Standards Comparison

    K-PIPA

    Mandatory
    2011

    South Korea's regulation for personal data protection

    VS

    AS9110C

    Mandatory
    2016

    Aerospace standard for aviation maintenance quality management.

    Quick Verdict

    K-PIPA mandates data privacy for Korean operations with consent and breach rules, while AS9110C certifies aerospace MRO quality via audits and safety controls. Companies adopt K-PIPA for legal compliance, AS9110C for market access and operational excellence.

    Data Privacy

    K-PIPA

    Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Mandatory Chief Privacy Officer with independence guarantees
    • Granular explicit consent for sensitive data transfers
    • 72-hour breach notifications to subjects and regulators
    • Extraterritorial reach targeting foreign entities monitoring Koreans
    • Revenue-based fines up to 3% annual turnover
    Quality Management

    AS9110C

    AS9110C: Quality Management Systems for Aviation Maintenance

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based thinking in strategic and operational planning
    • Configuration management and traceability controls
    • Counterfeit and suspect parts prevention
    • Human factors in root cause analysis
    • Continuing airworthiness and release requirements

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    K-PIPA Details

    What It Is

    K-PIPA (Personal Information Protection Act) is South Korea's comprehensive data protection regulation, enacted in 2011 with major amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024. It governs collection, use, storage, transfer, and destruction of personal information, including sensitive and unique identifiers, for all data handlers—domestic and foreign. Its consent-centric, risk-based approach emphasizes explicit opt-ins, data minimization, and accountability.

    Key Components

    • Core principles: transparency, purpose limitation, minimization, accuracy.
    • Mandatory CPO appointment, granular consents, 10-day data subject rights (access, erasure, portability).
    • Security via encryption, access controls; 72-hour breach notifications.
    • No fixed controls count; enforced by PIPC with revenue-based fines up to 3%.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Legal compliance avoids fines (e.g., Google's KRW 70B); enables EU adequacy data flows. Builds trust, supports AI/innovation via pseudonymization, reduces breach risks through governance.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, CPO setup, technical controls, training, audits. Applies to all sizes/sectors targeting Koreans; no certification but PIPC guidelines/ISMS-P recommended. Involves data mapping, vendor DPAs, continuous monitoring.

    AS9110C Details

    What It Is

    AS9110C (AS9110:2016 Rev C) is an international aerospace quality management system (QMS) certification standard tailored for aviation maintenance organizations (MROs), such as repair stations. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 using Annex SL structure and PDCA logic, with aviation-specific additions for risk-based thinking, configuration management, and continuing airworthiness.

    Key Components

    • Core clauses 4–10 covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
    • Key additions: counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, traceability, product safety, external provider controls.
    • No fixed control count; focuses on documented information and process effectiveness.
    • Certification via IAQG-accredited bodies, listed in OASIS database.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Meets customer/OEM contracts and regulatory alignments (FAA/EASA Part 145).
    • Mitigates safety risks, ensures traceability for airworthiness.
    • Enhances market access, on-time delivery, customer satisfaction.
    • Builds stakeholder trust through auditable QMS.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-12 months typical).
    • Applies to MROs globally, any size.
    • Requires internal audits, management review before Stage 1/2 certification.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    K-PIPA
    Personal data protection, consent, rights, breaches
    AS9110C
    Aerospace MRO quality management, maintenance, safety

    Industry

    K-PIPA
    All sectors handling Korean data, global reach
    AS9110C
    Aviation maintenance organizations worldwide

    Nature

    K-PIPA
    Mandatory data privacy law, PIPC enforcement
    AS9110C
    Voluntary QMS certification standard

    Testing

    K-PIPA
    No formal certification, PIPC audits/investigations
    AS9110C
    Regular internal/external audits, certification

    Penalties

    K-PIPA
    Fines up to 3% revenue, imprisonment
    AS9110C
    Loss of certification, no legal penalties

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about K-PIPA and AS9110C

    K-PIPA FAQ

    AS9110C FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages