Standards Comparison

    ISO 37301

    Voluntary
    2021

    International standard for compliance management systems

    VS

    IATF 16949

    Mandatory
    2016

    Global standard for automotive quality management systems

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 37301 establishes certifiable compliance management systems for all organizations, emphasizing risk-based culture and whistleblowing. IATF 16949 mandates automotive-specific quality systems with core tools for defect prevention. Companies adopt them for governance assurance and OEM supply chain access.

    Compliance Management

    ISO 37301

    ISO 37301:2021 Compliance management systems requirements

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Certifiable requirements replacing guidance-only ISO 19600
    • High-Level Structure enables IMS integration
    • Risk-based compliance obligations assessment and planning
    • Leadership commitment and organizational culture emphasis
    • Confidential whistleblowing channels with anti-retaliation protections
    Quality Management

    IATF 16949

    IATF 16949:2016

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates automotive core tools (APQP, FMEA, PPAP, MSA, SPC)
    • Requires non-delegable top management QMS responsibility
    • Emphasizes data-driven risk analysis and contingency planning
    • Strengthens supplier development and second-party audits
    • Integrates product safety processes with special characteristics

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 37301 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 37301:2021 is a certifiable international standard for Compliance Management Systems (CMS). It specifies requirements with guidance for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving effective CMS. Applicable to all organization sizes and sectors, it uses a risk-based approach and Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle via High-Level Structure (HLS).

    Key Components

    • **Leadership and cultureTop management accountability, compliance policy.
    • **PlanningRisk assessment, objectives, controls.
    • **SupportResources, competence, awareness, whistleblowing.
    • **OperationControls, third-party management.
    • **Performance evaluationMonitoring, audits, reviews.
    • **ImprovementCorrective actions, continual enhancement. Built on HLS for integration; supports certification by accredited bodies.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives regulatory compliance, reduces risks/fines, builds stakeholder trust. Enhances reputation, supports ESG/SDGs, provides certification for competitive edge. Addresses whistleblowing, climate action via 2024 amendment.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: context analysis, obligation register, controls, training, audits. Scalable for SMEs/enterprises; 3-year certification cycle. Involves leadership buy-in, platforms for registers/KPIs; global applicability.

    IATF 16949 Details

    What It Is

    IATF 16949:2016 is the international quality management system (QMS) standard for automotive production, service, and accessory parts organizations. Built on ISO 9001:2015, it incorporates automotive-specific requirements to prevent defects, reduce variation and waste, using a process-based, risk-based thinking approach aligned with the PDCA cycle across Clauses 4–10.

    Key Components

    • Core clauses: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement, with automotive supplements.
    • Mandatory core toolsAPQP**, FMEA, PPAP, MSA, SPC, Control Plans.
    • Focus on product safety, customer-specific requirements (CSRs), supplier management, warranty systems.
    • Certification model via IATF-recognized bodies with staged audits and rules.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Meets OEM contractual mandates for supply chain access.
    • Reduces cost of poor quality (COPQ), recalls, warranty costs.
    • Enhances process stability, customer satisfaction, competitive edge.
    • Builds trust with stakeholders through rigorous governance.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, core tool deployment, training, supplier development, internal audits, certification.
    • Targets automotive suppliers globally; 6–36 months based on size/complexity.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO 37301
    Compliance obligations, risks, culture, whistleblowing
    IATF 16949
    Automotive QMS, defect prevention, core tools

    Industry

    ISO 37301
    All sectors, all sizes worldwide
    IATF 16949
    Automotive supply chain only

    Nature

    ISO 37301
    Certifiable management system standard
    IATF 16949
    Certifiable QMS standard with automotive supplements

    Testing

    ISO 37301
    Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits
    IATF 16949
    Layered audits, core tool verification, surveillance audits

    Penalties

    ISO 37301
    Loss of certification, no legal fines
    IATF 16949
    Loss of OEM contracts, certification revocation

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 37301 and IATF 16949

    ISO 37301 FAQ

    IATF 16949 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages