What is the primary objective of **LGPD**?

**The primary objective of LGPD (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais, Law No. 13.709/2018) is to protect the fundamental rights of privacy and freedom of natural persons by regulating the processing of personal data.** Enacted August 14, 2018, it unifies fragmented norms under 10 core principles (Art. 6), including purpose limitation, necessity, transparency, security, prevention, non-discrimination, and accountability. LGPD grants data subjects rights to access, correction, deletion, portability, anonymization, and objection to automated decisions (Art. 18), while imposing obligations on controllers and operators for lawful processing via 10 legal bases (Art. 7).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **LGPD**?

**All controllers and operators processing personal data of Brazilian residents must comply with LGPD, regardless of company size or location.** Its extraterritorial scope (Art. 3) applies to any processing in Brazil, targeting Brazilian residents for goods/services, or data collected there. Controllers decide purposes/means (Art. 5, VI); operators execute instructions (Art. 5, VII). No thresholds exempt micro/small firms; applies to public/private entities across sectors like e-commerce, fintech, healthcare.

Does **LGPD** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**LGPD does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** The **Autoridade Nacional de Proteção de Dados (ANPD)** conducts audits (Arts. 55-56), but organizations must maintain Records of Processing Activities (RoPAs, Art. 37), perform Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) for high-risk activities (Art. 38), and demonstrate compliance via governance like DPO appointment (Art. 41). Voluntary certifications (e.g., ISO 27701) enhance maturity but are not required.

How often should an assessment for **LGPD** be performed?

**LGPD requires ongoing assessments, with Records of Processing Activities (RoPAs) and DPIAs updated continuously or as processing changes.** ANPD regulations (e.g., CD/ANPD No. 02/2022) mandate simplified records for small entities; full DPIAs for high-risk like legitimate interests (Art. 38). Quarterly internal audits, annual external reviews, and ad-hoc updates for incidents/transfers align with accountability principle (Art. 6, X). Breach logs retain 5 years (Res. CD/ANPD 15/2024).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **LGPD**?

**Non-compliance with LGPD incurs graduated sanctions by ANPD, including fines up to 2% of Brazilian revenue (capped at R$50 million per infraction).** Nine measures (Art. 52) range from warnings and daily fines to data blocking/deletion, processing suspension (up to 6 months, extendable), and prohibitions. Factors include gravity, cooperation, reoccurrence; applies to B2B/employee data. Civil claims for damages (Art. 42) add reputational/operational risks.

Can **LGPD** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, LGPD maps closely to other frameworks due to shared principles like purpose limitation, minimization, and data subject rights.** Its 10 principles (Art. 6) and rights (Art. 18) align with global regimes, facilitating hybrid programs. ANPD recognizes synergies for cross-border tools like Standard Contractual Clauses (Res. CD/ANPD 19/2024), though nuances (e.g., 10 bases vs. fewer elsewhere, revenue-based fines) require gap analysis.

What is the first step to begin implementing **LGPD**?

**The first step for LGPD implementation is appointing a Data Protection Officer (DPO) and conducting data mapping for a Record of Processing Activities (RoPA).** Secure executive sponsorship, appoint DPO (Art. 41, public disclosure), and inventory data flows, purposes, legal bases, retention, and transfers (Art. 37). This enables risk prioritization, DPIAs, and governance per phased methodology.

What is the primary objective of **K-PIPA**?

**The primary objective of K-PIPA is to protect personal information of living natural persons, prevent misuse, leakage, theft, or loss, and ensure proper handling by data handlers.** Enacted September 30, 2011, with amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024, it promotes transparency, purpose limitation, data minimization, and explicit consent for processing personal, sensitive (e.g., health, biometrics), and unique identification data (e.g., resident registration numbers).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **K-PIPA**?

**All data handlers—public agencies, private entities, and foreign operators processing Korean residents' personal information—are required to comply with K-PIPA.** This includes domestic and extraterritorial entities targeting Koreans via services, monitoring, or substantial impact per 2024 PIPC Guidelines; all must appoint Chief Privacy Officers (CPOs), with qualified CPOs for large entities (e.g., high sensitive data volumes).

Does **K-PIPA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**K-PIPA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification for private entities, though public institutions require file registration and DPIAs.** Compliance relies on internal CPO-led audits, security measures per 2024 PIPC Guidelines (e.g., encryption, access controls), and voluntary certifications like ISMS-P for cross-border transfers.

How often should an assessment for **K-PIPA** be performed?

**K-PIPA assessments should be performed regularly through CPO-led internal audits, with risk assessments integrated into ongoing operations and updates following amendments.** No fixed frequency is prescribed, but breach response, data mapping, and compliance reviews must support 72-hour notifications and 10-day data subject rights responses.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **K-PIPA**?

**Non-compliance with K-PIPA results in fines up to 3% of annual revenue (capped at KRW 3 billion ≈ €2.1 million), corrective orders, surcharges up to 5x damages, and criminal penalties up to 5 years imprisonment.** PIPC enforces via investigations; examples include Google's KRW 70 billion fine (2022).

Can **K-PIPA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, K-PIPA aligns with international frameworks through EU adequacy recognition (December 17, 2021), enabling data flows, with mappings to principles like consent, rights, and security.** Similarities include data subject rights (access, erasure, portability) and breach notifications, though K-PIPA emphasizes consent primacy and CPO mandates.

What is the first step to begin implementing **K-PIPA**?

**The first step to implement K-PIPA is appointing a qualified Chief Privacy Officer (CPO) with independence and resources for compliance oversight.** Follow with data inventory mapping, granular consent systems, and privacy policies per PIPC guidelines.

LGPD vs K-PIPA

Standards Comparison

LGPD

Mandatory

2020

Brazil's comprehensive regulation for personal data protection

K-PIPA

Mandatory

2011

South Korea's stringent personal data protection regulation

Quick Verdict

LGPD safeguards Brazilian residents' data with 10 principles and ANPD oversight, while K-PIPA enforces strict consent and CPO mandates in Korea. Companies adopt LGPD for Brazil market access, K-PIPA for Korean compliance, avoiding multimillion fines and building trust.

Data Privacy

LGPD

Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (Law No. 13.709/2018)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Extraterritorial scope targeting Brazilian residents' data
Ten core principles including prevention and non-discrimination
Mandatory DPO for controllers with public disclosure
Fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue per infraction
3-business-day breach notifications to ANPD and subjects

Data Privacy

K-PIPA

Personal Information Protection Act

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Mandatory independent Chief Privacy Officer appointment
Granular explicit consent for sensitive data transfers
72-hour breach notifications to subjects and regulators
Extraterritorial application to foreign entities targeting Koreans
Data subject rights with strict 10-day response deadlines

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

LGPD Details

What It Is

Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD), Law No. 13.709/2018, is Brazil's comprehensive data protection regulation. Enacted in 2018 and fully enforced since 2021, it governs personal data processing with extraterritorial scope, applying to any entity targeting Brazilian residents. Its risk-based approach emphasizes accountability, mirroring GDPR but with Brazil-specific adaptations like 10 principles.

Key Components

**10 core principlespurpose limitation, necessity, transparency, security, prevention, non-discrimination, accountability.
10 legal bases for processing, including consent and legitimate interests.
**Data subject rightsaccess, correction, deletion, portability, objection to automated decisions.
**Governancemandatory DPO for controllers, DPIAs for high-risk processing, RoPAs.
Enforcement by ANPD with graduated sanctions; no certification but compliance audits.

Why Organizations Use It

LGPD compliance avoids fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue (R$50M cap), operational suspensions, and litigation. It builds stakeholder trust, enables market access in Brazil's digital economy, reduces breach risks, and supports innovation via anonymization exemptions.

Implementation Overview

**Phased, risk-based methodologygovernance setup, data mapping/RoPAs, policies, technical controls (encryption, access), DSR/incident processes, vendor management with SCCs by 2025. Applies to all sizes/industries processing Brazilian data; ongoing ANPD monitoring required.

K-PIPA Details

What It Is

K-PIPA, the Personal Information Protection Act, is South Korea's comprehensive data protection regulation, enacted in 2011 with major amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024. It adopts a consent-centric, risk-based approach to protect personal information of Korean residents, applying broadly to domestic and foreign data handlers processing identifiable data, including pseudonymized and sensitive information like biometrics or health data.

Key Components

**Core principlesTransparency, purpose limitation, data minimization, explicit granular consent.
Obligations include mandatory Chief Privacy Officer (CPO) appointment, security measures (encryption, access controls), data subject rights (access, rectification, erasure, portability within 10 days), and 72-hour breach notifications.
Enforced by PIPC with fines up to 3% of revenue; no formal certification but guidelines and audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Ensures legal compliance amid extraterritorial scope and high penalties (e.g., Google's $50M fine).
Mitigates breach risks, builds stakeholder trust, enables EU adequacy-aligned data flows.
Provides competitive edge in Korea's privacy-sensitive market through robust governance.

Implementation Overview

**Phased approachGap analysis, CPO governance, policy development, technical controls, training, audits.
Targets all data handlers, especially large entities; requires Korean-language notices and ongoing monitoring.

Key Differences

Aspect	LGPD	K-PIPA
Scope	Personal data processing, rights, transfers	Personal info handling, consent, breaches
Industry	All sectors, Brazil/Brazilian residents	All sectors, Korea/Korean residents
Nature	Mandatory law, ANPD enforcement	Mandatory law, PIPC enforcement
Testing	DPIAs for high-risk, ANPD audits	Security audits, no private DPIAs
Penalties	2% Brazil revenue, R$50M cap	3% revenue, KRW 3B cap

Scope

LGPD

Personal data processing, rights, transfers

K-PIPA

Personal info handling, consent, breaches

Industry

LGPD

All sectors, Brazil/Brazilian residents

K-PIPA

All sectors, Korea/Korean residents

Nature

LGPD

Mandatory law, ANPD enforcement

K-PIPA

Mandatory law, PIPC enforcement

Testing

LGPD

DPIAs for high-risk, ANPD audits

K-PIPA

Security audits, no private DPIAs

Penalties

LGPD

2% Brazil revenue, R$50M cap

K-PIPA

3% revenue, KRW 3B cap

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about LGPD and K-PIPA

LGPD FAQ

K-PIPA FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

Deploy CIS Controls v8.1 as a control backbone for NIS2 & DORA compliance. Step-by-step roadmap (IG1→IG2), deliverables, metrics & evidence model for hybrid/clo

The SOC Maturity Roadmap: A 5-Step Blueprint for Scaling from Ad-Hoc to Optimized Operations

Unlock SOC excellence with our 5-step maturity roadmap. Compare SOC-CMM, NIST CSF, and CMMC frameworks to scale from ad-hoc to automated operations. Start your

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIS2 in Your Organization

Master NIS2 implementation with our detailed guide. Learn requirements, risk assessment, supply chain security, and compliance steps for your organization. Star

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 27701 vs ISO 41001

Compare ISO 27701 vs ISO 41001: Privacy PIMS extends ISO 27001 for data protection; FM system aligns facilities with strategy. Discover compliance, gaps & implementation roadmap now!

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs IEC 62443

Compare FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs IEC 62443: electronic records compliance meets IACS cybersecurity. Master key differences, risks, and strategies for regulated ops. Dive in!

CCPA vs CMMI

Discover CCPA vs CMMI: Privacy law meets process maturity. Expert strategies, compliance frameworks, pitfalls, and ROI insights. Elevate business resilience today!

LGPD

K-PIPA

Quick Verdict

LGPD

Key Features

K-PIPA

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

LGPD Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

K-PIPA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

LGPD FAQ

What is the primary objective of LGPD?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with LGPD?

Does LGPD require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for LGPD be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with LGPD?

Can LGPD be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing LGPD?

K-PIPA FAQ

What is the primary objective of K-PIPA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with K-PIPA?

Does K-PIPA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for K-PIPA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with K-PIPA?

Can K-PIPA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing K-PIPA?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

The SOC Maturity Roadmap: A 5-Step Blueprint for Scaling from Ad-Hoc to Optimized Operations

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIS2 in Your Organization

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 27701 vs ISO 41001

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs IEC 62443

CCPA vs CMMI