ISO/IEC 42001:2023
International standard for AI management systems
ISO 28000
International standard for supply chain security management systems
Quick Verdict
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 governs AI systems responsibly across lifecycles, while ISO 28000 secures supply chains against threats. Companies adopt 42001 for ethical AI trust and compliance; 28000 for resilience, risk reduction, and partner assurance.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Management Systems
Key Features
- Mandates AI Impact Assessments for high-risk systems
- Provides 38 AI-specific controls in Annex A
- Applies PDCA methodology to AI lifecycle governance
- Integrates via High-Level Structure with ISO standards
- Requires leadership commitment and documented AI policy
ISO 28000
ISO 28000:2022 Security management systems — Requirements
Key Features
- Risk-based PDCA cycle for supply chain security
- Leadership commitment and top management accountability
- Supplier and third-party risk management controls
- Operational security plans and incident response
- Continual improvement via audits and reviews
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is the world's first international standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an Artificial Intelligence Management System (AIMS). It provides a risk-based framework using the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) methodology to govern AI responsibly across the full lifecycle, applicable to any organization regardless of size or sector.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.
- Annex A includes 38 AI-specific controls for risks like bias, transparency, and third-party management.
- Built on High-Level Structure (HLS) for integration with ISO 9001/27001.
- Optional third-party certification via accredited auditors.
Why Organizations Use It
Organizations adopt it for ethical AI governance, regulatory alignment (e.g., EU AI Act), risk mitigation (bias, model drift), and competitive advantages like enhanced trust and procurement leverage. Early adopters like Microsoft and UiPath gain credibility and efficiencies.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, policy development, AIIAs, training, audits. Typical for all sizes/industries; 6-12 months with tools like ISMS.online; certification requires operational data and surveillance audits.
ISO 28000 Details
What It Is
ISO 28000:2022 is an international certification standard for security management systems (SMS) focused on supply chain security. It specifies requirements to establish, implement, maintain, and improve SMS using a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach, aligned with ISO 31000 and other management standards.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, and improvement.
- Emphasizes risk assessment/treatment, operational controls, security plans, and supplier interdependencies.
- Built on harmonized ISO structure; no fixed controls, but holistic governance.
- Optional third-party certification via ISO 28003-audited bodies.
Why Organizations Use It
- Reduces supply chain risks like theft, sabotage, disruptions.
- Meets contractual, regulatory, insurance needs.
- Enhances resilience, market access, stakeholder trust.
- Provides competitive edge in logistics, manufacturing.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, risk assessment, controls deployment, audits.
- Applicable to all sizes/sectors; scalable.
- Involves training, documentation, internal audits; certification via Stage 1/2 audits. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO/IEC 42001:2023 | ISO 28000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | AI lifecycle governance, ethics, risks | Supply chain security, resilience, operations |
| Industry | All sectors using AI globally | Logistics, manufacturing, all supply chains |
| Nature | Voluntary AIMS certification standard | Voluntary SMS certification standard |
| Testing | Third-party audits, AIIAs, metrics | Internal audits, management reviews, surveillance |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal fines | Loss of certification, no legal fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and ISO 28000
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 FAQ
ISO 28000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Beyond the Checkbox: Why Maturity Assessments are the Secret to Sustainable Compliance
Discover why maturity assessments beat binary compliance checks by uncovering hidden gaps and enabling continuous improvement for sustainable success. Read now!
Thailand PDPA Implementation Guide: Subordinate Regulations for 72-Hour Breach Reporting and Cross-Border Transfers (2022-2024 Rules)
Step-by-step Thailand PDPA guide: 72-hour breach notifications, cross-border transfers (2022-2024 rules). Risk checklists, GDPR templates avoid THB 5M fines. Mu
The DORA 'Hot Seat' Blueprint: Preparing Leadership and the Management Body for Regulatory Interviews
Prepare your Board & Management Body for DORA audits. Master the human element: demonstrate active oversight & accountability in regulatory interviews. Get the
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
FERPA vs ISO 26000
Compare FERPA vs ISO 26000: U.S. student privacy law meets global social responsibility guidance. Unlock key differences, compliance strategies & implementation tips for educators. Dive in!
COPPA vs REACH
COPPA vs REACH: Compare US child privacy rules (under-13 consent, $170M fines) with EU chemical regs (1tpa registration, SVHC curbs). Master compliance—act now!
WEEE vs ISO 13485
Explore WEEE vs ISO 13485: EU e-waste rules meet medical QMS standards. Uncover compliance gaps, recycling targets, risk controls. Master strategies for success now!