ISO/IEC 42001:2023
International standard for AI management systems
ISO 27017
International code of practice for cloud security controls
Quick Verdict
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 governs AI management systems responsibly across lifecycles, while ISO 27017 provides cloud-specific security controls. Companies adopt 42001 for ethical AI compliance and trust; 27017 for shared cloud responsibility and procurement assurance.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Management Systems
Key Features
- PDCA-based AI Management System framework
- Mandates AI Impact Assessments for high-risk AI
- 38 AI-specific controls in Annex A
- High-Level Structure for ISO integration
- Full AI lifecycle risk management
ISO 27017
ISO/IEC 27017:2015 Cloud security controls code
Key Features
- Clarifies shared responsibilities between CSPs and CSCs
- Adds 7 cloud-specific CLD controls for multi-tenancy
- Provides guidance on 37 ISO 27002 controls for cloud
- Addresses VM hardening and segregation in virtual environments
- Enables customer monitoring of cloud service activities
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is the world's first international certification standard for Artificial Intelligence Management Systems (AIMS). It specifies requirements to establish, implement, maintain, and improve AIMS, using a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) methodology. Applicable to any organization developing, providing, or using AI, it addresses ethical, technical, and societal AI risks across the full lifecycle.
Key Components
- **Clauses 4-10Cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.
- **Annex A38 AI-specific controls for data, transparency, integrity, resiliency.
- Built on Annex SL High-Level Structure for ISO interoperability (e.g., 27001, 9001).
- Optional third-party certification via accredited audits.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances trust, mitigates bias/model drift risks, aligns with EU AI Act, enables innovation. Provides competitive differentiation, procurement advantages, insurance discounts, and reputation via certification.
Implementation Overview
Phased gap analysis, AIIAs, training, monitoring KPIs. Suited for all sizes/sectors; 6-12 months typical with tools like ISMS.online. Requires leadership buy-in, documentation, audits for certification.
ISO 27017 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27017:2015 is a code of practice extending ISO/IEC 27002 with cloud-specific information security controls. It provides implementation guidance for cloud services across IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS in public, private, or hybrid deployments. Its risk-based approach clarifies responsibilities in shared cloud environments.
Key Components
- Guidance on 37 ISO 27002 controls adapted for cloud contexts.
- 7 additional CLD controls for shared roles, multi-tenancy segregation, VM hardening, admin operations, monitoring, asset lifecycle, and network alignment.
- Built on ISO 27001 ISMS; not standalone certification.
- Dual perspective for CSPs and CSCs.
Why Organizations Use It
- Addresses cloud risks like multi-tenancy and shared responsibility.
- Supports regulatory alignment (e.g., GDPR) and procurement demands.
- Enhances risk management and customer trust.
- Provides competitive edge via auditable cloud security posture.
Implementation Overview
- Integrate into existing ISO 27001 via risk assessment and SoA updates.
- Key activities: control mapping, configuration hardening, shared responsibility matrices.
- Applies to CSPs, CSCs of all sizes; global applicability.
- Audited as extension of ISO 27001 certification (joint audits 9-12 months).
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO/IEC 42001:2023 | ISO 27017 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | AI management systems, lifecycle risks, ethics | Cloud-specific information security controls |
| Industry | All sectors, AI developers/providers/users globally | Cloud providers/customers, all industries globally |
| Nature | Certifiable AIMS management system standard | Guidance code extending ISO 27002, not standalone |
| Testing | Third-party audits, AIIAs, continual monitoring | Integrated into ISO 27001 audits, no standalone cert |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and ISO 27017
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 FAQ
ISO 27017 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 5 Reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Overlays Unlock AI Risk Management for Private Sector Enterprises in 2025
Top 5 reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 AI overlays unlock risk management for private enterprises. Tailorable controls combat model poisoning & data leakage. CISO i
PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates
Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt
NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights
Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
OSHA vs ISO 50001
Compare OSHA vs ISO 50001: U.S. safety standards vs global energy mgmt. Unlock compliance strategies, hazard controls, EnPIs & baselines for safer, efficient workplaces. Optimize today!
ISO 14064 vs EU AI Act
Compare ISO 14064 vs EU AI Act: GHG standards for emissions vs AI risk rules. Unlock compliance strategies, principles & gaps for sustainability-tech alignment. Dive in now!
GMP vs IEC 62443
Explore GMP vs IEC 62443: Compare pharma quality standards with IACS cybersecurity for secure manufacturing. Ensure compliance, safety & resilience—integrate now for peak efficiency!