
| Industry | All industries, any organization size globally | All industries, any organization size globally |
| Nature | Non-certifiable guidelines, voluntary | Non-certifiable guidelines, voluntary (withdrawn) |
| Testing | Internal monitoring, reviews, no certification | Internal audits, management reviews, no certification |
| Penalties | No formal penalties | No formal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 31000 and ISO 19600
ISO 31000 FAQ
ISO 19600 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 5 Reasons Automation Tools Like Vanta Slash SOC 2 Type 2 Timelines from Months to Weeks
Automation tools like Vanta cut SOC 2 Type 2 prep from 6 months to 6 weeks, saving 70% costs. See SignWell examples, AWS/Okta/GitHub integrations. CISOs: Get fi

Top 5 Reasons TISAX Tabletop Exercises Prevent €10M+ Supply Chain Breaches for ADAS Tier 1 Suppliers in 2025
Unlock top 5 reasons TISAX tabletop exercises deliver 4:1 ROI preventing €10M+ supply chain breaches for ADAS Tier 1 suppliers. ENX case studies & VDA ISA contr

Thailand PDPA Implementation Guide: Subordinate Regulations for 72-Hour Breach Reporting and Cross-Border Transfers (2022-2024 Rules)
Step-by-step Thailand PDPA guide: 72-hour breach notifications, cross-border transfers (2022-2024 rules). Risk checklists, GDPR templates avoid THB 5M fines. Mu
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
EPA vs REACH
EPA vs REACH: Compare US EPA standards (CAA, CWA, RCRA) & EU chemical regs for global compliance. Uncover differences, risks & strategies—expert insights await!
IEC 62443 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
Compare IEC 62443 vs MLPS 2.0: Global OT cybersecurity framework meets China's graded protection regime. Discover differences, compliance tips, and strategies for secure IACS. (152 characters)
CMMC vs CCPA
Compare CMMC vs CCPA: DoD cybersecurity tiers (NIST/FAR) for FCI/CUI defense vs CA privacy rights (know/delete/opt-out). Master compliance gaps & strategies. Secure your ops!