ISO 37301
Certifiable international standard for compliance management systems
APRA CPS 234
Australian prudential standard for information security resilience
Quick Verdict
ISO 37301 provides certifiable compliance management for global organizations, while APRA CPS 234 mandates information security governance for Australian financial entities. Companies adopt ISO 37301 for broad integrity assurance; CPS 234 ensures cyber resilience under regulatory oversight.
ISO 37301
ISO 37301:2021 Compliance management systems – Requirements with guidance
Key Features
- Certifiable CMS requirements replacing guidance-only ISO 19600
- High-Level Structure enables integrated management systems
- Risk-based compliance obligations assessment and planning
- Mandates leadership commitment and compliance culture
- Requires confidential whistleblowing channels and protections
APRA CPS 234
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security
Key Features
- Board ultimate responsibility for information security
- 72-hour notification for material incidents to APRA
- Third-party managed assets full compliance scope
- Systematic independent testing of controls
- Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 37301 Details
What It Is
ISO 37301:2021 – Compliance management systems – Requirements with guidance for use is a certifiable international standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving effective compliance management systems (CMS). It replaces guidance-only ISO 19600, using a risk-based approach, PDCA cycle, and High-Level Structure (HLS) for broad applicability across organizations.
Key Components
- Core clauses: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- Identifies compliance obligations, assesses risks/opportunities, sets objectives/controls.
- Emphasizes whistleblowing, competence (ISO 37303), measurement (ISO 37302).
- Supports third-party certification via accredited bodies like ANAB.
Why Organizations Use It
- Provides external validation, reduces regulatory/reputational risks.
- Builds integrity culture, enhances stakeholder trust.
- Integrates with ISO 9001/14001/27001; aids ESG/SDGs.
- Drives continual improvement, investor confidence.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, register building, training, audits, certification.
- Scalable for SMEs to enterprises, all sectors.
- 3-year certification cycle with surveillance audits.
APRA CPS 234 Details
What It Is
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding prudential regulation for APRA-regulated financial institutions in Australia. Effective from 1 July 2019, it requires entities to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities, minimizing impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of information assets, including those managed by third parties. It employs a risk-based, assurance-driven model emphasizing governance, testing, and rapid notification.
Key Components
- Board ultimate responsibility (para 13) and defined roles (para 14)
- Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity (para 20)
- Commensurate controls across asset lifecycle (para 21)
- Systematic testing, internal audit assurance (paras 27-34)
- 72-hour notification for material incidents; 10 business days for control weaknesses (paras 35-36) No fixed controls; proportional to risk; integrates with CPS 220/230.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory compliance avoids APRA penalties, enforcement
- Enhances cyber resilience, third-party oversight
- Protects stakeholders, ensures operational continuity
- Builds regulatory trust, competitive edge in finance
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, policy framework, asset inventory, controls/testing, third-party assessments. Targets banks, insurers, super funds; ongoing internal audit, no external certification but APRA supervision.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 37301 | APRA CPS 234 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Compliance management systems across all obligations | Information security and cyber resilience |
| Industry | All sectors, global applicability | Australian financial services only |
| Nature | Voluntary certifiable standard | Mandatory prudential regulation |
| Testing | Internal audits, management reviews | Systematic independent control testing |
| Penalties | Loss of certification | Regulatory sanctions, fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 37301 and APRA CPS 234
ISO 37301 FAQ
APRA CPS 234 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Regulatory Radar: How Data-Driven Compliance Tools Provide Strategic Foresight
Unlock strategic foresight with data-driven compliance tools. Act as your regulatory radar: real-time monitoring, automated insights, and 3x cost cuts. Anticipa

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense
Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy

NIST CSF 2.0: Key Enhancements and How They Address Evolving Cyber Threats
Explore NIST CSF 2.0 updates: Govern function, supply chain security, SME playbooks for ransomware & AI threats. Boost your cyber defenses now!
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
CCPA vs ISO 22000
CCPA vs ISO 22000: Compare privacy rights, thresholds & fines with FSMS standards, HACCP & PRPs. Master compliance strategies for business resilience now.
CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs BREEAM
CSL vs BREEAM: Compare China's Cybersecurity Law & sustainability cert. Master compliance, risks, strategies for secure, green China ops. Unlock advantages now.
EN 1090 vs NERC CIP
Compare EN 1090 vs NERC CIP: EU steel/aluminum standards for CE marking & execution classes vs US grid cybersecurity. Unlock compliance insights for global ops. Read now!