Standards Comparison

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023

    Voluntary
    2023

    International standard for AI management systems

    VS

    ISO 22301

    Voluntary
    2019

    International standard for business continuity management systems.

    Quick Verdict

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 governs AI systems responsibly via AIMS and risk assessments, while ISO 22301 ensures business continuity amid disruptions through BIA and recovery plans. Companies adopt them for ethical AI compliance and operational resilience.

    AI Management

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 — AI management system

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • First international standard for AI Management Systems
    • Mandatory AI Impact Assessments for high-risk systems
    • Annex A with 38 AI-specific controls
    • PDCA methodology across AI lifecycle
    • HLS integration with ISO 27001 and 9001
    Business Continuity

    ISO 22301

    ISO 22301:2019 Business continuity management systems — Requirements

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    0-6 months

    Key Features

    • PDCA cycle and Annex SL high-level structure
    • Business Impact Analysis (BIA) and Risk Assessment (RA)
    • Leadership commitment with policy and roles (Clause 5)
    • Operational planning, controls, and testing exercises (Clause 8)
    • Performance evaluation, audits, and continual improvement (Clauses 9-10)

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 — Artificial intelligence management system is the world's first international certification standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an Artificial Intelligence Management System (AIMS). It applies universally to any organization involved in AI development, provision, or use, employing a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) methodology to govern AI risks and opportunities across the full lifecycle.

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.
    • Annex A provides 38 AI-specific controls addressing data, transparency, integrity, and resiliency.
    • Built on Annex SL High-Level Structure (HLS) for integration with ISO 9001/27001.
    • Optional certification via accredited third-party audits with 3-year validity and surveillance.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Adoption drives ethical AI, regulatory alignment (e.g., EU AI Act), risk mitigation (bias, drift), and competitive edges like trust and procurement advantages. Early adopters like Microsoft and UiPath gain reputation and efficiency.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: gap analysis, policy development, AIIAs, controls deployment. Suited for all sizes/sectors; 6-12 months typical with tools like ISMS.online. Requires leadership commitment and operational data for audits.

    ISO 22301 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 22301:2019 is an international certification standard for establishing, implementing, and improving a Business Continuity Management System (BCMS). It provides requirements to protect against, respond to, and recover from disruptions, ensuring continuity of critical products and services. Built on a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle and Annex SL high-level structure.

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4-10 covering context, leadership, planning (including BIA/RA), support, operations (testing/exercises), performance evaluation, and improvement.
    • No fixed controls; flexible, tailored requirements.
    • Core principles: resilience, risk management, continual improvement.
    • Certification via accredited bodies with 3-year validity and annual surveillance.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mitigates risks from cyberattacks, disasters, supply failures; reduces downtime and costs.
    • Meets regulatory needs (e.g., NIS Directive); lowers insurance premiums.
    • Builds stakeholder trust, enhances competitiveness, enables IMS with ISO 27001.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased approach: gap analysis, BIA/RA, policy development, training, testing, audits.
    • Applicable to all sizes/sectors; accelerated by digital platforms (e.g., 6 months).
    • Two-stage certification audit process.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    AI lifecycle governance, risks, ethics
    ISO 22301
    Business continuity, disruptions, recovery

    Industry

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    All sectors using AI globally
    ISO 22301
    All sectors facing disruptions globally

    Nature

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    Voluntary AIMS certification standard
    ISO 22301
    Voluntary BCMS certification standard

    Testing

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    AIIAs, audits, management reviews
    ISO 22301
    BIA/RA, exercises, internal audits

    Penalties

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    Loss of certification, no legal fines
    ISO 22301
    Loss of certification, no legal fines

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and ISO 22301

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 FAQ

    ISO 22301 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages