Standards Comparison

    ISO 31000

    Voluntary
    2018

    International guidelines for enterprise-wide risk management

    VS

    SOX

    Mandatory
    2002

    U.S. regulation for financial reporting integrity and controls

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 31000 offers voluntary risk management guidelines for all organizations globally, embedding risk into strategy. SOX mandates strict financial controls and certifications for U.S. public companies, ensuring reporting integrity via audits and penalties.

    Risk Management

    ISO 31000

    ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Defines risk as effect of uncertainty on objectives
    • Eight principles guide integrated risk management
    • Framework embeds risk into governance and operations
    • Iterative six-step risk management process
    • Non-certifiable guidelines for any organization
    Financial Reporting

    SOX

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates CEO/CFO certification of financial reports
    • Requires ICFR assessment and auditor attestation
    • Establishes PCAOB for public audit oversight
    • Enforces auditor independence and rotation
    • Imposes criminal penalties for false certifications

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 31000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines is a principles-based international standard providing flexible guidance for enterprise risk management. Its primary purpose is to help organizations systematically manage uncertainty affecting objectives, applicable to any size, sector, or type. It uses a risk-based approach defining risk as "the effect of uncertainty on objectives," emphasizing value creation and protection.

    Key Components

    • **Three pillarsEight principles (e.g., integrated, customized, dynamic), framework (leadership, integration, design, implementation, evaluation, improvement), and iterative process (communication, scope/context/criteria, assessment, treatment, monitoring/review, recording/reporting).
    • Built on PDCA cycle; no fixed controls.
    • Non-certifiable guidelines, focusing on alignment demonstration via internal governance.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Enhances decision-making, resilience, and opportunity capture; supports governance, strategy, and operations. Builds stakeholder trust, reduces losses, and aligns with regulations without certification mandates. Provides competitive edge through risk-informed strategies.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: leadership commitment, gap analysis, pilot process, integration, monitoring. Applies universally; involves policy, roles, training, tools like GRC platforms. No external audits required; internal reviews ensure continual improvement. (178 words)

    SOX Details

    What It Is

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) is a U.S. federal regulation enacted post-Enron scandals to enhance corporate accountability. It mandates accurate financial disclosures and robust internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) for public companies, employing a risk-based, top-down approach aligned with COSO frameworks.

    Key Components

    • **Three pillarsPCAOB oversight (Title I), auditor independence (Title II), executive certifications and ICFR (Titles III-IV).
    • Core sections: 302 (CEO/CFO certifications), 404 (ICFR assessment/attestation), 409 (real-time disclosures), 802/906 (penalties).
    • Focuses on key controls like ITGC, entity-level, financial close; no fixed count, emphasizes effectiveness.
    • Compliance model: annual management report, external auditor attestation (exemptions for smaller filers).

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for U.S. public issuers to avoid penalties, restatements.
    • Builds investor trust, reduces fraud risk, lowers cost of capital.
    • Drives governance maturity, operational efficiency via automation.
    • Enhances M&A/IPO readiness, competitive edge through reliable reporting.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: risk scoping, control design/documentation, testing/remediation, continuous monitoring.
    • Targets public companies (exemptions for EGCs/non-accelerated filers); cross-industry.
    • Involves IT/finance integration, GRC tools; requires PCAOB-aligned audits. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO 31000
    Enterprise-wide risk management guidelines
    SOX
    Financial reporting internal controls

    Industry

    ISO 31000
    All sectors, any organization globally
    SOX
    U.S. public companies and auditors

    Nature

    ISO 31000
    Voluntary guidelines, non-certifiable
    SOX
    Mandatory federal law with enforcement

    Testing

    ISO 31000
    Internal monitoring and reviews
    SOX
    Annual ICFR testing and auditor attestation

    Penalties

    ISO 31000
    No legal penalties
    SOX
    Fines, imprisonment, SEC enforcement

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 31000 and SOX

    ISO 31000 FAQ

    SOX FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages