Standards Comparison

    ISO 50001

    Voluntary
    2018

    International standard for energy management systems

    VS

    ISO 13485

    Mandatory
    2016

    International standard for medical device quality management systems

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 50001 enables energy performance improvement across industries via voluntary EnMS certification, while ISO 13485 mandates rigorous QMS for medical devices to ensure safety and regulatory compliance. Companies adopt them for cost savings, resilience, and market access.

    Energy Management

    ISO 50001

    ISO 50001:2018 Energy management systems Requirements

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Demonstrable continual energy performance improvement via EnPIs/EnBs
    • Annex SL structure integrates with ISO 9001/14001 systems
    • Energy review identifies SEUs and improvement opportunities
    • Mandatory energy data collection plan and metering strategy
    • Top management leadership accountability without dedicated representative
    Quality Management

    ISO 13485

    ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices Quality management systems

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based QMS for medical device lifecycle
    • Design and development controls with validation
    • Post-market surveillance and complaint handling
    • Supplier evaluation and outsourcing controls
    • Traceability and medical device file requirements

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 50001 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 50001:2018 is an international certification standard for Energy Management Systems (EnMS). It provides a systematic framework to improve energy performance—efficiency, use, and consumption—across organizations using the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle and Annex SL high-level structure.

    Key Components

    • Core elements: energy policy, review, Significant Energy Uses (SEUs), EnPIs, EnBs, data collection plans.
    • Clauses 4-10 align with other ISO standards.
    • Built on continual improvement and risk-based thinking.
    • Optional third-party certification via ISO 50003.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Drives cost savings (4-20% energy reductions), regulatory compliance, GHG reductions.
    • Enhances resilience, integrates with ESG strategies.
    • Builds stakeholder trust through auditable performance evidence.
    • Competitive edge in procurement and markets.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased PDCA approach: gap analysis, planning, deployment, evaluation.
    • Applicable to all sizes/sectors; focuses on metering, training, controls.
    • Involves energy reviews, audits, management reviews.

    ISO 13485 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 13485:2016, titled Medical devices — Quality management systems — Requirements for regulatory purposes, is a certifiable international standard for QMS in medical device organizations. It ensures consistent provision of safe devices meeting customer and regulatory requirements across the lifecycle, using a risk-based approach with documented processes, validation, and traceability.

    Key Components

    Organized into Clauses 4–8: QMS/documentation (4), management responsibility (5), resources (6), product realization (7, including design, purchasing, validation), measurement/improvement (8, with CAPA, audits, complaints). Emphasizes medical device files, supplier controls, post-market surveillance; certification by accredited bodies.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Facilitates market access (EU MDR, FDA QMSR 2026), mitigates risks/recalls, ensures compliance. Strategic benefits: operational efficiency, supply chain resilience, stakeholder trust, competitive differentiation via certification.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, process design, documentation/training, validation/audits, certification (Stage 1/2). Applies to manufacturers/suppliers globally; 9–18 months typical for mid-size firms, requires ongoing surveillance audits.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO 50001
    Energy performance improvement via EnMS
    ISO 13485
    Medical device QMS for lifecycle compliance

    Industry

    ISO 50001
    All sectors, cross-industry global
    ISO 13485
    Medical devices and related services

    Nature

    ISO 50001
    Voluntary certification standard
    ISO 13485
    Regulatory-purpose QMS standard

    Testing

    ISO 50001
    Internal audits, EnPI monitoring, optional certification
    ISO 13485
    Internal audits, process validation, certification common

    Penalties

    ISO 50001
    Loss of certification, no legal penalties
    ISO 13485
    Regulatory enforcement, market access denial

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 50001 and ISO 13485

    ISO 50001 FAQ

    ISO 13485 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages