ISO 37001
International standard for anti-bribery management systems
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
U.S. SEC regulation for cybersecurity incident and risk disclosures
Quick Verdict
ISO 37001 certifies voluntary anti-bribery systems globally, mitigating legal risks via due diligence. U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules mandate public firms disclose material incidents within 4 days and governance processes, ensuring investor transparency.
ISO 37001
ISO 37001: Anti-Bribery Management Systems
Key Features
- Risk-based bribery risk assessments proportionate to exposure
- Mandatory third-party due diligence and monitoring
- Leadership commitment with anti-bribery compliance function
- PDCA structure using Harmonized Structure for integration
- Certifiable controls for financial and non-financial bribery
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure
Key Features
- Four-business-day material incident disclosure via Form 8-K Item 1.05
- Annual risk management, strategy, governance disclosures in Item 106
- Inline XBRL tagging for machine-readable cyber disclosures
- Board oversight and management expertise requirements
- Inclusion of third-party systems in incident and risk scope
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 37001 Details
What It Is
ISO 37001:2025 Anti-Bribery Management Systems (ABMS) is an international certifiable standard providing requirements for establishing, implementing, and improving systems to prevent, detect, and respond to bribery. It applies to all organizations regardless of size or sector, focusing on direct/indirect bribery by personnel or business associates. The standard uses a risk-based, proportionate approach structured around the ISO Harmonized Structure (HS) and PDCA cycle (Clauses 4-10).
Key Components
- **Core pillarsContext/risk assessment (Clause 4), leadership/policy (5), planning (6), support/training (7), operations/due diligence (8), evaluation (9), improvement (10).
- Over 90 controls across financial/non-financial areas, third-party management, and investigations.
- Built on proportionality and evidence-based auditing; optional third-party certification with annual surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates legal risks under FCPA/UK Bribery Act; reduces liability via 'reasonable steps' evidence.
- Enhances reputation, stakeholder trust, ESG alignment; cuts compliance costs up to 15%.
- Enables market access, operational efficiency, cultural shifts in high-risk sectors like extractives.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: Gap analysis, risk assessment, control design, training, audits.
- Scalable for SMEs to multinationals; integrates with ISO 9001/37301.
- Certification via Stage 1/2 audits; transition to 2025 by Feb 2027.
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules Details
What It Is
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules (Release No. 33-11216) is a federal regulation mandating standardized disclosures for public companies. It requires timely reporting of material cybersecurity incidents and annual updates on risk management, strategy, and governance, applying a materiality-based approach under securities law.
Key Components
- **Form 8-K Item 1.05Four-business-day disclosure of material incidents' nature, scope, timing, and impacts.
- **Regulation S-K Item 106Annual descriptions of risk processes, board oversight, and management's role.
- Inline XBRL tagging for structured data.
- No fixed controls; focuses on processes and governance, with limited delays for national security.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances investor protection via uniform, timely information on cyber risks. Meets legal obligations for Exchange Act registrants, reduces information asymmetry, improves capital efficiency, and strengthens board accountability amid rising threats like ransomware and supply-chain attacks.
Implementation Overview
Involves gap analysis, cross-functional playbooks, materiality frameworks, and integration with disclosure controls. Applies to all public companies (domestic/FPI, SRC/EGC); phased compliance from Dec 2023. No certification, but SEC enforcement via exams and actions.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 37001 | U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Anti-bribery management systems only | Cybersecurity risk management and disclosures |
| Industry | All sectors worldwide, any size | U.S. public companies, all sectors |
| Nature | Voluntary certifiable management standard | Mandatory SEC reporting regulation |
| Testing | Third-party certification audits, annual surveillance | Internal disclosure controls, SEC review |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal fines | SEC enforcement fines, civil penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 37001 and U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
ISO 37001 FAQ
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance
Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for
Top 10 SOC 2 Audit Pitfalls and Fixes: Real Auditor Red Flags from Type 2 Fieldwork with Evidence Checklists
Discover 10 common SOC 2 Type 2 audit pitfalls like evidence gaps, scope creep, vendor oversights. Get Fail/Pass visuals, client stories, checklists for 95% fir
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
CSA vs ISO 19600
CSA vs ISO 19600: Compare CSA Z1000/Z1002 OHS standards with ISO 19600 CMS guidelines. Master risk assessment, hazard control & compliance for safer operations. Learn now!
AEO vs ISO 56002
AEO vs ISO 56002: Compare customs security certification with innovation management guidance. Unlock requirements, benefits & strategies for trade facilitation & growth. Dive in!
PIPL vs BRC
Compare PIPL vs BRC: China's GDPR-like data law meets global food safety standards. Master compliance strategies, risks, and phased implementation for business success. Dive in now!